Boiling point/Approval: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt |
imported>Milton Beychok m (→Author: Milton Beychok: Added listing of changes made during the current re-approval process.) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
::Then, a few day ago, I added the new photo of boiling water to the intro section. | ::Then, a few day ago, I added the new photo of boiling water to the intro section. | ||
As you can see, all of my edits were very minor and trivial (in my opinion). [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 21:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | As you can see, all of my edits were very minor and trivial (in my opinion). [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 21:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
:The major additions made to the article (as of this date) by Henry Padlecklas are useful, well written and should be included in the current re-approval. However, the section he plans on researching, writing and adding in the future (exactly when is not known) will probably call for another re-approval at that time. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 00:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
::As discussed on the article's Talk page, I made a minor revision to the lede to comply with comments by Sandy Harris and Peter Schmitt. Peter Schmitt also made a minor lede revision. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 00:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::I also made some minor formatting changes to the LaTeX equation and its parameters to comply with comments from Peter Jackson. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 00:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
=== Peter Schmitt === | === Peter Schmitt === | ||
The changes made to the approved versions are minor revisions and improvements that do not affect its scientific content. | The changes made to the approved versions are minor revisions and improvements that do not affect its scientific content. | ||
I recommend approval. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 11:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC) | I recommend approval. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 11:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:34, 17 February 2012
| Howard C. Berkowitz nominated the version dated December 27, 2008, 01:00 (ET, GMT-5) of this article for approval. The Engineering Workgroup, Chemistry Workgroup and Physics Workgroup oversaw this approval and the article was approved on, or around, January 3, 2009. |
Approval of an updated version
Author: Milton Beychok
These are the minor (almost trivial) changes made since the article was approved:
- (1) On Feb. 21, 2009; Apr. 17, 2010; and May 1, 2011, I added internal wiki links to other CZ articles.
- (2) On Sept. 11, 2009, I added these three words to a sentence naming the Clausius-Clapeyron equation: "this form of".
- (3) On August 11, 2011, I replaced an inactive external hyper-link with an active one.
- (4) On On Sept. 21, 2010, I improved the vapor pressure chart by placing small black circles on the chart to emphasize the boiling points.
- Then, a few day ago, I added the new photo of boiling water to the intro section.
As you can see, all of my edits were very minor and trivial (in my opinion). Milton Beychok 21:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- The major additions made to the article (as of this date) by Henry Padlecklas are useful, well written and should be included in the current re-approval. However, the section he plans on researching, writing and adding in the future (exactly when is not known) will probably call for another re-approval at that time. Milton Beychok 00:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- As discussed on the article's Talk page, I made a minor revision to the lede to comply with comments by Sandy Harris and Peter Schmitt. Peter Schmitt also made a minor lede revision. Milton Beychok 00:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- I also made some minor formatting changes to the LaTeX equation and its parameters to comply with comments from Peter Jackson. Milton Beychok 00:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Peter Schmitt
The changes made to the approved versions are minor revisions and improvements that do not affect its scientific content. I recommend approval. --Peter Schmitt 11:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)