CZ:Romanization: Difference between revisions
imported>Brian P. Long (added some ancient languages) |
imported>J. Noel Chiappa (Expand on purpose of page a bit) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
However, in many cases there are several competing standards for writing the language in romanized form; for example, there are two major ways of romanizing Japanese. Even within prescribed romanization methods, there may be variations in spelling and style. To take just one example, the Japanese word for a small police station (交番 or こうばん) could be written kouban, kōban, kooban or koban - four versions in the same 'Hepburn' romanization system. Other languages such as Chinese Hanzi script are even more complicated with dozens of competing romanization methods covering a large variety of dialects of Chinese. If individual authors are allowed to choose the form of Romanization independantly then we will quickly end up with a mess. If one article talks about Guizhou (a province of China), another article mentions Kweichow, and a thrid article discusses Kwei-chow, then the reader will be confused and left wondering if these are all different places or really the same place. A common standard for of romanization is required throughout all Citizendium articles. | However, in many cases there are several competing standards for writing the language in romanized form; for example, there are two major ways of romanizing Japanese. Even within prescribed romanization methods, there may be variations in spelling and style. To take just one example, the Japanese word for a small police station (交番 or こうばん) could be written kouban, kōban, kooban or koban - four versions in the same 'Hepburn' romanization system. Other languages such as Chinese Hanzi script are even more complicated with dozens of competing romanization methods covering a large variety of dialects of Chinese. If individual authors are allowed to choose the form of Romanization independantly then we will quickly end up with a mess. If one article talks about Guizhou (a province of China), another article mentions Kweichow, and a thrid article discusses Kwei-chow, then the reader will be confused and left wondering if these are all different places or really the same place. A common standard for of romanization is required throughout all Citizendium articles. | ||
This page provides | This page provides a defined process to be used in each language to create standards to use when romanizing foreign words on the Citizendium; it also provides links to the policies (and discussion of the policies, which should take place on the appropriate Talk: page) for varous languages. Once agreement is reached, those decisions will form policy. | ||
{{TOC-right}} | {{TOC-right}} | ||
Revision as of 22:43, 29 April 2008
The Citizendium will sometimes require that words not normally written using the English alphabet appear in articles in a form that readers unfamiliar with the original languages will understand. Where words are transliterated from one script to the Latin (Roman) alphabet, this is known as 'romanization'.
However, in many cases there are several competing standards for writing the language in romanized form; for example, there are two major ways of romanizing Japanese. Even within prescribed romanization methods, there may be variations in spelling and style. To take just one example, the Japanese word for a small police station (交番 or こうばん) could be written kouban, kōban, kooban or koban - four versions in the same 'Hepburn' romanization system. Other languages such as Chinese Hanzi script are even more complicated with dozens of competing romanization methods covering a large variety of dialects of Chinese. If individual authors are allowed to choose the form of Romanization independantly then we will quickly end up with a mess. If one article talks about Guizhou (a province of China), another article mentions Kweichow, and a thrid article discusses Kwei-chow, then the reader will be confused and left wondering if these are all different places or really the same place. A common standard for of romanization is required throughout all Citizendium articles.
This page provides a defined process to be used in each language to create standards to use when romanizing foreign words on the Citizendium; it also provides links to the policies (and discussion of the policies, which should take place on the appropriate Talk: page) for varous languages. Once agreement is reached, those decisions will form policy.
Modern Languages
Please add titles and language links below as necessary and start discussion on the new pages.
East Asian languages
Ancient Languages
Also see
| Citizendium Content Policy | ||
|---|---|---|
| Approval Standards | Article Mechanics | Subpages | Importing material from other sources | Citable articles |
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"| |}