2008 United States presidential election: Difference between revisions
imported>Richard Jensen m (→"Tsunami Tuesday": Feb 5: update NJ %) |
imported>Robert W King (format.) |
||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
For daily updates on the polls see [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/] | For daily updates on the polls see [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/] | ||
===Iowa: | {|colspan=3 width="100%" | ||
|valign="top" width="32%"| | |||
{|cellpadding="5" style="background-color:#D1ECD1; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:10px; font-size: 85%;" | |||
|<center><B><big>Iowa:</big><BR><U><big>January 3</big></U></b></center><BR> | |||
Obama scored a surprise win in the Jan 3, Iowa caucuses, 9 points ahead of Edwards, who was slightly ahead of Clinton. He immediately gained so much momentum that many observers though the Clinton campaign was in danger of collapsing. | Obama scored a surprise win in the Jan 3, Iowa caucuses, 9 points ahead of Edwards, who was slightly ahead of Clinton. He immediately gained so much momentum that many observers though the Clinton campaign was in danger of collapsing. | ||
Republican [[Mike Huckabee]], a former governor of Arkansas, (and former Baptist minister), made a strong appeal to the religious conservatives. His base of support is "born again" evangelical Christians, who comprise 35% of national GOP voters and 47% of the GOP voters in Iowa. Years as a TV announcer gave him a polished yet informal campaign persona that no other candidate could match. Outspent by Romney 10-1, Huckabee nevertheless scored a major upset in the Iowa caucuses, coming in first and beating Romney by 9 points. | Republican [[Mike Huckabee]], a former governor of Arkansas, (and former Baptist minister), made a strong appeal to the religious conservatives. His base of support is "born again" evangelical Christians, who comprise 35% of national GOP voters and 47% of the GOP voters in Iowa. Years as a TV announcer gave him a polished yet informal campaign persona that no other candidate could match. Outspent by Romney 10-1, Huckabee nevertheless scored a major upset in the Iowa caucuses, coming in first and beating Romney by 9 points. | ||
'''Voter behavior''' | |||
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225980/ Dem. entrance polls] | *[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225980/ Dem. entrance polls] | ||
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228177/ GOP entrance polls] | *[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228177/ GOP entrance polls] | ||
Line 120: | Line 124: | ||
The GOP pre-caucus polls in Iowa showed Huckabee at 29% and Romney at 28%, trailed by McCain at 11%. Huckabee led among 30-64 year olds, among "very conservative" Republicans, those earning $50,000-$100,000, and Born Again Christians. Romney led among Independents, both the youngest and oldest voters, moderates, and the lowest and highest income groups. John McCain was in third place by virtue of doing well (though not leading) among voters over 55 (especially over 65), and moderates.<ref> Zogby data based on 867 likely caucus–goers; see press release 12-30-07 at [http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1406]</ref> | The GOP pre-caucus polls in Iowa showed Huckabee at 29% and Romney at 28%, trailed by McCain at 11%. Huckabee led among 30-64 year olds, among "very conservative" Republicans, those earning $50,000-$100,000, and Born Again Christians. Romney led among Independents, both the youngest and oldest voters, moderates, and the lowest and highest income groups. John McCain was in third place by virtue of doing well (though not leading) among voters over 55 (especially over 65), and moderates.<ref> Zogby data based on 867 likely caucus–goers; see press release 12-30-07 at [http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1406]</ref> | ||
|} | |||
|valign="top" width="32%"| | |||
== | {|cellpadding="5" style="background-color:#D1ECD1; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:10px; font-size: 85%;" | ||
|<center><B><big>New Hampshire:</big><BR><U><big>January 8</big></U></b></center><BR> | |||
After his win in Iowa, Obama led in all the polls by an average of 10 points in New Hampshire, but Clinton stunned the political world by beating Obama 39%-37%, with Edwards at 17%. | After his win in Iowa, Obama led in all the polls by an average of 10 points in New Hampshire, but Clinton stunned the political world by beating Obama 39%-37%, with Edwards at 17%. | ||
McCain won the GOP contest by 37%-32% over Romney, who had previously dominated the polls in the Granite State. Huckabee ran third at 11%; about 11% of the state's Republicans are evangelicals. | McCain won the GOP contest by 37%-32% over Romney, who had previously dominated the polls in the Granite State. Huckabee ran third at 11%; about 11% of the state's Republicans are evangelicals. | ||
'''Voter behavior''' | |||
* [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228191/ GOP exit polls] | * [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228191/ GOP exit polls] | ||
* [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225995/ Dem exit polls] | * [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225995/ Dem exit polls] | ||
