CZ Talk:Chemistry Workgroup: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Tito
mNo edit summary
imported>Robert Tito
m (To be approved articles)
Line 10: Line 10:


I have added proposed follow up documents on the [[Talk:Physical chemistry]] page, see there and add or modify please. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 17:15, 20 February 2007 (CST)
I have added proposed follow up documents on the [[Talk:Physical chemistry]] page, see there and add or modify please. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 17:15, 20 February 2007 (CST)
== To be approved articles ==
Please contribute there and add, else we have pages definitive without your approval [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 17:16, 20 February 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 17:16, 20 February 2007

Analytical Chemistry is often referred to by students as "General Chemistry on Steroids". But then again, Inorganic Chemistry is the study of the rest of the periodic table other than primarily carbon-based molecules.

My question is this: Should General Chemistry considered a subgroup of chemistry or just foundational vocabulary and concepts of the other sub-groups? --William Weaver 08:37, 22 November 2006 (CST)

In many instances you see Analytical Chemistry and Anorganic Chemistry put together and abbreviated to AA-Chemistry. To call it general chemistry would be one bridge too far even though the argument seems logical. How do the others feel about it? Robert Tito 19:09, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Chemistry Related Wikipedia Templates

Should we duplicate the templates for physical properties and what not from the Wikipedia (such as the NIOSH diamonds and other assorted goodies) and use them here? or are we going to use a new template set? --Paul Derry 00:14, 15 February 2007 (CST)

I have added proposed follow up documents on the Talk:Physical chemistry page, see there and add or modify please. Robert Tito | Talk 17:15, 20 February 2007 (CST)

To be approved articles

Please contribute there and add, else we have pages definitive without your approval Robert Tito | Talk 17:16, 20 February 2007 (CST)