User talk:Dmitrii Kouznetsov/Analytic Tetration: Difference between revisions
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov |
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Consider function <math>~v=F-\Gamma~</math> on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation <math>~v(z+1)~=~z~v(z)~</math> | Consider function <math>~v=F-\Gamma~</math> on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation <math>~v(z+1)~=~z~v(z)~</math> | ||
Hence, <math>~v~has a [[meromorphic]] continuation to <math>~\mathbb{C}~</math>; | Hence, <math>~v~</math> has a [[meromorphic]] continuation to <math>~\mathbb{C}~</math>; | ||
and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument. | and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument. | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<math>~-n~</math>, <math>~n\in \mathbb{N} </math> by | <math>~-n~</math>, <math>~n\in \mathbb{N} </math> by | ||
<math>~v(z+1)=z~v(z)~</math>. | <math>~v(z+1)=z~v(z)~</math>. | ||
In the range <math>~ 1\le \Re(z) <2 ~</math>, <math>~v(z)~<math> is pounded. It is because function <math>~ \Gamma ~</math> is bounded there. | |||
Then <math>~v(z)~</math> is also restricted on <math>~\mathbb{S}~</math>, | |||
because <math>~v(z)!</math> and <math>~v(1-z)!</math> have the same values on | |||
<math>~\mathbb{S}~</math>. Now <math>~q(z+1)=-q(z)~</math>, hence <math>~q~</math> is bounded on whole <math>~\mathbb{C}~</math>, and by the | |||
[[Liouville Theorem]], <math>~q(z)=q(1)=0</math>. Hence, <math>~v=0~</math> | |||
and <math>~F=\Gamma~</math>. | |||
(end of proof) | |||
===Theorem T2 (about exponential)=== | ===Theorem T2 (about exponential)=== |
Revision as of 05:54, 29 September 2008
Henryk Trappmann 's theorems
This is approach to the Second part of the Theorem 0, which is still absent in the main text.
Copypast from http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/showthread.php?tid=165&pid=2458#pid2458
Theorem T1. (about Gamma function)
Let be holomorphic on the right half plane
let for all such that .
Let .
Let be bounded on the strip .
Then is the gamma function.
Proof see in Reinhold Remmert, "Funktionnentheorie", Springer, 1995. As reference is given: H. Wielandt 1939. (Mein Gott, so old reference!)
Consider function on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation Hence, has a meromorphic continuation to ; and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument.
While , we have , hence, has a holomorphic continuation to 0 and also to each , by .
In the range , is bounded there.
Then is also restricted on , because and have the same values on . Now , hence is bounded on whole , and by the Liouville Theorem, . Hence, and .
(end of proof)
Theorem T2 (about exponential)
Let be solution of , , bounded in the strip .
Then is exponential on base , id est, .
Proof. We know that every other solution must be of the form where is a 1-periodic holomorphic function. This can roughly be seen by showing periodicity of .
,
where is also a 1-periodic function,
While each of and is bounded on , must be bounded too.
Theorem T3 (about Fibbonachi)
Let .
Let
Let
Let
Then
Discussion. Id est, is Fibbonachi function.
Theorem T4 (about tetration)
Let .
Let each of and satisfies conditions
- for
- is holomorphic function, bounded in the strip .
Then
Discussion. Such is unique tetration on the base .