CZ Talk:Literature Workgroup: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephen Ewen (→Are all workgroup discussions this slow?: Be bold!) |
imported>Kevin Scott Bailey |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:Literature is tiny compared to others. The best way to get attention to whatever it is you'd like to write is just to be bold and write it for now. :-) [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 12:14, 1 December 2007 (CST) | :Literature is tiny compared to others. The best way to get attention to whatever it is you'd like to write is just to be bold and write it for now. :-) [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 12:14, 1 December 2007 (CST) | ||
::Will do, and thanks for the response. I contributed heavily to the ''To Kill a Mockingbird'' article at WP, so I may C&P that, and rework it for CZ. [[User:Kevin Scott Bailey|Kevin Scott Bailey]] 15:51, 2 December 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 16:51, 2 December 2007
Thanks for creating this workgroup. I look forwarding to taking part in it.--Jason Sanford 09:30, 21 November 2006 (CST)
Jason, do join the discussion on the Forum Amal Chatterjee 14:05, 21 November 2006 (CST)
Bonnie Hicks
I know that Sanger has urged authors to focus on major articles, but circumstances in my life have occurred such that I needed a good grasp of the Singaporean author Bonnie Hicks. I therefore thought I would contribute this article to maximize my labor. I am unsure exactly how the approved article nomination works - specifically, whether or not authors as well as editors can so nominate - but I did nominate this article. While the article could go into considerable more detail, I do not think that is appropriate in this case. So here we have my first significant contribution to CZ - one I would never have prior foreseen. Stephen Ewen 02:15, 14 January 2007 (CST)
- Though not familiar with Bonnie Hicks, the article looks well-written and well-researched indeed. Will keep an eye on Hicks in the future - yet another advantage of being part of this! --CM 05:29, 14 January 2007 (CST)
Minor revisions
I just read through the article, which indeed seems to me to be well-researched and amply documented. I have made just two small stylistic revisions, and I think there may be a few other places where a kind of 'copy-editing' editing could strengthen the overall flow of the article. I don't know enough about Hicks to comment on any substantive matters, though I do have some background in, and occasionally teach, postcolonial literature.
Russell Potter 07:32, 14 January 2007 (CST)
- Hi Russel and Carmen. Thanks much. I addressed Russel's referencing concern at Talk:Bonny_Hicks. I did copyedit the article some more but have probably exhausted my own ability at such for now by reason of my proximal investment in the article. Stephen Ewen 19:08, 14 January 2007 (CST)
Are all workgroup discussions this slow?
I joined, but what's the point of the workgroup, if there's no collaboration? Kevin Scott Bailey 02:59, 1 December 2007 (CST)
- Literature is tiny compared to others. The best way to get attention to whatever it is you'd like to write is just to be bold and write it for now. :-) Stephen Ewen 12:14, 1 December 2007 (CST)
- Will do, and thanks for the response. I contributed heavily to the To Kill a Mockingbird article at WP, so I may C&P that, and rework it for CZ. Kevin Scott Bailey 15:51, 2 December 2007 (CST)