Diagnostic imaging: Difference between revisions
imported>Daniel Mietchen (made one phrase more clear) |
imported>Robert Badgett No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The interpretation of radiographs may be facilitated by: | The interpretation of radiographs may be facilitated by: | ||
* access to prior images<ref name="pmid9419549">{{cite journal |author=Aideyan UO, Berbaum K, Smith WL |title=Influence of prior radiologic information on the interpretation of radiographic examinations |journal=Acad Radiol |volume=2 |issue=3 |pages=205–8 |year=1995 |month=March |pmid=9419549 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> | * access to prior images<ref name="pmid9419549">{{cite journal |author=Aideyan UO, Berbaum K, Smith WL |title=Influence of prior radiologic information on the interpretation of radiographic examinations |journal=Acad Radiol |volume=2 |issue=3 |pages=205–8 |year=1995 |month=March |pmid=9419549 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> | ||
* Double reading with arbitration (as opposed to consensus)<ref name="pmid18353630">{{cite journal |author=Taylor P, Potts HW |title=Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate |journal=Eur. J. Cancer |volume=44 |issue=6 |pages=798–807 |year=2008 |month=April |pmid=18353630 |doi=10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.016 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959-8049(08)00128-7 |issn=}}</ref> | * Single reader assisted by computer-aided detection (CAD).<ref name="pmid18832239">{{cite journal| author=Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, Agbaje OF, Wallis MG, James J et al.| title=Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2008 | volume= 359 | issue= 16 | pages= 1675-84 | pmid=18832239 | ||
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=18832239 | doi=10.1056/NEJMoa0803545 }} <!--Formatted by http://sumsearch.uthscsa.edu/cite/--></ref> | |||
* Double reading with arbitration (as opposed to consensus)<ref name="pmid18353630">{{cite journal |author=Taylor P, Potts HW |title=Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate |journal=Eur. J. Cancer |volume=44 |issue=6 |pages=798–807 |year=2008 |month=April |pmid=18353630 |doi=10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.016 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959-8049(08)00128-7 |issn=}}</ref> Double reading may be better than single reader with CAD.<ref name="pmid18353630"/> | |||
* Fusing several types of imaging, such the anatomical detail of CT and the physiological data with PET, into a composite image, perhaps incorporating other antatomically correlated data, such as histopathology. <ref name=>{{citation | * Fusing several types of imaging, such the anatomical detail of CT and the physiological data with PET, into a composite image, perhaps incorporating other antatomically correlated data, such as histopathology. <ref name=>{{citation | ||
| title = Developing a methodology for three-dimensional correlation of PET–CT images and whole-mount histopathology in non-small-cell lung cancer | | title = Developing a methodology for three-dimensional correlation of PET–CT images and whole-mount histopathology in non-small-cell lung cancer | ||
Revision as of 04:07, 25 October 2009
Diagnostic imaging also called medical imaging, refers to the ensemble of methods used to generate visual representations of objects of clinical interest.[1] These include x-rays, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Positron emission tomography (PET), Radionuclide angiography, Single Photon Emission Computed Tompography (SPECT) and ultrasonography. They are usually used to provide supplementary diagnostic information as well as to monitor the progress of disease and/or therapy.
Physicians who devote their careers in the interpretation of these methods are radiologists or nuclear medicine specialists. Both specialties do other work besides imaging, but, in general, radiologists are concerned with images produced by directing an electromagnetic or ultrasound signal through the body to a receiver, where nuclear medicine is concerned with obtaining images from radioactive substances inside the body.
Not all of these methods, such as ultrasonography, use radioactivity. There are evolving methods that look at heat distribution at the skin surface. A Wood's Light, which emits ultraviolet light, is commonly used in dermatology; some skin lesions exhibit fluorescence under this illumination.
The interpretation of radiographs may be facilitated by:
- access to prior images[2]
- Single reader assisted by computer-aided detection (CAD).[3]
- Double reading with arbitration (as opposed to consensus)[4] Double reading may be better than single reader with CAD.[4]
- Fusing several types of imaging, such the anatomical detail of CT and the physiological data with PET, into a composite image, perhaps incorporating other antatomically correlated data, such as histopathology. [5] Composite imaging is technically challenging and requires much computerized image processing, when the various imaging techniques use different coordinate systems, different orientation (e.g. axial vs. planar) and have different levels of resolution.
References
- ↑ Anonymous (2024), Diagnostic imaging (English). Medical Subject Headings. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
- ↑ Aideyan UO, Berbaum K, Smith WL (March 1995). "Influence of prior radiologic information on the interpretation of radiographic examinations". Acad Radiol 2 (3): 205–8. PMID 9419549. [e]
- ↑ Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, Agbaje OF, Wallis MG, James J et al. (2008). "Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography.". N Engl J Med 359 (16): 1675-84. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa0803545. PMID 18832239. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Taylor P, Potts HW (April 2008). "Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate". Eur. J. Cancer 44 (6): 798–807. DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.016. PMID 18353630. Research Blogging.
- ↑ M. Dahele et al., "Developing a methodology for three-dimensional correlation of PET–CT images and whole-mount histopathology in non-small-cell lung cancer", Current Oncology 15 (5): 62-69