The Oldest Confession: Difference between revisions
imported>Hayford Peirce (→The critics: added a sentence to the lede, rearranged by dates -- will continue to rewrite, though) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (rewrote the Time assessment) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{TOC-right}} | {{TOC-right}} | ||
'''The Oldest Confession''', published by [[Appleton-Century-Crofts]] in 1958, was the first of 25 novels by the American political novelist and satirist [[Richard Condon]]. Along with | '''The Oldest Confession''', published by [[Appleton-Century-Crofts]] in 1958, was the first of 25 novels by the American political novelist and satirist [[Richard Condon]]. Along with some of his other early works, particularly ''[[The Manchurian Candidate]]'', it was the basis for a relatively transient Condon cult. Superficially, it is what today would be called a [[Caper story|caper story]] or caper novel, a subspecies of the [[Crime novel|crime novel]]—generally a light-hearted romp in which a gang of disparate characters bands together to pull off a substantial robbery from a seemly impregnable site, the acknowledged master of which was the late [[Donald E. Westlake]]. | ||
In spite of adhering to most of the informal rules of this genre, however, which include alternating comedy with scenes of dramatic tension and suspense and always building towards a powerful and surprising climax, Condon ends up by thumbing his nose at most of these conventions and, for the last third of the book, it is clearly out-and-out tragedy that he is writing rather than comedy or straight entertainment. It also becomes apparent that, throughout the book, he has been writing about the [[Human condition|human condition]] rather than merely regaling the reader with the story of a outrageous theft, no matter how ingenious its details. With this initial novel, Condon clearly laid out the parameters for his next 24: a fast-moving, mostly tongue-in-cheek, semi-thriller narrative aimed at the general reader, peppered with occasional moments of grotesque horror and violence, all recounted by an omniscient narrator with a keen sense of irony and sardonicism, and always overlaid, to a greater or lesser degree, by Condon's very deeply felt attitudes about America, business, money, greed, ethics, and morality. | In spite of adhering to most of the informal rules of this genre, however, which include alternating comedy with scenes of dramatic tension and suspense and always building towards a powerful and surprising climax, Condon ends up by thumbing his nose at most of these conventions and, for the last third of the book, it is clearly out-and-out tragedy that he is writing rather than comedy or straight entertainment. It also becomes apparent that, throughout the book, he has been writing about the [[Human condition|human condition]] rather than merely regaling the reader with the story of a outrageous theft, no matter how ingenious its details. With this initial novel, Condon clearly laid out the parameters for his next 24: a fast-moving, mostly tongue-in-cheek, semi-thriller narrative aimed at the general reader, peppered with occasional moments of grotesque horror and violence, all recounted by an omniscient narrator with a keen sense of irony and sardonicism, and always overlaid, to a greater or lesser degree, by Condon's very deeply felt attitudes about America, business, money, greed, ethics, and morality. | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
If, the next time out, he can manage to open up and write more personally without marring his exceedingly refined sense of literary form, then we shall really be seeing a book. As things are now, no apologies are necessary to anyone for this is quite an impressive debut.</blockquote> | If, the next time out, he can manage to open up and write more personally without marring his exceedingly refined sense of literary form, then we shall really be seeing a book. As things are now, no apologies are necessary to anyone for this is quite an impressive debut.</blockquote> | ||
[[Time magazine|''Time'' magazine]], the leading midbrow American weekly for most of the 20th century, did not review ''The Oldest Confession''. Over the next 30 years, however, they mentioned it at least six times, always upholding it as | [[Time magazine|''Time'' magazine]], the leading midbrow American weekly for most of the 20th century, did not review ''The Oldest Confession''. Over the next 30 years, however, they mentioned it at least six times, always upholding it as containing superior qualities that Condon's later novels generally failed to meet: | ||
*A few years later, in a review of his third novel, ''Time'' magazine called ''The Oldest Confession'' "fine, mordant". <ref>''Time'' magazine, "Mixed Fiction", March 28, 1960, at [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,826184,00.html]</ref> | *A few years later, in a review of his third novel, ''Time'' magazine called ''The Oldest Confession'' "fine, mordant". <ref>''Time'' magazine, "Mixed Fiction", March 28, 1960, at [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,826184,00.html]</ref> |
Revision as of 21:36, 30 January 2009
The Oldest Confession, published by Appleton-Century-Crofts in 1958, was the first of 25 novels by the American political novelist and satirist Richard Condon. Along with some of his other early works, particularly The Manchurian Candidate, it was the basis for a relatively transient Condon cult. Superficially, it is what today would be called a caper story or caper novel, a subspecies of the crime novel—generally a light-hearted romp in which a gang of disparate characters bands together to pull off a substantial robbery from a seemly impregnable site, the acknowledged master of which was the late Donald E. Westlake.
