Archive:The Big Write: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger |
imported>Larry Sanger |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== What is the Big Write? == | == What is the Big Write? == | ||
''If you want to participate in the Big Write, please read this entire document!'' | |||
This is another mass initiative, modeled loosely on [[CZ:The Big Speedydelete|The Big Speedydelete]]. Basically, we are going to sit down and write a lot of basic articles--but ''how'' we're going to do it is, perhaps, interesting. | This is another mass initiative, modeled loosely on [[CZ:The Big Speedydelete|The Big Speedydelete]]. Basically, we are going to sit down and write a lot of basic articles--but ''how'' we're going to do it is, perhaps, interesting. | ||
Each ''Citizendium'' editor may and is encouraged to nominate 3-5 "high priority" topics ([[#The Topics|below]]) in his or her field. | Each ''Citizendium'' editor may and is encouraged to nominate 3-5 "high priority" topics ([[#The Topics|below]]) in his or her field. Articles on these topics shouldn't already exist. Other contributors then sign up to write a "credible start" on the topic. To be a "credible start," an article must be at least 750 words, accurate, unbiased, and well-written. As many people who want to sign up to write on any topic may do so, but everyone who ''does'' sign up to write is then ''obligated'' to do so (and soon, i.e., within a day or two of signing up). For each nominated topic, the editor is committed to reviewing and (if all goes well) blessing the new article as "a credible start." This is not an ''approval,'' but merely the editor's opinion that the article in its present form is ''on its way'' to being a good summation of the topic. The editor offers this blessing [[#The Topics|below]]. | ||
This should not be much work for editors, but by making this small commitment, they can help "jump start" work in their areas. As for article writers, this is an excellent and interesting opportunity to get feedback on your work from professionals. | |||
We would like to have nominations, if possible, from at least 20% of ''Citizendium'' editors, i.e., about 35 editors. More, of course, would be very welcome. That would entail the creation (or review) of 105 to 175 top priority articles. More importantly, it will help us get to know each other and to "jump start" many workgroups. | |||
At some point--after article nominations drop off significantly--we will declare a close to nominations, so that we can declare a definite "end point" to the Big Write. | |||
== Editor instructions == | == Editor instructions == | ||
Revision as of 19:27, 21 February 2007
What is the Big Write?
If you want to participate in the Big Write, please read this entire document!
This is another mass initiative, modeled loosely on The Big Speedydelete. Basically, we are going to sit down and write a lot of basic articles--but how we're going to do it is, perhaps, interesting.
Each Citizendium editor may and is encouraged to nominate 3-5 "high priority" topics (below) in his or her field. Articles on these topics shouldn't already exist. Other contributors then sign up to write a "credible start" on the topic. To be a "credible start," an article must be at least 750 words, accurate, unbiased, and well-written. As many people who want to sign up to write on any topic may do so, but everyone who does sign up to write is then obligated to do so (and soon, i.e., within a day or two of signing up). For each nominated topic, the editor is committed to reviewing and (if all goes well) blessing the new article as "a credible start." This is not an approval, but merely the editor's opinion that the article in its present form is on its way to being a good summation of the topic. The editor offers this blessing below.
This should not be much work for editors, but by making this small commitment, they can help "jump start" work in their areas. As for article writers, this is an excellent and interesting opportunity to get feedback on your work from professionals.
We would like to have nominations, if possible, from at least 20% of Citizendium editors, i.e., about 35 editors. More, of course, would be very welcome. That would entail the creation (or review) of 105 to 175 top priority articles. More importantly, it will help us get to know each other and to "jump start" many workgroups.
At some point--after article nominations drop off significantly--we will declare a close to nominations, so that we can declare a definite "end point" to the Big Write.
Editor instructions
- Choose three to five topics in your field(s) that are very high priority, but about which you have some specialized knowledge.
- List each topic below following this format:
Format:
Name of topic :Reviewed by: ~~~ :Volunteer authors: :A credible start? :Blessed:
Note: the ":" needs to be flush left, it indents a line.
For example:
Epistemology
- Reviewed by: Ed Itor
- Volunteer authors: [authors place names here]
- A credible start? Yes
- Blessed: Ed Itor 19:00, 21 February 2007 (CST)
Please file your topics in alphabetical order, and for your own benefit, write down the name of the topic you're managing.