Obama did best among men, younger voters, independents, and college graduates, while Clinton led by wide margins among women, poorer voters, union members, registered Democrats and older voters--that is, her voter profile resembled the old [[New Deal Coalition]].<ref> See NBC report at [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22551718/], and CNN report at [http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/08/democrat.results/]</ref> | Obama did best among men, younger voters, independents, and college graduates, while Clinton led by wide margins among women, poorer voters, union members, registered Democrats and older voters--that is, her voter profile resembled the old [[New Deal Coalition]].<ref> See NBC report at [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22551718/], and CNN report at [http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/08/democrat.results/]</ref> | ||
|} | |||
===Michigan: | |valign="top" width="32%"| | ||
{|cellpadding="5" style="background-color:#D1ECD1; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:10px; font-size: 85%;" | |||
|<center><B><big>Michigan:</big><BR><U><big>January 15</big></U></b></center><BR> | |||
The Michigan primary was won by Clinton on Jan. 15 with 56% of the vote, but her main opponents had withdrawn and supported an "uncommitted" ticket. The reason was the national party stripped Michigan of all its delegates for breaking the national rules on primary dates. | The Michigan primary was won by Clinton on Jan. 15 with 56% of the vote, but her main opponents had withdrawn and supported an "uncommitted" ticket. The reason was the national party stripped Michigan of all its delegates for breaking the national rules on primary dates. | ||
After unexpected defeats in Iowa and New Hampshire, Romney promised to fight on, but stopped his TV ads in South Carolina (which has a primary on Jan. 19) to concentrate on the Jan. 15 Michigan primary in the state where he was born and his father was governor. Romney regained momentum by a 10 point win in Michigan over McCain.<ref> Michael Luo and Michael Cooper, "Focus Shifts to South Carolina for Romney and Rivals." [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/17/us/politics/17repubs.html ''New York Times'' Jan 17, 2008] </ref> | After unexpected defeats in Iowa and New Hampshire, Romney promised to fight on, but stopped his TV ads in South Carolina (which has a primary on Jan. 19) to concentrate on the Jan. 15 Michigan primary in the state where he was born and his father was governor. Romney regained momentum by a 10 point win in Michigan over McCain.<ref> Michael Luo and Michael Cooper, "Focus Shifts to South Carolina for Romney and Rivals." [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/17/us/politics/17repubs.html ''New York Times'' Jan 17, 2008] </ref> | ||
'''Voter behavior''' | |||
* [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228184/ DEM exit poll] | * [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228184/ DEM exit poll] | ||
* [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228184/ GOP exit poll] | * [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228184/ GOP exit poll] | ||
Line 145: | Line 152: | ||
McCain did win among those consider the War in Iraq the top issue—McCain 41% Romney 31%. However, among those who considered the broader War on Terror as most important McCain and Romney were tied at 31%.<ref> Rasmussen Reports, [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/michigan_exit_polls_show_challenges_for_mccain "Michigan Exit Polls Show Challenges for McCain," Jan 16, 2008 online]</ref> | McCain did win among those consider the War in Iraq the top issue—McCain 41% Romney 31%. However, among those who considered the broader War on Terror as most important McCain and Romney were tied at 31%.<ref> Rasmussen Reports, [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/michigan_exit_polls_show_challenges_for_mccain "Michigan Exit Polls Show Challenges for McCain," Jan 16, 2008 online]</ref> | ||
|} | |||
|- | |||
|valign="top" width="32%"| | |||
{|cellpadding="5" style="background-color:#D1ECD1; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:10px; font-size: 85%;" | |||
|<center><B><big>Nevada:</big><BR><U><big>January 19</big></U></b></center><BR> | |||
'''Voter behavior''' | |||
[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225994/ DEM exit poll] | *[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225994/ DEM exit poll] | ||
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228190/ GOP exit poll] | |||
[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228190/ GOP exit poll] | |||
As 28% of Democrats turned out, Clinton added Hispanics to her coalition of women, older and poorer Democrats, and outpolled Obama 51-45. Obama refused to concede because he won one more convention delegate than she. 15% were Hispanics; 64% of them favored Clinton. 15% were black; 83% of them favored Obama. Obama has strong support among secular voters while Clinton carried Catholics, Jews and white Protestants. Most Republican candidates ignored the state, except for Romney who won 51%; half his supporters were Mormons. Only 11% of the state's registered Republicans showed up. | As 28% of Democrats turned out, Clinton added Hispanics to her coalition of women, older and poorer Democrats, and outpolled Obama 51-45. Obama refused to concede because he won one more convention delegate than she. 15% were Hispanics; 64% of them favored Clinton. 15% were black; 83% of them favored Obama. Obama has strong support among secular voters while Clinton carried Catholics, Jews and white Protestants. Most Republican candidates ignored the state, except for Romney who won 51%; half his supporters were Mormons. Only 11% of the state's registered Republicans showed up. | ||
|} | |||
===South Carolina: | |valign="top" width="32%"| | ||