In spite of adhering to most of the informal rules of this genre, however, which include alternating comedy with scenes of dramatic tension and suspense and always building towards a powerful and surprising climax, Condon ends up by thumbing his nose at most of these conventions and, for the last third of the book, it is clearly out-and-out tragedy that he is writing rather than comedy or straight entertainment. It also becomes apparent that, throughout the book, he has been writing about the human condition rather than merely regaling the reader with the story of a outrageous theft, no matter how ingenious its details. With this initial novel, Condon clearly laid out the parameters for his next 24: a fast-moving, mostly tongue-in-cheek, semi-thriller narrative aimed at the general reader, peppered with occasional moments of grotesque horror and violence, all recounted by an omniscient narrator with a keen sense of irony and sardonicism, and always overlaid, to a greater or lesser degree, by Condon's very deeply felt attitudes about America, business, money, greed, ethics, and morality.
Origins
In 1955 Condon, a longtime New York publicist and Hollywood employee of various studios, was the publicity agent for The Pride and the Passion, a film starring Frank Sinatra and Sophia Loren being shot in Spain. As he writes in his memoir, And Then We Moved to Rossenarra, he was present at a scene being filmed in the ancient rectory of the Escorial, the massive palace and cathedral outside Madrid. The enormous lights needed to film the scene [1]
"revealed dozens upon dozens of great masterpieces of paintings that had not been seen centuries, hung frame touching frame—the work of Goya, Velasquez, the great Dutch masters, and the most gifted masters of the Italian Renaissance...The idea of masterpieces of Spanish painting hanging in stone castles all over Spain, high and invisible in the darkness, stayed with me and gradually formed itself into a novel called The Oldest Confession....
Back in New York, Condon began turning his initial concept into a screenplay—until his wife pointed out, correctly, that he was writing it in the past tense instead of the present, which is obligatory for screenplays, and that it should be turned into a novel. Condon followed her advice and the book was published to favorable reviews not long later.[2]
The story
The dozens of great masterpieces that Condon had glimpsed hanging in the darkness of the Escorial became, in The Oldest Confession, paintings hanging in the main residence of Doña Blanca Conchita Hombria y Arias de Ochoa y Acebal, Marquesa de Vidal, Condesa de Ocho Pinas, Vizcondesa Ferri, Duquesa de Dos Cortes, a 29-year-old beauty who is the wealthiest woman in Spain. The long-forgotten paintings are the object of an American criminal named James Bourne, who has leased a hotel in Madrid for three and a half years, during which time he has successfully stolen numerous other valuable paintings from across Spain. His method is simple, though arduous and dangerous in execution: he replaces the original paintings with undetectable forgeries executed by Jean Marie Calvert, a Parisian artist who is the world's greatest copyist.
Painted in Paris, the reproductions are brought into Spain by Bourne's wife, an educated young American named Eve Lewis who loves Bourne in spite of his unabashed criminality. In the first few dozen pages of the book Bourne successfully steals three masterpieces from the castle of his friend the Duchess of Dos Cortes and arranges for his wife to smuggle them to Paris for a highly profitable sale. When she arrives in Paris, however, she discovers that the mailing tube in which the paintings were being carried is now empty. The rest of the book is the narrative of their downhill path, as well as that of most of those people unlucky enough to have found themselves in their orbit. By the last page of what has apparently begun as a light-hearted caper story, all of the principle characters, and some of the minor ones, are either dead, among the walking-dead, or incarcerated for life. The very last words of the book are an apt summation: "His ruined face stared. She screamed. She screamed again. She could not stop screaming."
