John Napier: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng
imported>Gareth Leng
Line 9: Line 9:


==Logarithms==
==Logarithms==
In 1614, Napier desribed how logarithms could be used to simplify the multiplication of large numbers, and published tables of logarithms to facilitate this. A number, n, is the logarithm of x to "base" b if x = bn. For the base, b, Napier chose to use the number ''e'' (2.7182818). Napier's invention of logarithms was an extremely important advance, and the ease of calculation that this introduced allowed [[Kepler]] to make the breakthrough that underpinned [[Newton]]'s theory of gravitation. In the preface to the ''Mirifici logarithmorum canonis descriptio'', Napier says  
In 1614, Napier described how logarithms could be used to simplify the multiplication of large numbers, and published tables of logarithms to facilitate this. A number, n, is the logarithm of x to "base" b if x = bn. For the base, b, Napier chose to use the number ''e'' (2.7182818). Napier's invention of logarithms was an extremely important advance, and the ease of calculation that this introduced allowed [[Kepler]] to make the breakthrough that underpinned [[Newton]]'s theory of gravitation. In the preface to the ''Mirifici logarithmorum canonis descriptio'', Napier says  
<blockquote>Seeing there is nothing (right well-beloved Students of the Mathematics) that is so troublesome to mathematical practice, nor that doth more molest and hinder calculators, than the multiplications, divisions, square and cubical extractions of great numbers, which besides the tedious expense of time are for the most part subject to many slippery errors, I began therefore to consider in my mind by what certain and ready art I might remove those hindrances. And having thought upon many things to this purpose, I found at length some excellent brief rules to be treated of (perhaps) hereafter. But amongst all, none more profitable than this which together with the hard and tedious multiplications, divisions, and extractions of roots, doth also cast away from the work itself even the very numbers themselves that are to be multiplied, divided and resolved into roots, and putteth other numbers in their place which perform as much as they can do, only by addition and subtraction, division by two or division by three.<ref> English translation in 1616 of original text in Latin (1614) of the preface to ''Mirifici logarithmorum canonis descriptio'' [http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Bookpages/Napier10.jpeg ''Mirifici logarithmorum canonis descriptio''</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>Seeing there is nothing (right well-beloved Students of the Mathematics) that is so troublesome to mathematical practice, nor that doth more molest and hinder calculators, than the multiplications, divisions, square and cubical extractions of great numbers, which besides the tedious expense of time are for the most part subject to many slippery errors, I began therefore to consider in my mind by what certain and ready art I might remove those hindrances. And having thought upon many things to this purpose, I found at length some excellent brief rules to be treated of (perhaps) hereafter. But amongst all, none more profitable than this which together with the hard and tedious multiplications, divisions, and extractions of roots, doth also cast away from the work itself even the very numbers themselves that are to be multiplied, divided and resolved into roots, and putteth other numbers in their place which perform as much as they can do, only by addition and subtraction, division by two or division by three.<ref> English translation in 1616 of original text in Latin (1614) of the preface to ''Mirifici logarithmorum canonis descriptio'' [http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Bookpages/Napier10.jpeg ''Mirifici logarithmorum canonis descriptio''</ref></blockquote>
The book contained just thirty-seven pages of explanation but importantly, ninety pages of tables. [[Laplace]], 200 year later, was to say that logarithms: "...by shortening the labours, doubled the life of the astronomer."
The book contained just thirty-seven pages of explanation but importantly, ninety pages of tables. [[Laplace]], 200 year later, was to say that logarithms: "...by shortening the labours, doubled the life of the astronomer."


 
=="Secret Inventions"==
Amongst Napier's' Secret Inventions ' to defend the country from invasion by King Philip of Spain, was a round chariot whereby its occupants could move while firing through holes in its sides; a ship which could travel under water; and a burning mirror which would consume enemy ships.  
Amongst Napier's' Secret Inventions ' to defend the country from invasion by King Philip of Spain, was a round chariot whereby its occupants could move while firing through holes in its sides; a ship which could travel under water; and a burning mirror which would consume enemy ships.  