{|cellpadding="5" style="background-color:#D1ECD1; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:10px; font-size: 85%;" | |||
|<center><B><big>South Carolina:</big><BR><U><big>January 19(R) & January 26(D)</big></U></b></center><BR> | |||
In the first contest to test the mood of southern voters, McCain edged Huckabee 33%-30%, while Thompson edged out Romney for third place, 16%-15%. More than half of the TV commercials in the primary were Romney ads, but he gave up a few days early to solidify his lead in Nevada caucuses the same day. Allegations of dirty tricks and illegal campaigning, reappeared, but were not as nasty as reported back in the McCain-Bush contest in 2000. | In the first contest to test the mood of southern voters, McCain edged Huckabee 33%-30%, while Thompson edged out Romney for third place, 16%-15%. More than half of the TV commercials in the primary were Romney ads, but he gave up a few days early to solidify his lead in Nevada caucuses the same day. Allegations of dirty tricks and illegal campaigning, reappeared, but were not as nasty as reported back in the McCain-Bush contest in 2000. | ||
Line 160: | Line 173: | ||
Clinton and Obama are using opposite tactics to get out their black supporters. Clinton depends on the established African American political networks, based around prominent politicians and religious leaders, as well as barber shops and beauty parlors that reach the lower-income voters. Clinton's traditional approach involves money--for example hiring a state representative at $20,000 a month, who in turns gives out "walking-around money," or "street money" to local supporters to guarantee turnout. Obama, eschewing the old techniques, has brought in out-of state organizers, many of them white, to create a new campaign apparatus from scratch. They have circumvented the established black political gentry and try to reach the voters directly. They discovered they had to publicize that Obama was black. With consciousness of skin color a factor in the African American community, the organizers featured appearances by Obama's wife, Michelle Obama, whose darker complexion carries a special meaning when contrasted to the lighter skin tone of her husband. "It was important for people to see that Obama wasn't putting on airs by marrying a woman lighter than him," explained Obama's South Carolina political director. "You think a thing like that wouldn't matter, but here it does, very much."<ref> Christopher Cooper, Valerie Bauerlein and Corey Dade, "New Machine: In South, Democrats' Tactics May Change Political Game," [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120105705756408791.html?mod=rss_Politics_And_Policy Wall Street Journal Jan. 23 2008]</ref> | Clinton and Obama are using opposite tactics to get out their black supporters. Clinton depends on the established African American political networks, based around prominent politicians and religious leaders, as well as barber shops and beauty parlors that reach the lower-income voters. Clinton's traditional approach involves money--for example hiring a state representative at $20,000 a month, who in turns gives out "walking-around money," or "street money" to local supporters to guarantee turnout. Obama, eschewing the old techniques, has brought in out-of state organizers, many of them white, to create a new campaign apparatus from scratch. They have circumvented the established black political gentry and try to reach the voters directly. They discovered they had to publicize that Obama was black. With consciousness of skin color a factor in the African American community, the organizers featured appearances by Obama's wife, Michelle Obama, whose darker complexion carries a special meaning when contrasted to the lighter skin tone of her husband. "It was important for people to see that Obama wasn't putting on airs by marrying a woman lighter than him," explained Obama's South Carolina political director. "You think a thing like that wouldn't matter, but here it does, very much."<ref> Christopher Cooper, Valerie Bauerlein and Corey Dade, "New Machine: In South, Democrats' Tactics May Change Political Game," [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120105705756408791.html?mod=rss_Politics_And_Policy Wall Street Journal Jan. 23 2008]</ref> | ||
'''Voter behavior''' | |||
* [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228202/ GOP exit poll] | * [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228202/ GOP exit poll] | ||
* [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228202/ DEM exit poll] | |||
McCain won moderates and independents, and scored well among the large active-duty and retired military population. His supporters were more upscale (in terms of education and income) and more moderate (in terms of social issues) than Huckabee's. Many deeply religious voters flocked to Mike Huckabee, while nonevangelical conservatives splintered among McCain, Romney, Thompson, and Huckabee.<ref> See [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#SC summary results]; [http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/01/20/mccain_won_over_moderates_in_sc/ Alan Fram and Mike Mokrzycki, "McCain won over moderates in S.C." AP Report, Jan. 20, 2008]</ref> | McCain won moderates and independents, and scored well among the large active-duty and retired military population. His supporters were more upscale (in terms of education and income) and more moderate (in terms of social issues) than Huckabee's. Many deeply religious voters flocked to Mike Huckabee, while nonevangelical conservatives splintered among McCain, Romney, Thompson, and Huckabee.<ref> See [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#SC summary results]; [http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/01/20/mccain_won_over_moderates_in_sc/ Alan Fram and Mike Mokrzycki, "McCain won over moderates in S.C." AP Report, Jan. 20, 2008]</ref> | ||