The characters
Like most of the characters in Condon's books, those in The Oldest Confession have little pretention to being true-to-life: they are, for the most part, colorfully drawn grotesques or funny hats. One of Condon's great talents, however, is imbuing even his most exaggerated characters with enough life-like or sympathetic features that their trials and often hideously unpleasant fates can be deeply poignant.
James Bourne, the protagonist, and anti-hero of the book is, curiously enough, perhaps the least interesting person in the book, a superficially likable character, tall, very physically powerful, an intelligent American in his middle 30s who straightforwardly enunciates one of Condon's recurring themes: that all businessmen are, by their very nature, both immoral and criminal. Bourne has learned this by working as a young man in his father's insurance business for a number of years; he has been driven ineluctably to the conclusion that all businessmen are, by definition, crooks and that it is, therefore, no crime at all to steal from them, and, by a perhaps dubious philosophical extension, even from those who are actually friends of yours. The only truly honest people, he states throughout the book, are those who are avowedly criminal to begin with. But in spite of Bourne's brooding introversion, and his apparently genuine love for his wife, he is, we discover as the book progresses, a totally self-absorbed and totally amoral person, a man ready to destroy, through his absolute callousness, obliviousness, and solipsism, all those around him.
Bourne, the protagonist, is far from appearing in every scene. The number of other characters, however, is relatively small. Like Bourne, who, at least in his own mind, is the world's greatest criminal genius, many of them are also superlatives in their own right:
- Bourne's wife, Eve Lewis, a young American who has come to Paris and, through a number of lovers, quickly learned a number of languages. After becoming Bourne's lover and criminal accomplice, she now travels with a large number of passports in various names.
- Jean Marie Calvert, the unequaled French copyist
- His wife, Lula, who is barely sketched in beyond: "Lalu looked like a nursery doll. Her voice was higher than a dog's whistle... The sounds she made were like a well filled with drunken canaries."
- The nonpareil Duchess of Dos Cortes and her lover:
- Cayetano Jiminez, the world's greatest matador
- Homer Pickett, an absurd, compulsively talkative backwoods American congressman from downstate Illinois who is, improbably, the world's greatest authority on Spanish paintings
- The congressman's drunken wife who sees life through a glass of absinthe
- Dr. Victoriano Muñoz, a wealthy, half-mad Spanish nobleman obsessed by the injustices done to his family a hundred years earlier by the painter Goya, and who has a live cat draped about him as a permanent part of his persona; in spite of his substantial wealth, he feels that he lives in a state of impoverishment
- Lawyer Chern, a Swiss lawyer who makes a brief but important appearance before coming to a gruesome end
- Various minor characters such as English gangsters, Spanish customs officials and lawyers, and employees of Bourne's hotel.
The critics
Gerald Walker, in the New York Times of June 22, 1958, wrote a favorable review called "Urbane Insiders" that somehow managed to completely avoid giving his readers much more than even a cursory clue as to what the book was about. One of his paragraphs (omitted here) was devoted to another, earlier work by another author about art forgeries, but, aside from that hint, his review is little more than generalities. It was, nevertheless, a fine inaugural reception in a most important media outlet for a hitherto unknown 43-year-old author:
Unlike most other first novels, Richard Condon's is a fully controlled job of writing rather than an ardent grope. Written throughout with painstaking grace, not one scene or description is ever thrown away or treated in a commonplace manner. Everything is handled, and handled well, from the viewpoint of the cosmopolitan insider who knows everything there is to know about such urbane things as art critics, European customs inspectors, wire services, bullfights and fine food and drink.
And yet the one thing the author is unable to convey is any feeling of depth, of real mortality unfolding before the reader. The deterioration of James Bournes, Ivy League master criminal, is singularly unmoving even as one stunningly dramatic scene or ingeniuous plot-turn follows another....
If, the next time out, he can manage to open up and write more personally without marring his exceedingly refined sense of literary form, then we shall really be seeing a book. As things are now, no apologies are necessary to anyone for this is quite an impressive debut.
