West Memphis Three: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
(Reverting to Kay Shearin's last: if you want to delete that much text, you must explain your deletions on the talk page.)
imported>K kay shearin
m (getting isbns out of text)
Line 3: Line 3:
The case has been controversial since its beginning, with some believing that the defendants were carrying out some [[Satanism|Satanic]] ritual killing (guilty) and others that the defendants were themselves the victims of a modern "witch hunt" (innocent).  The cable-television network [[HBO]] made two documentaries, starting with the police videotape of the bodies where they were found and including footage from the trials:  ''Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills'' in 1996  and ''Paradise Lost 2: Revelations'' in 1999, both directed and produced by Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky.
The case has been controversial since its beginning, with some believing that the defendants were carrying out some [[Satanism|Satanic]] ritual killing (guilty) and others that the defendants were themselves the victims of a modern "witch hunt" (innocent).  The cable-television network [[HBO]] made two documentaries, starting with the police videotape of the bodies where they were found and including footage from the trials:  ''Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills'' in 1996  and ''Paradise Lost 2: Revelations'' in 1999, both directed and produced by Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky.


Little Rock, Arkansas, investigative journalist Mara Leveritt wrote the definitive book on the subject so far, the 2002 ''Devil's Knot: The True Story of the West Memphis Three''. Several heavy-metal musicians contributed to concerts and/or recordings to raise money for the three defendants, and Echols wrote a book: ''Almost Home: My Life Story Vol. 1'' [ISBN 0-5953-5701-6].  In about 2001, New York DNA lawyer [[Barry C. Scheck|Barry Scheck]], of the [[Innocence Project]] legal clinic at [[Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law|Benjamin Cardozo Law School]] in New York, joined the team of lawyers trying to get post-conviction relief<ref name=Example1>''Post-conviction relief'' is an improvement in the situation of a person who was convicted of a crime.  There are many common kinds of relief, and some of them (such as having the conviction invalidated because new evidence shows the convict did not commit the crime) are available only to a convict who was found guilty at a trial, while others (such as challenging the ''conditions of confinement'' because of prison over-crowding) are also available to persons who pled guilty and so waived having a trial.  An ''appeal'' is part of the trial process itself, not a separate new legal proceeding for ''post-conviction relief''.  A person convicted in a state court may seek ''post-conviction relief'' in that state's court and/or in federal court, depending on the reasons asserted.</ref> for Echols, the only one of the three sentenced to death instead of to life in prison.  In February 2007 an Arkansas lawyer representing Echols announced that he had received the results of [[DNA]] tests those lawyers had arranged (no DNA tests were performed before the trials, and no direct,<ref name=Example2>''Direct evidence'' is evidence that goes to prove (or disprove) the factual issue to be decided, as opposed to ''circumstantial evidence'', which creates a logical inference as to the truth (or falsity) of the proposition:  Example:  A dead body with a knife sticking out of it is ''direct evidence'' that a murder was committed; a blood stain on the deck of a drifting yacht whose owner and anchor are both suddenly missing is ''circumstantial evidence'' that there was a murder.</ref> physical<ref name=Example3>''Physical evidence'' is a tangible object put forward to prove (or disprove) a fact in issue, as opposed to ''documentary evidence'', which may be a report or other written material, or ''testimonial evidence'', which is what a witness swears (in person or in a written affidavit) happened:  Example:  Photos from the security camera are ''physical evidence'' of the robbery, but the statement of the security guard who was there is ''testimonial evidence'', and the investigating officer's report is ''documentary evidence''.</ref> evidence against the defendants was ever introduced) and would be submitting that "significant" evidence to the state's prosecutors shortly.
Little Rock, Arkansas, investigative journalist Mara Leveritt wrote the definitive book on the subject so far, the 2002 ''Devil's Knot: The True Story of the West Memphis Three''. Several heavy-metal musicians contributed to concerts and/or recordings to raise money for the three defendants, and Echols wrote a book: ''Almost Home: My Life Story Vol. 1''.  In about 2001, New York DNA lawyer [[Barry C. Scheck|Barry Scheck]], of the [[Innocence Project]] legal clinic at [[Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law|Benjamin Cardozo Law School]] in New York, joined the team of lawyers trying to get post-conviction relief<ref name=Example1>''Post-conviction relief'' is an improvement in the situation of a person who was convicted of a crime.  There are many common kinds of relief, and some of them (such as having the conviction invalidated because new evidence shows the convict did not commit the crime) are available only to a convict who was found guilty at a trial, while others (such as challenging the ''conditions of confinement'' because of prison over-crowding) are also available to persons who pled guilty and so waived having a trial.  An ''appeal'' is part of the trial process itself, not a separate new legal proceeding for ''post-conviction relief''.  A person convicted in a state court may seek ''post-conviction relief'' in that state's court and/or in federal court, depending on the reasons asserted.</ref> for Echols, the only one of the three sentenced to death instead of to life in prison.  In February 2007 an Arkansas lawyer representing Echols announced that he had received the results of [[DNA]] tests those lawyers had arranged (no DNA tests were performed before the trials, and no direct,<ref name=Example2>''Direct evidence'' is evidence that goes to prove (or disprove) the factual issue to be decided, as opposed to ''circumstantial evidence'', which creates a logical inference as to the truth (or falsity) of the proposition:  Example:  A dead body with a knife sticking out of it is ''direct evidence'' that a murder was committed; a blood stain on the deck of a drifting yacht whose owner and anchor are both suddenly missing is ''circumstantial evidence'' that there was a murder.</ref> physical<ref name=Example3>''Physical evidence'' is a tangible object put forward to prove (or disprove) a fact in issue, as opposed to ''documentary evidence'', which may be a report or other written material, or ''testimonial evidence'', which is what a witness swears (in person or in a written affidavit) happened:  Example:  Photos from the security camera are ''physical evidence'' of the robbery, but the statement of the security guard who was there is ''testimonial evidence'', and the investigating officer's report is ''documentary evidence''.</ref> evidence against the defendants was ever introduced) and would be submitting that "significant" evidence to the state's prosecutors shortly.