South Carolina proved racially polarized. About 55% of the voters were black, and they gave Obama 78% of their vote, compared to 19% for Clinton and 2% for Edwards, who won the primary there in 2004. Indeed, the Democratic National Committee gave the state an early primary in order to feature the black vote. <ref> Mark Z. Barabak, "Obama easily wins heated S.C. primary," [http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-carolina27jan27,0,3866781.story ''Los Angeles Times'' Jan. 27, 2008]; Gary Langer and Brian Hartman, "Black Voters Lift Obama to S.C. Victory; Obama Showing Among White Voters in S.C. Indicates Uphill Battle Ahead," [http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Vote2008/story?id=4195368&page=1 ABC News Jan. 26, 2008]</ref> | South Carolina proved racially polarized. About 55% of the voters were black, and they gave Obama 78% of their vote, compared to 19% for Clinton and 2% for Edwards, who won the primary there in 2004. Indeed, the Democratic National Committee gave the state an early primary in order to feature the black vote. <ref> Mark Z. Barabak, "Obama easily wins heated S.C. primary," [http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-carolina27jan27,0,3866781.story ''Los Angeles Times'' Jan. 27, 2008]; Gary Langer and Brian Hartman, "Black Voters Lift Obama to S.C. Victory; Obama Showing Among White Voters in S.C. Indicates Uphill Battle Ahead," [http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Vote2008/story?id=4195368&page=1 ABC News Jan. 26, 2008]</ref> | ||
|} | |||
===Florida: | |valign="top" width="32%"| | ||
{|cellpadding="5" style="background-color:#D1ECD1; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:10px; font-size: 85%;" | |||
|<center><B><big>Florida:</big><BR><U><big>January 29</big></U></b></center><BR> | |||
Florida, with 18 million people, is a microcosm of the GOP: part Southern, part northern, part Republican establishment, part evangelical, with many conservative Cubans as well. Romney, the best funded candidate, ran more commercials in the state's numerous TV markets than all his opponents together. Of 8,012 TV spots, Romney aired 4,475, followed by 3,067 for Rudy Giuliani and a mere 470 for the cash-strapped McCain campaign. | Florida, with 18 million people, is a microcosm of the GOP: part Southern, part northern, part Republican establishment, part evangelical, with many conservative Cubans as well. Romney, the best funded candidate, ran more commercials in the state's numerous TV markets than all his opponents together. Of 8,012 TV spots, Romney aired 4,475, followed by 3,067 for Rudy Giuliani and a mere 470 for the cash-strapped McCain campaign. | ||
Line 175: | Line 190: | ||
In the Democratic race Clinton won by a landslide, with 50% to 33% for Obama and 14% for Edwards. However the Democratic National Committee stripped Florida of all its delegates because it set its primary too early; candidates were not allowed to campaign there in any way, but were allowed to fundraise in the state. That decision has angered Florida Democrats and seriously weakened their morale for the fall elections.<ref> Bob Moser, "Fumbling Florida: Have Democrats already blown their biggest swing state," ''The Nation'' Dec. 17, 2007, pp 20-24</ref> | In the Democratic race Clinton won by a landslide, with 50% to 33% for Obama and 14% for Edwards. However the Democratic National Committee stripped Florida of all its delegates because it set its primary too early; candidates were not allowed to campaign there in any way, but were allowed to fundraise in the state. That decision has angered Florida Democrats and seriously weakened their morale for the fall elections.<ref> Bob Moser, "Fumbling Florida: Have Democrats already blown their biggest swing state," ''The Nation'' Dec. 17, 2007, pp 20-24</ref> | ||
'''Voter behavior''' | |||
[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225974 DEM exit poll] | * [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225974 DEM exit poll] | ||
* [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228171/ GOP exit poll] | |||
[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228171/ GOP exit poll] | |} | ||
|} | |||
==="Tsunami Tuesday": Feb 5=== | ==="Tsunami Tuesday": Feb 5=== | ||
Nearly half the country chooses its delegates on Feb. 5 in a complex maze of rules. The Democrats have a proportional system, and the GOP uses mostly winner-take-all.<ref> for explanation, maps and statistics, see [http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/article.php?id=FRC2008013101 Rhodes Cook, "Super Tuesday," in ''Sabato's CrystalBall '08'' Jan. 31, 2008]</ref> | Nearly half the country chooses its delegates on Feb. 5 in a complex maze of rules. The Democrats have a proportional system, and the GOP uses mostly winner-take-all.<ref> for explanation, maps and statistics, see [http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/article.php?id=FRC2008013101 Rhodes Cook, "Super Tuesday," in ''Sabato's CrystalBall '08'' Jan. 31, 2008]</ref> |
Revision as of 11:38, 1 February 2008
The United States will hold its 55th quadrennial presidential election on November 4, 2008. The rules are very complicated, and the race is long and expensive; the contenders by mid-January 2008 have already spent some $400 million seeking the nomination of the Republican and Democratic parties.
