User talk:Mal McKee: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris Day |
imported>Chris Day |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==vertical version== | ==vertical version== | ||
Echo the sentiment above. Also did you see the vertical version of subpages | Echo the sentiment above. Also did you see the vertical version of the subpages template? Funny you should bring that up on the subpages talk page as Larry Sanger was just mentioned that vertical might have been the better route. | ||
{{Quotation|If we did have a non-disappearing Definition tab, I'm thinking that writing out "Definition" would be better than "Def" -- the former is clearer and more user-friendly rather than contributor-friendly. But it would make me worried that, as on articles like Life, there would be too many tabs! I'm sure you have worried about wrapping tabs. Remember, I warned this would be a problem with horizontal display of subpage links!!! [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User_talk:Larry_Sanger#Definitions:_what_are_they_and_why_do_we_need_them.3F Source]}} | {{Quotation|If we did have a non-disappearing Definition tab, I'm thinking that writing out "Definition" would be better than "Def" -- the former is clearer and more user-friendly rather than contributor-friendly. But it would make me worried that, as on articles like Life, there would be too many tabs! I'm sure you have worried about wrapping tabs. Remember, I warned this would be a problem with horizontal display of subpage links!!! [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/User_talk:Larry_Sanger#Definitions:_what_are_they_and_why_do_we_need_them.3F Source]}} | ||
I left you a link at the subpages talk page with an example of what it might look like. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 13:03, 14 May 2008 (CDT) | I left you a link at the [[Template_talk:Subpages#Table_wrapping|subpages talk page]] with an example of what it might look like. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 13:03, 14 May 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 12:04, 14 May 2008
Welcome!
Citizendium Getting Started | |||
---|---|---|---|
Quick Start | About us | Help system | Start a new article | For Wikipedians |
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start. You'll probably want to know how to get started as an author. Just look at CZ:Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. Be sure to stay abreast of events via the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list (do join!) and the blog. Please also join the workgroup mailing list(s) that concern your particular interests. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forums is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any constable for help, too. Me, for instance! Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun! Kjetil Ree 18:18, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
- Thank you Kjetil Ree. I'd like to thank whoever was responsible for e-mailing me too.
- From the outset, I'd like to announce the fact that I am an editor of Wikipedia and I have not been without my problems and conflicts there. I may become a former editor of Wikipedia at some point, as I have become jaded with a few things in regard to that particular 'encyclopaedia'.
- On a more positive note however, I see this as an opportunity for a fresh start, in a sense, in my desire to learn and to collate, disseminate, organise and present information on topics I am interested in so that others might also benefit.
- I had been impressed with what I perceived as being a more mature approach to some of the policies I've read up on so far, which convinced me to apply for an account here. I also like some of the facilities or procedures, such as that installed to create drafts which are then approved (or not).
- It may take me a bit of time to get used to the differences, though I feel confident that people here will guide me in terms of policies and approaches. I look forward to working with experts and hobbyists alike, in an effort to produce ultimately a product which surpasses its rivals. Although a mere human, I plan to work as part of a large team with what ever time I can afford to, or decide to, spend here - all with a similar goal in mind.
- This is my statement of intent. I hope I can become a useful author and source here.
- Anyway, over the next couple of days or weeks, I intend to find a selection of articles which I can improve and/or start and at the same time, to read up on some of the guides and regulations. --Mal McKee 19:13, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
What a winner!
Hey, good job on tagging that left over def redir for speedy! :-) Way to go! J. Noel Chiappa 13:54, 13 May 2008 (CDT)
- Cheers - I'm learnin'! Still trying to get to grips with things here, but hopefully some of you will catch my mistakes as I go! --Mal McKee 14:37, 13 May 2008 (CDT)
vertical version
Echo the sentiment above. Also did you see the vertical version of the subpages template? Funny you should bring that up on the subpages talk page as Larry Sanger was just mentioned that vertical might have been the better route.
If we did have a non-disappearing Definition tab, I'm thinking that writing out "Definition" would be better than "Def" -- the former is clearer and more user-friendly rather than contributor-friendly. But it would make me worried that, as on articles like Life, there would be too many tabs! I'm sure you have worried about wrapping tabs. Remember, I warned this would be a problem with horizontal display of subpage links!!! Source
I left you a link at the subpages talk page with an example of what it might look like. Chris Day 13:03, 14 May 2008 (CDT)