== Other books ==
== Cited works ==
* ''Almost Home: My Life Story Vol. 1'' [ISBN 0-5953-5701-6]
* ''Devil's Knot: The True Story of the West Memphis Three''  [ISBN 0-7434-1759-3 (hardback); ISBN 0-7434-1760-7 (paperback)]
* ''Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills'' [UPC 707729117087 (VHS); UPC 767685974438, ISBN 0-7670-8590-6 (DVD)]
* ''Paradise Lost 2: Revelations'' [ISBN 0-7670-3773-1 (VHS); UPC 767685948330, ISBN 0-7670-3774-X (DVD)]
== Other works ==
* ''Blood of Innocents: The True Story of Multiple Murder in West Memphis, Arkansas'' by [[Guy Reel]], Marc Perrusquia & Bartholemew Sullivan [ISBN 078601363X (2000 paperback); ISBN 0786018607 (2007 paperback)]
* ''Blood of Innocents: The True Story of Multiple Murder in West Memphis, Arkansas'' by [[Guy Reel]], Marc Perrusquia & Bartholemew Sullivan [ISBN 078601363X (2000 paperback); ISBN 0786018607 (2007 paperback)]
* ''The Last Pentacle of the Sun: Writings in Support of the West Memphis 3'' [ISBN 1551521628 (2004 paperback)]
* ''The Last Pentacle of the Sun: Writings in Support of the West Memphis 3'' [ISBN 1551521628 (2004 paperback)]
Line 22: Line 27:


''Books''
''Books''
* [http://www.maraleveritt.com/books Devil's Knot: The True Story of the West Memphis Three] @ maraleveritt.com [ISBN 0-7434-1759-3 (hardback); ISBN 0-7434-1760-7 (paperback)]. 
* [http://www.maraleveritt.com/books Devil's Knot: The True Story of the West Memphis Three] @ maraleveritt.com
 