The leading Democratic contenders for the nomination are Senator Hillary Clinton, and Senator Barack Obama, trailed by several also-rans. Clinton leads Obama among Democrats nationwide by 43%-34%.[1] They face off next in the "tsunami Tuesday" primary in 21 states on Feb. 5.
Among the Republicans the frontrunner is currently Arizona Senator John McCain. His most serious opponent is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who trails McCain in most of the states voting on Feb. 5. Also in contention is former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, who leads in polls in Georgia and is tied with McCain in Missouri. In nationwide polls of Republican voters in mid-January 2008, McCain is currently ahead with 27% support, followed by Romney at 20% and Huckabee at 19%.[2] They next face off in the important Florida primary on Jan. 29.
Each party will officially name its ticket at its national convention in late August for the Democrats and early September for the GOP; the great majority of delegates will be selected in February and March--almost half will be selected in a 24 state "Tsunami Tuesday" on Feb. 5.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has been making preparations for the possibility of becoming an independent candidate. As a multi-billionaire he has the capacity to finance his own campaign without outside contributions or federal matching funds. Former Green Party and independent Presidential candidate Ralph Nader has indicated he would consider running if Clinton is the Democratic nominee.[3]
This election will select the 44th President of the United States and the 47th Vice President; their terms will begin Jan. 20, 2009. President George W. Bush, who has served two terms, is ineligible to run. Vice President Dick Cheney has long said he would not run. No one close to the Bush administration is in the race, and it has not favored any candidate.
Polls in early 2008 show a competitive November election, between top Democratic candidates (in poll standings) Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama vs. John McCain, while Clinton and Obama are currently ahead of the other Republicans.[4]
Democrats in 2007
In the Democratic race, throughout 2007 Clinton had a wide lead over Obama and Edwards, but Obama gained rapidly in early 2008, while Edwards faded.
Democratic Contenders
|
|
Republicans in 2007
GOP Contenders
|
|
|
2008
The Republican primaries shows a contest in turmoil, which may indicate the splintering of the Reagan coalition of social conservatives, the religious right, national-defense hawks, and advocates of low taxes. McCain started with a large lead but collapsed in the spring, because of grass roots opposition to his liberal stance on immigration, and bad financial strategy that left the campaign broke. But McCain soldiered on, making a comeback in early January, 2008, and winning the New Hampshire primary by 37%-32% for Romney. Rudy Giuliani, the former Mayor of New York, used his heroic image from the 9-11 Attack, and promise of a strong counter-terrorism policy, to vault to the lead in mid-2007, despite moderate social policies that the large conservative wing disliked. In early December, however, his negatives were catching up and he fell from the 30% to the 20% level nationally, and ran a weak fourth in New Hampshire at 9%. His strategy involves a comeback in the Florida primary.[27] Hollywood actor and former senator Fred Thompson entered the race late, but appealed to many conservatives looking for another Ronald Reagan. His ineffective campaign style led to a steady erosion of support; he polled 1% in New Hampshire and dropped out after a weak third-place in South Carolina. Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, by reversing previous moderate positions, suddenly became a hard-line conservative spokesman. His Mormon religion, however, caused distrust among the religious conservatives who bulk large in some primaries. Romney's strategy was to pour millions of dollars (much of it his personal money) into Iowa and New Hampshire, hoping that victories there on January 3 and 8, 2008, would generate massive favorable publicity. That publicity supposedly would propel him into a dominant position in the Super Tuesday primaries on Feb. 5, 2008, when 45% of the delegates will be chosen.
Every prediction and game plan was shattered in November, when Mike Huckabee, a little known former governor of Arkansas, shot to the top of the polls and won in Iowa. His base comprises evangelical Christians, who comprise 35% of national GOP voters. Evangelicals comprise 48%-68% of Republicans in the South and border states, 47% in Iowa, and only 11% in New Hampshire. They are 33% in Michigan, 29% in Florida, 27% in California and 14% in New York.[28]
Giuliani
Rudy Giuliani, who gained worldwide fame as mayor of New York City (1993-2001), was the GOP front-runner for most of 2007, but his campaign suddenly falterd in late 2007 and crashed. His best showing in the primaries was a weak 3rd in Florida, and he pulled out and endorsed McCain.
Downplaying his moderate views on abortion, gun control and immigration, Giuliani emphasized his heroic leadership of New York City in the 9-11 Attacks, his cutting crime in New York, and his hard-line against terrorism. Although he campaigned vigorously, he was so focused on his own record that he did not make contact with what the voters were interested in. Worse, he could not shake off charges of corruption. He lost most of his support in the last two months of 2007. He won only 3.5% of voters in Iowa; 8.5% in New Hampshire; 2.8% in Michigan; 4.3% in Nevada and 2.1% in South Carolina. Pulling out of other states, he concentrated all his efforts in a losing battle for Florida, where he ran third with a mere 15%. Analysts noted the more voters saw of Giuliani, the fewer supported him.[29]
After Giuliani's poor showing in Florida, he withdrew from the race and endorsed John McCain.[30] Giuliani's strategy was to concentrate on the winner-take-all primary in Florida, which would deliver more delegates to the winner than all the previous races combined; however, the strategy failed, as national media reports concentrated on the candidates campaigning in the earlier primary races.