Time magazine, the leading midbrow American weekly for most of the 20th century, did not review The Oldest Confession. Over the next 30 years, however, they mentioned it at least six times, always upholding it as containing superior qualities that Condon's later novels generally failed to meet:
- A few years later, in a review of his third novel, Time magazine called The Oldest Confession "fine, mordant". [3]
- In its 1961 review of Condon's fourth novel, Time wrote admiringly that, "A Condon novel has the sound and shape of a bagful of cats. In The Oldest Confession, The Manchurian Candidate and Some Angry Angel, Condon garnered fans with accounts, written in messianic exasperation, of criminal endeavor, fate's falling cornices, widespread venality...." [4]
- A 1971 Time review cites the "foaming manias" of The Oldest Confession, along with the assessment that, "Condon was never a satirist: he was a riot in a satire factory. He raged at Western civilization and every last one of its works." [5]
- Three years later, in yet another attack on his latest book, Time wrote: "His early books, The Oldest Confession, The Manchurian Candidate and A Talent for Loving, are among the maddest funny novels of the last couple of decades. They seemed to have been written by Mephistopheles, raucous with glee at the insane excesses of the human creature." [6]
- In 1977 Time, reviewing Condon's latest work, grudgingly admits that "Condon's style, which has seemed preachy and sodden in recent years, achieves some of the snap and malice that enlivened such earlier works as The Oldest Confession and The Manchurian Candidate." [7]
- In 1988, Time wrote, in another review: "In Condon's mad early novels—The Oldest Confession, The Manchurian Candidate—marvelous characters seethed with venality and obsession." [8]
Publication and the movies
Even before it was published in April of that year, twelve film companies had initiated talks about purchasing rights to it, a very unusual amount of interest for an unpublished first novel. The forthcoming book, "Condon explained without divulging details of the plot, 'Is one of need. Half the need, love. The other half, greed.'" [9] The movie version was released in 1962 as The Happy Thieves, starring Rex Harrison and Rita Hayworth, and was dismissed by The New York Times as a "limp herring" of "the devastating first novel." [10]
Stylistic characteristics
The novel offers first glimpses of many of the stylistic tricks that became typical of all his later novels, among them, as the playwright George Axelrod once put it, "the madness of his similies, the lunacy of his metaphors". A selection of these from the opening pages:
The duchess was... a tribal yo-yo on a string eight hundred years long....[11]
Bourne always sat uncommonly still... a monument to his own nerves which bayed like bloodhounds at the moon of his ambition.[12]
...the giant gestures of throwing the ball from the long baskets as Van Gogh might have tried to throw off despair only to have it bound back at him from some crazy new angle.[13]
Also making a debut was Condon's delight in creating long lists of madcap and strangely juxaposed items such as:
...the dutchess [inherited] the ownership of approximately eighteen per cent of the population of Spain inclusive with farms, mines, factories, breweries, houses, forests, rocks, vineyards and holdings in eleven countries of the world including shares in a major league baseball club in North America, an ice cream company in Mexico, quite a few diamonds in South Africa, a Chinese restaurant on Rue François 1er in Paris, a television tube factory in Manila, and in geisha houses in Nagasaki and Kobe. [14]
Notes
- ↑ And Then We Moved to Rossenarra: or, The Art of Emigrating, by Richard Condon, Dial Press, New York, 1973, second printing, page 147
- ↑ ibid, page 150
- ↑ Time magazine, "Mixed Fiction", March 28, 1960, at [1]
- ↑ Time magazine, "A Shortage of Cats", July 21, 1961, at [2]
- ↑ Time magazine, "Cheese", March 4, 1971, at [3]
- ↑ Time magazine, "Obscurity Now", June 24, 1974, at [4]
- ↑ Time magazine, "Royal Flush", May 30, 1977, at [5]
- ↑ Time magazine, "Bookends", September 19, 1988, at [6]
- ↑ The New York Times, February 9, 1958, On Local Movie Fronts, by A. H. Weiler
- ↑ Ibid. February 5, 1962, Screen: 'Happy Thieves'; Appears on Bill with 'Season of Passion'
- ↑ The Oldest Confession, Richard Condon, paperback edition, Four Square, London, 1965, page 6
- ↑ Ibid. page 8
- ↑ Ibid. page 13
- ↑ Ibid. pages 80-81