==Anti-Catholicism==
Napier was a fervent Protestant (and rabidly anti-Catholic); and in ''A Plaine Discovery of the Whole Revelation of St. John'', which he regarded as his most important work, Napier used the [[Book of Revelation]] to predict the [[Apocalypse]], which he predicted would occur in 1688 or 1700, and he declared that his studies pointed to Pope Clement VIII as being the "Antichrist. Accordingly, he wrote to King James VI:  "Let it be your Majesty's continuall study to reforme the universall enormities of your country, and first to begin at your Majesty's owne house, familie and court, and purge the same of all suspicion of Papists and Atheists and Newtrals, whereof this Revelation forthtelleth that the number shall greatly increase in
Napier was a fervent Protestant (and rabidly anti-Catholic); and in ''A Plaine Discovery of the Whole Revelation of St. John'', which he regarded as his most important work, Napier used the [[Book of Revelation]] to predict the [[Apocalypse]], which he predicted would occur in 1688 or 1700, and he declared that his studies pointed to Pope Clement VIII as being the "Antichrist. Accordingly, he wrote to King James VI:  "Let it be your Majesty's continuall study to reforme the universall enormities of your country, and first to begin at your Majesty's owne house, familie and court, and purge the same of all suspicion of Papists and Atheists and Newtrals, whereof this Revelation forthtelleth that the number shall greatly increase in
these latter daies."  
these latter daies."  


Rumours circulated that Napier was "in league with the powers of darkness", and these are taken seriously in a biography [7] written by Mark Napier, one of John Napier's descendants, who claims that John Napier deliberately played to the superstitions of his servants by going round with a cock which he had covered with soot, pretending it to be his [[familiar spirit]]. <ref> [http://www.johnnapier.com/Default.htm Johnnapier.com]</ref> <ref>http://heritage.scotsman.com/myths.cfm?id=41962005 Scotsman article about Napier's interest in the occult</ref>
==Napier and the Powers of Darkness==
Rumours circulated that Napier was "in league with the powers of darkness", and these are taken seriously in a biography written by Mark Napier (a descendant), who claims that John Napier deliberately played to the superstitions of his servants by going round with a cock which he had covered with soot, pretending it to be his [[familiar spirit]]. <ref> [http://www.johnnapier.com/Default.htm Johnnapier.com]</ref> <ref>http://heritage.scotsman.com/myths.cfm?id=41962005 Scotsman article about Napier's interest in the occult</ref>


Napier is said to have once used this rooster to establish which of his servants had been stealing from his home. He shut the suspects in a dark room with the rooster one at a time, telling them to stroke it, and it would then tell Napier who was the thief. It seems that the servants who were innocent had no problem stroking it (but were marked with soot), while the guilty pretended he had but was betrayed by his clean hands. <ref>http://www.johnnapier.com/john_napier_and_the_devil.htm John Napier and the Devil</ref>
Napier is said to have once used this rooster to establish which of his servants had been stealing from his home. He shut the suspects in a dark room with the rooster one at a time, telling them to stroke it, and it would then tell Napier who was the thief. It seems that the servants who were innocent had no problem stroking it (but were marked with soot), while the guilty pretended he had but was betrayed by his clean hands. <ref>http://www.johnnapier.com/john_napier_and_the_devil.htm John Napier and the Devil</ref>

Revision as of 10:51, 13 May 2008

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable, developed Main Article is subject to a disclaimer.

John Napier of Merchistoun (1550 – 4 April 1617), the son of Sir Archibald Napier of Merchiston and Janet Bothwell, was a mathematician, physicist, astrologer and 8th Laird of Merchistoun. His surname appears in many different spellings - Napeir, Nepair, Nepeir, Neper, Napare, Naper, Naipper - but John Napier would most commonly have been written Jhone Neper in his time. Napier is most remembered as the inventor of logarithms and "Napier's bones", (a multiplication tool using a set of numbered ivory rods)[1], and for popularizing the use of the decimal point. He also contributed a mnemonic for formulas used in solving spherical triangles, and two formulas known as Napier's analogies[2]. Napier's birth place, Merchiston Tower, Edinburgh, Scotland, is now part of Napier University. Neper crater, on the Moon, is named after him,[1] as is an asteroid, 7096 Napier. After dying of gout, Napier was buried in St Cuthbert's Church, Edinburgh.

