Gross Domestic Product: Difference between revisions
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards m (Gross domestic product moved to Gross Domestic Product) |
imported>Nick Gardner (Other indicators) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
In order to provide the information necessary for the preferred method of making international comparisons of GDP, a number of international organisations cooperate <ref> United Nations, Commission of the European Communities, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and World Bank. System of National Accounts 1993 (SNA 1993). Series F, No. 2, Rev. 4 (United Nations publication Sales No. E.94.XVII.4)</ref> to provide "''purchasing power parity''" (PPP) exchange rates. A PPP exchange rate is defined by them as "the number of currency units required to buy goods equivalent to what can be bought with one unit of the currency of the base country, usually the US dollar". The method of calculation and the uses of PPP rates have been explained in an OECD statistics brief <ref>[http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/34/2078177.pdf Paul Shreyer and Francette Koechler ''Purchasing Power Parities –measurement and uses'' OECD Statistics Brief March 2002]</ref>, and are set out in detail in an United Nations handbook <ref> United Nations. Handbook of the International Comparison Programme. Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 62 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.92.XVII.12)</ref> The alternative of using market exchange rates can produce grossly misleading comparisons. For example the OECD brief shows that (as percentages of the USA's GDP) it would overstate Japan’s 1999 GDP by almost 50 per cent and Switzerland’s by over 30 per cent, and give the false impression that both were higher than the USA’s | In order to provide the information necessary for the preferred method of making international comparisons of GDP, a number of international organisations cooperate <ref> United Nations, Commission of the European Communities, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and World Bank. System of National Accounts 1993 (SNA 1993). Series F, No. 2, Rev. 4 (United Nations publication Sales No. E.94.XVII.4)</ref> to provide "''purchasing power parity''" (PPP) exchange rates. A PPP exchange rate is defined by them as "the number of currency units required to buy goods equivalent to what can be bought with one unit of the currency of the base country, usually the US dollar". The method of calculation and the uses of PPP rates have been explained in an OECD statistics brief <ref>[http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/34/2078177.pdf Paul Shreyer and Francette Koechler ''Purchasing Power Parities –measurement and uses'' OECD Statistics Brief March 2002]</ref>, and are set out in detail in an United Nations handbook <ref> United Nations. Handbook of the International Comparison Programme. Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 62 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.92.XVII.12)</ref> The alternative of using market exchange rates can produce grossly misleading comparisons. For example the OECD brief shows that (as percentages of the USA's GDP) it would overstate Japan’s 1999 GDP by almost 50 per cent and Switzerland’s by over 30 per cent, and give the false impression that both were higher than the USA’s | ||
==Other indicators== | |||
It has been argued that the GDP should not be used as a policy target because it takes no account of matters of importance to the community, such as its health and the state of its environment, and there have been several attempts to convert it to a measure of the success of government policies. [[The Human Development Index]] (HDI) <ref>[http://www.eoearth.org/article/Human_Development_Index Human Development Index]</ref> published by the United Nations adds such measures as literacy and life expectancy. The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) <ref>[http://community.foe.co.uk/tools/isew/ Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare ]</ref> published by Friends of the Earth, includes additions for welfare-producing services and deductions for pollution and environmental damage. The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) <ref>[http://www.rprogress.org/sustainability_indicators/genuine_progress_indicator.htm Genuine Progress Indicator]</ref> includes crime and income distribution, in addition to much of what is included in the ISEW. In all of such indicators, the choice of the factors to be included and of the relative weights to be attached to them are solely the result of the personal judgements of their creators. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 08:35, 8 December 2007
Gross national product (GDP) is a total of the outputs recorded in a country’s national accounts. It is the best-known of such totals, and estimates of its growth rate are widely used as indicators of the prospects of inflation or unemployment. Efforts are constantly being made to overcome its limitations for that and other purposes. GDP per capita (that is, divided by total population) is the most frequently used measure of a country's or region's level of economic development; for alternative measures, see Human Development Index.
Definitions
Gross domestic product (GDP) can be defined as the total recorded value of the goods and services produced within an economy. The word "gross" indicates that no deduction is made for the loss of value due to the depreciation of assets, and the word "domestic" indicates that net income from abroad is not included. (If income from abroad is allowed for, gross domestic product becomes gross national product (GNP), and if depreciation is also allowed for, it becomes net national product or simply national income).
GDP can in fact be defined as either the total recorded output of the economy’s producers, or the total recorded expenditure of its investors and consumers, or the total of all recorded payments of wages, interest and rent - all of which totals are, in principle, equal. It is normally stated as "GDP at market prices", which indicates that the prices used include the effects of indirect taxes and subsidies. In an alternative version that matches payments to the factors of production, indirect taxes (such as sales taxes) are deducted, and subsidies (which are the equivalent of negative sales taxes) are added back - and the adjusted total is then termed "GDP at factor cost". Published statistics normally include estimates of "GDP at constant prices", which are obtained by applying approximate price index adjustments to the recorded values of its components. Time-series thus adjusted are commonly referred to as showing "real", as distinct from "nominal", changes of GDP.
The standard methods used for estimating GDP are described in a primer published by the United States Bureau of Economic Analysis[1]
Limitations and adjustments
Household accounts
Among the economic activities that are not recorded in the national accounts is unpaid production within a country’s households. It has been estimated that for Britain such production amounts to over 40 per cent of GDP[2]. That omission can in principle be corrected by constructing household accounts based upon "time use surveys" [3], and several countries are planning to publish "satellite accounts" for that purpose.
New technology
Another limitation of conventional measures of real GDP arises from the failure to make due allowance for the introduction of new technology. For example, the substitution of word-processors for typewriters produced what was really an output increase, but which may well have been treated as a price increase. The economist William Nordhaus has used a study of the changing methods of generating light to suggest that failure to allow for changes in technology had led to significant underestimates of real GDP growth as well as overestimates of inflation. [4] [5], and it has been estimated that failure to take account of quality improvements had for long resulted in underestimates of real GDP growth in the United States of between 0.6 and 1.5 percentage points. [6]. The effects of that failure can sometimes be mitigated by the use of "hedonic price indexes" (as described in the article on the price index) based upon studies of the different prices that people are willing to pay for available quality differences - as is becoming the practice in the United States for the treatment of some high-technology products.
GDP comparisons
Exchange rates
In order to provide the information necessary for the preferred method of making international comparisons of GDP, a number of international organisations cooperate [7] to provide "purchasing power parity" (PPP) exchange rates. A PPP exchange rate is defined by them as "the number of currency units required to buy goods equivalent to what can be bought with one unit of the currency of the base country, usually the US dollar". The method of calculation and the uses of PPP rates have been explained in an OECD statistics brief [8], and are set out in detail in an United Nations handbook [9] The alternative of using market exchange rates can produce grossly misleading comparisons. For example the OECD brief shows that (as percentages of the USA's GDP) it would overstate Japan’s 1999 GDP by almost 50 per cent and Switzerland’s by over 30 per cent, and give the false impression that both were higher than the USA’s
Other indicators
It has been argued that the GDP should not be used as a policy target because it takes no account of matters of importance to the community, such as its health and the state of its environment, and there have been several attempts to convert it to a measure of the success of government policies. The Human Development Index (HDI) [10] published by the United Nations adds such measures as literacy and life expectancy. The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) [11] published by Friends of the Earth, includes additions for welfare-producing services and deductions for pollution and environmental damage. The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) [12] includes crime and income distribution, in addition to much of what is included in the ISEW. In all of such indicators, the choice of the factors to be included and of the relative weights to be attached to them are solely the result of the personal judgements of their creators.
References
- ↑ Measuring the Economy: A Primer on GDP and the National Income and Product Accounts National Bureau for Economic Analysis 2007
- ↑ [1]
- ↑ The UK 2000 Time Use Survey Office of National Statistics 2003
- ↑ William Nordhaus Do real output and real wage measures capture reality? The history of light suggests not. In The Economics of New Goods pp29-66 University of Chicago Press 1997
- ↑ [2]
- ↑ Matthew Shapiro and David Wilcox Mismeasurement in the consumer price index National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No 5590
- ↑ United Nations, Commission of the European Communities, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and World Bank. System of National Accounts 1993 (SNA 1993). Series F, No. 2, Rev. 4 (United Nations publication Sales No. E.94.XVII.4)
- ↑ Paul Shreyer and Francette Koechler Purchasing Power Parities –measurement and uses OECD Statistics Brief March 2002
- ↑ United Nations. Handbook of the International Comparison Programme. Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 62 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.92.XVII.12)
- ↑ Human Development Index
- ↑ Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare
- ↑ Genuine Progress Indicator