Talk:Crystal Palace/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell Potter
No edit summary
imported>Hayford Peirce
(He was Owen, not Owens, I now see)
Line 16: Line 16:


:Hi, Hayford.  No, I hadn't heard of the David Owens lectures.  The CP is an endlessly fascinating topic, though; my first encounter with its historical symoblism was in ''All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity'', by Marshall Berman.  Since then, I've collected books and ephemera on the Palace, and visited the site many times.  Much of what I plan here will draw from my own [http://www.ric.edu/rpotter/cryspal.html Crystal Palace] site.  Best, [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 18:39, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
:Hi, Hayford.  No, I hadn't heard of the David Owens lectures.  The CP is an endlessly fascinating topic, though; my first encounter with its historical symoblism was in ''All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity'', by Marshall Berman.  Since then, I've collected books and ephemera on the Palace, and visited the site many times.  Much of what I plan here will draw from my own [http://www.ric.edu/rpotter/cryspal.html Crystal Palace] site.  Best, [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 18:39, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
::I guess his name was Owen, not Owens.  Here's a paragraph from a 1954 Harvard Crimson article about him: "His reputation for humor is at once Owen's greatest asset and a liability which he is most likely to deplore. Like the Hogarth engravings on his office walls, Owen's lectures are liberally sprinkled with bits of historical paraphernalia, each so interesting in itself that it is likely to detract from the whole. The "Crystal Palace" lecture, featuring lantern slides of a once famous Victorian exhibition, along with Owen's barbed asides, is an example. "I'm sorry it has developed into a kind of stunt or parlor trick. It really has a value in depicting the Victorian era," he remarked in justification." It was still going strong in 1964.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 19:36, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:36, 3 June 2007


Article Checklist for "Crystal Palace/Draft"
Workgroup category or categories History Workgroup, Architecture Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Russell Potter 18:39, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





The Crystal Palace lecture

Did you ever heard (or hear of) the famous Crystal Palace lecture by David Owens, a professor at Harvard and my housemaster at Winthrop House? It started out as just one of the lectures in his course on, I guess, Modern English History or some such, then became so famous that it had to be moved to a much larger venue than his usual classroom. Hundreds of outsiders would come to hear it and watch the slide show.... Hayford Peirce 10:59, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

Hi, Hayford. No, I hadn't heard of the David Owens lectures. The CP is an endlessly fascinating topic, though; my first encounter with its historical symoblism was in All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity, by Marshall Berman. Since then, I've collected books and ephemera on the Palace, and visited the site many times. Much of what I plan here will draw from my own Crystal Palace site. Best, Russell Potter 18:39, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
I guess his name was Owen, not Owens. Here's a paragraph from a 1954 Harvard Crimson article about him: "His reputation for humor is at once Owen's greatest asset and a liability which he is most likely to deplore. Like the Hogarth engravings on his office walls, Owen's lectures are liberally sprinkled with bits of historical paraphernalia, each so interesting in itself that it is likely to detract from the whole. The "Crystal Palace" lecture, featuring lantern slides of a once famous Victorian exhibition, along with Owen's barbed asides, is an example. "I'm sorry it has developed into a kind of stunt or parlor trick. It really has a value in depicting the Victorian era," he remarked in justification." It was still going strong in 1964.... Hayford Peirce 19:36, 3 June 2007 (CDT)