Little is known about John Napier's early years, but a letter survives written by the Bishop of Orkney, who was John's uncle, to Archibald Napier when John was eleven years old:-

I pray you, schir, to send your son Jhone to the schuyllis; oyer to France or Flandaris; for he can leyr na guid at hame, nor get na proffeitt in this maist perullous worlde ... [3]

Napier entered St Andrew's University a the age of 13, where he became passionately interested in theology. There is no record of his having graduated, and it appears that he probably learned his mathematics elsewhere, possibly during his travels in Europe. In 1571, Napier returned to Scotland, and the following year married Elizabeth Stirling, daughter of Scottish mathematician James Stirling (1692-1770), and bought a castle at Gartnes. The couple had two children before Elizabeth died in 1579. Napier later married Agnes Chisholm, with whom he had ten children. When his father died in 1608, Napier and his family moved into Merchiston Castle, where he lived the rest of his life. There, he became known as "Marvellous Merchiston" for the mechanisms he built to improve his crops and cattle.

Logarithms

In 1614, Napier described how logarithms could be used to simplify the multiplication of large numbers, and published tables of logarithms to facilitate this. A number, n, is the logarithm of x to "base" b if x = bn. For the base, b, Napier chose to use the number e (2.7182818). Napier's invention of logarithms was an extremely important advance, and the ease of calculation that this introduced allowed Kepler to make the breakthrough that underpinned Newton's theory of gravitation. In the preface to the Mirifici logarithmorum canonis descriptio, Napier says

Seeing there is nothing (right well-beloved Students of the Mathematics) that is so troublesome to mathematical practice, nor that doth more molest and hinder calculators, than the multiplications, divisions, square and cubical extractions of great numbers, which besides the tedious expense of time are for the most part subject to many slippery errors, I began therefore to consider in my mind by what certain and ready art I might remove those hindrances. And having thought upon many things to this purpose, I found at length some excellent brief rules to be treated of (perhaps) hereafter. But amongst all, none more profitable than this which together with the hard and tedious multiplications, divisions, and extractions of roots, doth also cast away from the work itself even the very numbers themselves that are to be multiplied, divided and resolved into roots, and putteth other numbers in their place which perform as much as they can do, only by addition and subtraction, division by two or division by three.[4]

The book contained just thirty-seven pages of explanation but importantly, ninety pages of tables. Laplace, 200 year later, was to say that logarithms: "...by shortening the labours, doubled the life of the astronomer."

"Secret Inventions"

Amongst Napier's' Secret Inventions ' to defend the country from invasion by King Philip of Spain, was a round chariot whereby its occupants could move while firing through holes in its sides; a ship which could travel under water; and a burning mirror which would consume enemy ships.

Anti-Catholicism

Napier was a fervent Protestant (and rabidly anti-Catholic); and in A Plaine Discovery of the Whole Revelation of St. John, which he regarded as his most important work, Napier used the Book of Revelation to predict the Apocalypse, which he predicted would occur in 1688 or 1700, and he declared that his studies pointed to Pope Clement VIII as being the "Antichrist. Accordingly, he wrote to King James VI: "Let it be your Majesty's continuall study to reforme the universall enormities of your country, and first to begin at your Majesty's owne house, familie and court, and purge the same of all suspicion of Papists and Atheists and Newtrals, whereof this Revelation forthtelleth that the number shall greatly increase in these latter daies."

Napier and the Powers of Darkness

Rumours circulated that Napier was "in league with the powers of darkness", and these are taken seriously in a biography written by Mark Napier (a descendant), who claims that John Napier deliberately played to the superstitions of his servants by going round with a cock which he had covered with soot, pretending it to be his familiar spirit. [5] [6]

Napier is said to have once used this rooster to establish which of his servants had been stealing from his home. He shut the suspects in a dark room with the rooster one at a time, telling them to stroke it, and it would then tell Napier who was the thief. It seems that the servants who were innocent had no problem stroking it (but were marked with soot), while the guilty pretended he had but was betrayed by his clean hands. [7]

References

  1. published in his Rabdologiae in 1617
  2. Napier's Analogis
  3. John Napier biography]
  4. English translation in 1616 of original text in Latin (1614) of the preface to Mirifici logarithmorum canonis descriptio [http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Bookpages/Napier10.jpeg Mirifici logarithmorum canonis descriptio
  5. Johnnapier.com
  6. http://heritage.scotsman.com/myths.cfm?id=41962005 Scotsman article about Napier's interest in the occult
  7. http://www.johnnapier.com/john_napier_and_the_devil.htm John Napier and the Devil