imported>Paul Wormer |
imported>Paul Wormer |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{subpages}} | | {{subpages}} |
| In [[mechanics]], a '''virial''' of a stable system of ''n'' particles is a quantity proposed by [[Rudolf Clausius]] in 1870. The virial is defined by | | In [[mechanics]], a '''virial''' of a stable system of ''n'' particles is a quantity proposed by [[Rudolf Clausius]] in 1870.<ref>R. Clausius, ''On Mechanical Theorem Appicable to Heat'', The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, vol. '''40''', 4th series, pp. 122 – 127 (1870). [http://books.google.nl/books?id=GGAEAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA122&lpg=PA122&dq=R.+Clausius,+1870++%22On+a+Mechanical+Theorem+Applicable+to+Heat%22.+Philosophical+Magazine&source=bl&ots=R1r5qreADm&sig=2_mPQeatbLC3XRISgz5IUrfyhhk&hl=nl&ei=9HR5S6auDYaWtgeZlc2ZCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=false Google books]. Note that Clausius still uses the term ''vis viva'' for kinetic energy, but does include the factor ½ in its definition.</ref> |
| | The virial is defined by |
| :<math> | | :<math> |
| \tfrac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^n \mathbf{r}_i \cdot \mathbf{F}_i , | | \tfrac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^n \mathbf{r}_i \cdot \mathbf{F}_i , |
Line 124: |
Line 125: |
|
| |
|
| For instance, for a stable atom (consisting of charged particles with Coulomb interaction): ''k'' = −1, and hence 2⟨''T'' ⟩ = −⟨''V'' ⟩. | | For instance, for a stable atom (consisting of charged particles with Coulomb interaction): ''k'' = −1, and hence 2⟨''T'' ⟩ = −⟨''V'' ⟩. |
| | ==Reference== |
| | <references /> |
Revision as of 10:38, 15 February 2010
In mechanics, a virial of a stable system of n particles is a quantity proposed by Rudolf Clausius in 1870.[1]
The virial is defined by
where Fi is the total force acting on the i th particle and ri is the position of the i th particle; the dot stands for an inner product between the two 3-vectors. Indicate long-time averages by angular brackets. The importance of the virial arises from the virial theorem, which connects the long-time average of the virial to the long-time average ⟨ T ⟩ of the total kinetic energy T of the n-particle system,
Proof of the virial theorem
Consider the quantity G defined by
The vector pi is the momentum of particle i. Differentiate G with respect to time:
Use Newtons's second law and the definition of kinetic energy:
and it follows that
Averaging over time gives:
If the system is stable, G(t) at time t = 0 and at time t = T is finite. Hence, if T goes to infinity, the quantity on the right hand side goes to zero. Alternatively, if the system is periodic with period T, G(T) = G(0) and the right hand side will also vanish. Whatever the cause, we assume that the time average of the time derivative of G is zero, and hence
which proves the virial theorem.
Application
An interesting application arises when the potential V is of the form
where ai is some constant (independent of space and time).
An example of such potential is given by Hooke's law with k = 2 and Coulomb's law with k = −1.
The force derived from a potential is
Consider
Hence
Then applying this for i = 1, … n,
For instance, for a system of charged particles interacting through a Coulomb interaction:
Quantum mechanics
The virial theorem holds also in quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanically the angular brackets do not indicate a time-average, but an expectation value with respect to an exact stationary eigenstate of the Hamiltonian of the system. The theorem will be proved and applied to the special case of a potential that has a rk-like dependence. Everywhere Planck's constant ℏ is taken to be one.
Let us consider a n-particle Hamiltonian of the form
where mj is the mass of the j-th particle. The momentum operator is
Using the self-adjointness of H and the definition of a commutator one has for an arbitrary operator G,
In order to obtain the virial theorem, we consider
Use
Define
Use
and we find
The quantum mechanical virial theorem follows
where ⟨ … ⟩ stands for an expectation value with respect to the exact eigenfunction Ψ of H.
If V is of the form
it follows that
From this:
For instance, for a stable atom (consisting of charged particles with Coulomb interaction): k = −1, and hence 2⟨T ⟩ = −⟨V ⟩.
Reference
- ↑ R. Clausius, On Mechanical Theorem Appicable to Heat, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, vol. 40, 4th series, pp. 122 – 127 (1870). Google books. Note that Clausius still uses the term vis viva for kinetic energy, but does include the factor ½ in its definition.