CZ Talk:Topic Informant Workgroup: Difference between revisions
imported>Nancy Sculerati |
imported>Nancy Sculerati |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
At the 2005 Worldcon, I was a participant in one program item out of [http://www.interaction.worldcon.org.uk/program.htm#schedule hundreds]. Does that mean I also can't write anything specific about that convention? I don't feel this is "closely associated", but again, I'd like to get a ruling. [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 10:52, 28 April 2007 (CDT) | At the 2005 Worldcon, I was a participant in one program item out of [http://www.interaction.worldcon.org.uk/program.htm#schedule hundreds]. Does that mean I also can't write anything specific about that convention? I don't feel this is "closely associated", but again, I'd like to get a ruling. [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 10:52, 28 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
---- | |||
:Adjunct question: How close is a "close association"? Does this policy preclude our writing about any group which we're a member of? I suspect that will be problematic for many of us; in my case it rules out a number of associations. Can I not write about Phi Alpha Theta, or the Royal Agricultural Society, e.g.? | :Adjunct question: How close is a "close association"? Does this policy preclude our writing about any group which we're a member of? I suspect that will be problematic for many of us; in my case it rules out a number of associations. Can I not write about Phi Alpha Theta, or the Royal Agricultural Society, e.g.? | ||
:Perhaps we could have guidelines, such as excluding non-profits from this prohibition, or entities one was not a founder of. | :Perhaps we could have guidelines, such as excluding non-profits from this prohibition, or entities one was not a founder of. | ||
Line 13: | Line 16: | ||
:Some clarifications would be appreciated. | :Some clarifications would be appreciated. | ||
:[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 17:41, 2 May 2007 (CDT) | :[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 17:41, 2 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
---- | |||
Here's my opinion: | Here's my opinion: |
Revision as of 17:56, 2 May 2007
Clarification on self-promotion policy
I asked the following on CZ_Talk:Policy_on_Self-Promotion, and it was suggested that I ask here.
I am thinking of writing an article on the World Science Fiction Convention (Worldcon), which is run by a substantially different group of people each year. The entity behind Worldcon is the World Science Fiction Society, whose membership is defined as the members of the next Worldcon (or current one when one is in progress).
I'm on the staff of this year's Worldcon. This definitely rules out writing an article about this specific convention. Should it bar me from ever writing something on the general history of Worldcon? I feel that it should not, but would like to get confirmation.
At the 2005 Worldcon, I was a participant in one program item out of hundreds. Does that mean I also can't write anything specific about that convention? I don't feel this is "closely associated", but again, I'd like to get a ruling. Petréa Mitchell 10:52, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
- Adjunct question: How close is a "close association"? Does this policy preclude our writing about any group which we're a member of? I suspect that will be problematic for many of us; in my case it rules out a number of associations. Can I not write about Phi Alpha Theta, or the Royal Agricultural Society, e.g.?
- Perhaps we could have guidelines, such as excluding non-profits from this prohibition, or entities one was not a founder of.
- It seems as though only students and faculty of educational institutions are exempted from this policy at present. Can we not include alumni and former faculty?
- We have at least one CZ editor who's a highly qualified Boy Scout who presumably will be writing and editing about Scouting. This makes good sense to me: in reality, we're all out to share about...promote, if you will...subjects that we're interested in, and that ususually means subjects with which we are associated.
- Some clarifications would be appreciated.
- Aleta Curry 17:41, 2 May 2007 (CDT)
Here's my opinion:
- Unlike a university or the boys scouts this group is more of a hobbyist group. Some hobbyist groups, like the American Kennel Club are certainly of great interest and are appropriate subjects for articles. However, even so, individual AKC's shows are not appropriate entries because the kennel club world cannot be maintained on Citizendium in that kind of detail for the parallel groups, even if there were AKC people interested in devoting this effort to the AKC. (There are not, to my knowlege-this is a hypothetical example).
- I know nothing about Worldcon, but if it has a long enough history and has been influential in science fiction, then I see no reason why there should not be an entry - meaning ONE article that discusses the organization and its history.
- An article on each of the annual conventions is not -in my mind- something that is maintainable by Citizendium any more than entries on each dog show or each individual national convention of a medical society would be. So, there is no reason that-if done without self promotion, an article cannot be written on the group as a whole, the series of conventions.
- I do not believe this question is actually suitable for the topic informant workgroup as it does not (or should not) involve the biography of a living individual.
- There is no exemption from self promotion by University people. All articles must be neutral - not promotional in nature, and a neutral article can be written by an individual who is associated by the organization. For example, an article on dog shows could be written by individuals who are judges at various kennel clubs. An article on the National Institutes of Health could be written by a grant recipient of the National Institutes of Health.
- No article is acceptable that is a "fan" write-up extolling the virtues of any event or organization, so there is no reason that I can see that you cannot properly write a neutral article on the overall topic of Worldcon and have it fly here. If there is bias or selfpromotion in it, then it will not fly.
My 2 bucks. Nancy Sculerati 18:15, 2 May 2007 (CDT)