The candidates in primaries and caucuses
For daily updates on the polls see [11]
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
"Tsunami Tuesday": Feb 5
Nearly half the country chooses its delegates on Feb. 5 in a complex maze of rules. The Democrats have a proportional system, and the GOP uses mostly winner-take-all.[41]
Current polls[42] show McCain leading in California, New York, New Jersey and other large primary states, except Georgia and Missouri, where Huckabee is strong. Utah, the Mormon stronghold, and his home state of Massachusetts are safe for Romney. His strategy is to focus on the caucus states where his local organizations can turn out supporters most effectively, especially Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia and Minnesota. Romney hopes to be competitive in several primary states, including Missouri, Illinois, Tennessee and Georgia.[43]
Of the 22 states with Democratic contests, Clinton has leads in the polls in 7 of the 10 largest, including California, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Arizona, Missouri. Obama leads in his home state of Illinois, and in Georgia, with its large black vote; Alabama is close.[44]
GOP Polls
Dem Polls
Enthusiasm
Democrats showed much greater enthusiasm for their candidates, turning out in far larger and more enthusiastic rallies, and numbering far more supporters in the Iowa and New Hampshire contests, even though the parties were about evenly balanced in both states in 2000 and 2004. As 2008 opened the Democratic candidates have so far raised $223 million, compared with $152 million for Republican candidates.
A Rasmussen poll at the end of January found that 47% of Democrats say they are "passionately and deeply committed" to their candidate, compared to only 28% of Republicans. Among Democrats who are passionate about a candidate, 53% favor Clinton and 28% Obama. Among passionate Republicans, 34% support Romney, 23% Huckabee, 10% McCain and 10% Paul. Americans under 30 and those who earn less than $40,000 a year are more likely to be passionate about a candidate than older and higher-income Americans. 27% of all voters believe McCain is too old to be President, while 56%, disagree and say he is not too old for the job.[45]
Issues
|
|
|
Mechanics
The rules are complicated and differ for each state and each party.[47]The campaign will have three stages. In January, come the preliminaries, with attention focused on the Iowa caucus (Jan. 3) and the New Hampshire primary (Jan 8), along with contests in Michigan, South Carolina and Florida. Then comes Super Tuesday Feb 5, with 40% of the delegates chosen. After that a string of primaries will be held, which will become increasingly important if the races become deadlocked on Feb. 5. The nominees could possibly be undecided until the national conventions in August/September.
The Democratic party rules are that delegates are awarded to the candidate in proportion to their votes in the primary. In addition the Democrats have "superdelegates" who are party officials who automatically become delegates. The Republicans allow more complex rules. Several states (Florida, with a Jan. 29 primary, and New York and New Jersey with primaries on Feb. 5) have "winner take all" rules that magnify their importance.
Most states use primaries which are ordinary elections. Some are open only to party members; in other like New Hampshire, registered independents can vote in one or the other party primary.
The caucuses are a leftover from 19th century. In Iowa voters to go to a local school or meeting place; Republicans sign in with their vote and leave. Democrats must spend an hour or two in a "caucus" to register their preference. Supporters of candidates with under 15% at that caucus move to another candidate. The Democratic Iowa caucus is a mixture of discussion, debating, a little horse-trading, and some consensus-building between neighbors. Anything can happen, but the media will report on the distribution of support at the end of the evening. (The actual national delegates in Iowa will be chosen months later, and are few in number.)
Third parties choose their candidates at their own, smaller conventions that receive little coverage.
Interest groups
Labor unions
The New Deal Coalition forged by Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1930s dominated national politics until the mid-1960s. One key reason was the close alliance of the party with labor unions. Since the 1960s, however, union membership has fallen by 2/3. In the 1980s unions came under assault from business and the party was unable to help them. Unions in recent years have increased their activism in the election cycle, especially in terms of funding and get-out-the-vote campaigns.
