Talk:Programming language: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert Tito mNo edit summary |
imported>Bruce M. Tindall (big cleanup) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = programming language | |||
| cat1 = Computers | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = n | |||
| status = 2 | |||
| underlinked = n | |||
| cleanup = y | |||
| by = [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]] | |||
}} | |||
== Titel of page == | == Titel of page == | ||
One question, shouldn't the page either be called "Programming language" and then give an overview of what a programming language is, etc. and finally the list it currently contains, or be called "List of programming languages" with the current content? | One question, shouldn't the page either be called "Programming language" and then give an overview of what a programming language is, etc. and finally the list it currently contains, or be called "List of programming languages" with the current content? |
Revision as of 09:00, 5 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Computers Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Bruce M.Tindall |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Titel of page
One question, shouldn't the page either be called "Programming language" and then give an overview of what a programming language is, etc. and finally the list it currently contains, or be called "List of programming languages" with the current content?
The current name "Programming languages" looks very strange and will probably lead to mis-links. there will be a link from programming language to it. And yes tho it actually is a list it also should be the central container from where to find the langiage one is looking for. (the umbrella). Robert Tito | Talk 14:17, 25 February 2007 (CST)
[[Category:Big Write]] Big Write came to a prenaturnal end. Robert Tito | Talk 19:44, 26 February 2007 (CST)
Reference? Or Synopsis?
Personally, I'd like to see the citizendium provide a relatively nice reference to these programming languages, however, due to the large variety that we have should we simply provide a brief synopsis of the language as we're doing now? --Paul Derry 12:22, 7 March 2007 (CST)
list of languages
The list of languages currently in this article is woefully incomplete. WP has some very extensive and complete lists of programming languages already. I know that we should avoid copying WP content within reason, but I think it is rather silly to recreate "lists" of things from scratch, and that (subject to some editing, maybe), lists are better off simply copied off WP. Your thoughts? --Dan 23:32, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
also, i'd agree that the list of languages should be a separate page, which would be linked to from "programming language". seems like that would be logical to do.
I agree there, no pproblem copying some content from WP, XP or what souce as lonmg as our list gets complete. The back linking seems very handy for a walk through. cheers - good suggestion. Robert Tito | [[Talk]] 23:44, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
- Computers Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Computers Advanced Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Computers Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Computers Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Computers External Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Computers Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup