Talk:Chiropractic/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>DavidGoodman (arrangement?) |
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The history seems mixed in with the presentation of the theory, which to some extent is unavoidable, but it seems odd to discuss the concept of subluxation _after_ the legal fight with the AMA. [[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 21:52, 2 November 2006 (CST) | The history seems mixed in with the presentation of the theory, which to some extent is unavoidable, but it seems odd to discuss the concept of subluxation _after_ the legal fight with the AMA. [[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 21:52, 2 November 2006 (CST) | ||
I've re-ordered. I think this is basically a good aricle, and that the historical approach is a good way to explain the subject, I've trimmed it down from the WP original, and thrown some detail into the references. I'm now done with this[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 11:06, 7 November 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 12:06, 7 November 2006
The history seems mixed in with the presentation of the theory, which to some extent is unavoidable, but it seems odd to discuss the concept of subluxation _after_ the legal fight with the AMA. DavidGoodman 21:52, 2 November 2006 (CST)
I've re-ordered. I think this is basically a good aricle, and that the historical approach is a good way to explain the subject, I've trimmed it down from the WP original, and thrown some detail into the references. I'm now done with thisGareth Leng 11:06, 7 November 2006 (CST)