In 2004 and 2006, unions spent a combined $561 million to help elect their preferred candidates (most of them Democrats). That is nearly a 50% increase over the $381 million spent on the previous two campaigns. However they are still outspent by business; in 2000, companies were responsible for three times as much spending as unions. By the 2006 election, companies and their employees spent $491 million on elections, compared with $264 million for labor unions. Labor spent $32 million on its own mailings and television and radio commercials for the 2004 and 2006 elections, a nearly fivefold jump over the previous four years. Polls show 74% of voters who belong to an AFL-CIO-affiliated union voted for the congressional candidate endorsed by their union in 2006, up from 70% in 2004 and 68% in 2002.[48]
Candidates for the Democratic nomination
Top tier
- Hillary Clinton - Former First Lady (1993-2001) and Senator from New York since 2001
- Barack Obama - Senator from Illinois since 2004
Second tier
- Mike Gravel - Former Senator from Alaska (1969-1981)
Withdrawn candidates
- Joe Biden - Senator from Delaware since 1973, head of Senate Foreign Relations Committee
- Christopher Dodd - Senator from Connecticut since 1981
- John Edwards - Former Senator from South Carolina (1998-2004) and Democratic Vice Presidential nominee in 2004
- Dennis Kucinich - Congressman from Ohio
- Bill Richardson - Governor of New Mexico since 2003, Secretary of Energy from 1997-2001, Ambassador to the United Nations from 1997-1998
Candidates for the Republican nomination
Top tier
- Mike Huckabee - Governor of Arkansas 1996-2007
- John McCain - Senator from Arizona 1987-present, sought GOP nomination in 2000 losing to Bush
- Mitt Romney - Governor of Massachusetts, 2002-2007
Second tier
- Alan Keyes - Diplomat under Ronald Reagan and former Republican senatorial nominee from Illinois
- Ron Paul - Congressman from Texas 1997-present, Libertarian Party presidential nominee in 1988
Withdrawn candidates
- Sam Brownback - Senator from Kansas, 1996-present, endorsed McCain
- Jim Gilmore - Governor of Virginia, 1998-2002, currently GOP nominee for 2008 Virginia U.S. Senatorial Election
- Rudy Giuliani - Mayor of New York City 1994-2001
- Duncan Hunter - Congressman from California, 1981-present
- Tom Tancredo - Congressman from Colorado, 1999-present; endorsed Romney
- Fred Thompson - Senator from Tennessee, 1994-2003, television and film actor
- Tommy Thompson - Governor of Wisconsin 1987-2001, Secretary of Health and Human Services 2001-2005; endorsed Giuliani
Current newspaper and magazine reports
External links
- Rhodes Cook, "Super Tuesday," in Sabato's CrystalBall '08 Jan. 31, 2008
- exit polls, from MSNBC
- Delegate counts for major candidates; upcoming schedule
- Campaign journalism, statistical reports on media coverage
notes
- ↑ See the summary, updated daily, at Real Clear Politics
- ↑ See the summary, updated daily, at Real Clear Politics
- ↑ Carla Marinucci. Nader says he may run in 2008, especially if Hillary gets the nomination, San Francisco Chronicle, 15 February 2008.
- ↑ It is much too early to predict the November election, but the national match-ups are used to gauge the electability of candidates. See Real Clear Politics summary of national match-ups
- ↑ see [1]
- ↑ quoted [London Telegraph Dec-9-2007]
- ↑ Brian Friel, Richard E. Cohen and Kirk Victor, "Obama: Most Liberal Senator In 2007" National Journal, Jan. 31, 2008
- ↑ Kristin Jensen and Julianna Goldman, "Clinton, Obama Battle Makes for Partisan Politics Without Unity," Bloomberg News, Jan. 10, 2008
- ↑ See NBC report at [2], and CNN report at [3]; see for detailed exit polls
- ↑ Ben Smith, "Racial tensions roil Democratic race," Politico Jan 11, 2008
- ↑ "Senator Obama's victory speech [in Iowa] was a concise oratorical gem. No candidate in either party can move an audience like he can.... He's...charismatic." Bob Herbert, "The Obama Phenomenon," The New York Times, Jan. 5, 2008; Obama Dec 27. 2007 speech at Obama official website; Jonathan Greenberger, ABC News, May 17, 2007 report
- ↑ Kristin Jensen and Julianna Goldman, "Clinton, Obama Battle Makes for Partisan Politics Without Unity," Bloomberg News, Jan. 10, 2008
- ↑ Brian Friel, Richard E. Cohen and Kirk Victor, "Obama: Most Liberal Senator In 2007" National Journal, Jan. 31, 2008
- ↑ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3134308.ece
- ↑ See NBC report at [4], and CNN report at [5]
- ↑ Carrie Budoff Brown, "Obama faces off against both Clintons," POLITICO Jan 20, 2008
- ↑ Mark Z. Barabak, "Obama easily wins heated S.C. primary," Los Angeles Times Jan. 27, 2008; Larry Sabato, Sabato's Crystal Ball - Vol. VI#3 Jan 24, 2008.
