Talk:STS-92: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Matthew Varpness No edit summary |
imported>Ori Redler No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There are quite a few articles for NASA missions here and on Wikipedia. I don't know why this particular mission was specifically targeted for deletion. If they are all copied directly from the NASA website and that is not something we want here on CZ, then we should consider deleting all of the related mission articles.--[[User:Matthew Varpness|Matthew Varpness]] 14:01, 15 November 2006 (CST) | There are quite a few articles for NASA missions here and on Wikipedia. I don't know why this particular mission was specifically targeted for deletion. If they are all copied directly from the NASA website and that is not something we want here on CZ, then we should consider deleting all of the related mission articles.--[[User:Matthew Varpness|Matthew Varpness]] 14:01, 15 November 2006 (CST) | ||
:It was not targeted specifically -- it just came up. I think that we should indeed consider deleting them all or tagging them all as "information only" articles (as contrasted with encyclopaedic articles). [[User:Ori Redler|Ori Redler]] 10:17, 17 November 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 11:17, 17 November 2006
There are quite a few articles for NASA missions here and on Wikipedia. I don't know why this particular mission was specifically targeted for deletion. If they are all copied directly from the NASA website and that is not something we want here on CZ, then we should consider deleting all of the related mission articles.--Matthew Varpness 14:01, 15 November 2006 (CST)
- It was not targeted specifically -- it just came up. I think that we should indeed consider deleting them all or tagging them all as "information only" articles (as contrasted with encyclopaedic articles). Ori Redler 10:17, 17 November 2006 (CST)