''Movies''
''Movies''
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117293/combined Paradise Lost] @ imdb.com [UPC 707729117087 (VHS); UPC 767685974438, ISBN 0-7670-8590-6 (DVD)]
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117293/combined Paradise Lost] @ imdb.com
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0239894/ Paradise Lost 2] @ imdb.com [ISBN 0-7670-3773-1 (VHS); UPC 767685948330, ISBN 0-7670-3774-X (DVD)]
* [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0239894/ Paradise Lost 2] @ imdb.com


''Commentary''
''Commentary''

Revision as of 00:09, 20 February 2007

The "West Memphis Three" is the collective nickname of three then-teenagers -- Damien Echols (formerly Michael Wayne Hutchison), Jason Baldwin, and Jessie Misskelley, Jr. -- who in 1994 were convicted of the gruesome murder of three eight-year-old boys -- Christopher Byers, Michael Moore, and Stevie Branch -- in West Memphis, Arkansas, on May 5, 1993.

The case has been controversial since its beginning, with some believing that the defendants were carrying out some Satanic ritual killing (guilty) and others that the defendants were themselves the victims of a modern "witch hunt" (innocent). The cable-television network HBO made two documentaries, starting with the police videotape of the bodies where they were found and including footage from the trials: Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills in 1996 and Paradise Lost 2: Revelations in 1999, both directed and produced by Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky.

Little Rock, Arkansas, investigative journalist Mara Leveritt wrote the definitive book on the subject so far, the 2002 Devil's Knot: The True Story of the West Memphis Three. Several heavy-metal musicians contributed to concerts and/or recordings to raise money for the three defendants, and Echols wrote a book: Almost Home: My Life Story Vol. 1. In about 2001, New York DNA lawyer Barry Scheck, of the Innocence Project legal clinic at Benjamin Cardozo Law School in New York, joined the team of lawyers trying to get post-conviction relief[1] for Echols, the only one of the three sentenced to death instead of to life in prison. In February 2007 an Arkansas lawyer representing Echols announced that he had received the results of DNA tests those lawyers had arranged (no DNA tests were performed before the trials, and no direct,[2] physical[3] evidence against the defendants was ever introduced) and would be submitting that "significant" evidence to the state's prosecutors shortly.

Cited works

Other works

  • Blood of Innocents: The True Story of Multiple Murder in West Memphis, Arkansas by Guy Reel, Marc Perrusquia & Bartholemew Sullivan [ISBN 078601363X (2000 paperback); ISBN 0786018607 (2007 paperback)]
  • The Last Pentacle of the Sun: Writings in Support of the West Memphis 3 [ISBN 1551521628 (2004 paperback)]


Legal terms

Whereas in science and engineering specialized terms are called "technical" language, in the field of law words or phrases with specific legal meanings beyond their definitions in ordinary usage are called "words of art" or "terms of art." Here are those meanings for some of those terms in this article:

  1. ↑ Post-conviction relief is an improvement in the situation of a person who was convicted of a crime. There are many common kinds of relief, and some of them (such as having the conviction invalidated because new evidence shows the convict did not commit the crime) are available only to a convict who was found guilty at a trial, while others (such as challenging the conditions of confinement because of prison over-crowding) are also available to persons who pled guilty and so waived having a trial. An appeal is part of the trial process itself, not a separate new legal proceeding for post-conviction relief. A person convicted in a state court may seek post-conviction relief in that state's court and/or in federal court, depending on the reasons asserted.
  2. ↑ Direct evidence is evidence that goes to prove (or disprove) the factual issue to be decided, as opposed to circumstantial evidence, which creates a logical inference as to the truth (or falsity) of the proposition: Example: A dead body with a knife sticking out of it is direct evidence that a murder was committed; a blood stain on the deck of a drifting yacht whose owner and anchor are both suddenly missing is circumstantial evidence that there was a murder.
  3. ↑ Physical evidence is a tangible object put forward to prove (or disprove) a fact in issue, as opposed to documentary evidence, which may be a report or other written material, or testimonial evidence, which is what a witness swears (in person or in a written affidavit) happened: Example: Photos from the security camera are physical evidence of the robbery, but the statement of the security guard who was there is testimonial evidence, and the investigating officer's report is documentary evidence.


External links

Official webpage

Books

Movies

Commentary

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=West_Memphis_Three&oldid=144605"