CZ:Ref:DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0011273: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(started)
 
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(comment)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{cite journal| author=Björk BC, Welling P, Laakso M, Majlender P, Hedlund T, Gudnason G| title=Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009 | journal=PLoS One | year= 2010 | volume= 5 | issue= 6 | pages= e11273 | pmid=20585653 | doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0011273 | pmc=PMC2890572 }}
{{cite journal| author=Björk BC, Welling P, Laakso M, Majlender P, Hedlund T, Gudnason G| title=Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009 | journal=PLoS One | year= 2010 | volume= 5 | issue= 6 | pages= e11273 | pmid=20585653 | doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0011273 | pmc=PMC2890572 }}
:For a sample of 1837 randomly chosen scientific articles published in 2008, the availability via [[Green Open Access]] or [[Gold Open Access]] was found to be about 20% in total in autumn 2009, with significant variations across disciplines.

Latest revision as of 07:34, 11 August 2010

Björk BC, Welling P, Laakso M, Majlender P, Hedlund T, Gudnason G (2010). "Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009". PLoS One 5 (6): e11273. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0011273. PMID 20585653. PMC PMC2890572. Research Blogging[e]

For a sample of 1837 randomly chosen scientific articles published in 2008, the availability via Green Open Access or Gold Open Access was found to be about 20% in total in autumn 2009, with significant variations across disciplines.