- ↑ . Evangelicals comprise 48%-68% of Republicans in the South and border states, 47% in Iowa, and only 11% in New Hampshire. Andrew Kohut, "The G.O.P.’s Unanswered Question," New York Times Jan. 11, 2008
- ↑ See criticism reported by Jennifer Rubin, "Romney and Huckabee: Club for Growth Comparisons," from Human Events Aug. 24, 2007
- ↑ Dan Balz, "Huckabee's Rise and Rise," Washington Post Dec. 10, 2007; Michael D. Shear and Juliet Eilperin, "Suddenly, Huckabee Is in Romney's Rearview Mirror," Washington Post Nov. 25, 2007; "Shields and Brooks Mull Iowa Election Push, Baseball Scandal" PBS, Dec. 14, 2007
- ↑ Perry Bacon Jr., "The Key in South Carolina: Huckabee Fails to Get Decisive Edge Among Evangelicals," Washington Post Jan. 20, 2008
- ↑ David D. Kirkpatrick, "Huckabee’s Money Woes Curtail Campaign," New York Times Jan. 22. 2008
- ↑ Roger Cohen, "McCain's comeback," International Herald Tribune Jan. 16, 2008
- ↑ Roger Cohen, "McCain's comeback," International Herald Tribune Jan. 16, 2008; For voting details see CNN at [6]
- ↑ John M. Broder, "McCain, Long a G.O.P. Maverick, Is Gaining Mainstream Support," New York Times Jan. 28, 2008; Adam Nagourney, "McCain’s Victory in a Party-Only Primary Raises the Hurdles for Romney," New York Times Jan. 30, 2008
- ↑ Adam Nagourney, "McCain’s Victory in a Party-Only Primary Raises the Hurdles for Romney," New York Times Jan. 30, 2008
- ↑ For current polls see [7]
- ↑ Andrew Kohut, "The G.O.P.’s Unanswered Question," New York Times Jan. 11, 2008
- ↑ Matthew Continetti, "The Giuliani Implosion: From frontrunner to also-ran in eight short weeks," The Weekly Standard Jan. 21, 2008; Justin Wolfers, "How Rudy's Bet Went Wrong," Wall Street Journal Jan. 23, 2008; Michael Powell and Michael Cooper, "For Giuliani, a Dizzying Free-Fall", New York Times Jan. 30, 2008
- ↑ Giuliani Exits Race, Endorses McCain, Associated Press, 30 January 2008.
- ↑ Zogby data based on 867 likely caucus–goers; see press release 12-30-07 at [8]
- ↑ See NBC report at [9], and CNN report at [10]
- ↑ Michael Luo and Michael Cooper, "Focus Shifts to South Carolina for Romney and Rivals." New York Times Jan 17, 2008
- ↑ Rasmussen Reports, "Michigan Exit Polls Show Challenges for McCain," Jan 16, 2008 online
- ↑ Cathleen Decker and Seema Mehta, "Clinton, Obama reach new level of rancor," Los Angeles Times Jan 22. 2008
- ↑ Christopher Cooper, Valerie Bauerlein and Corey Dade, "New Machine: In South, Democrats' Tactics May Change Political Game," Wall Street Journal Jan. 23 2008
- ↑ See summary results; Alan Fram and Mike Mokrzycki, "McCain won over moderates in S.C." AP Report, Jan. 20, 2008
- ↑ Mark Z. Barabak, "Obama easily wins heated S.C. primary," Los Angeles Times Jan. 27, 2008; Gary Langer and Brian Hartman, "Black Voters Lift Obama to S.C. Victory; Obama Showing Among White Voters in S.C. Indicates Uphill Battle Ahead," ABC News Jan. 26, 2008
- ↑ Adam Nagourney, "No Quick Knockouts as Races Move to New Terrain," New York Times Jan, 20, 2008; Doyle McManus, "Florida becomes showdown state for GOP," Los Angeles Times Jan. 20, 2008; Elizabeth Holmes, "With a Crowded Republican Field, Candidates Set Sights on Florida," Wall Street Journal Jan. 20, 2008
- ↑ Bob Moser, "Fumbling Florida: Have Democrats already blown their biggest swing state," The Nation Dec. 17, 2007, pp 20-24
- ↑ for explanation, maps and statistics, see Rhodes Cook, "Super Tuesday," in Sabato's CrystalBall '08 Jan. 31, 2008
- ↑ See latest summary
- ↑ Michael Luo, "Republicans Battle for Votes and Money in California," New York Times Jan. 31, 2008
- ↑ Christopher Cooper and Amy Chozick, "Obama Gains, But Still Lags In Big States," Wall Street Journal January 28, 2008
- ↑ See Rasmussen Report, "Passion Gap: Democrats More Committed to Candidates Than Republicans," Jan. 29, 2008
- ↑ CNN report on exit poll
- ↑ For details see the unofficial site "Election 2008: Primary, Caucus, and Convention Phase"
- ↑ Brody Mullins, "Labor Makes Big Comeback In '08 Races; Ramping Up Spending, Unions Get Voters to Polls; The Battle in Nevada; Wall Street Journal Jan. 18, 2008