Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>John Stephenson
(Removed category, though I disagree)
Line 19: Line 19:


This obviously is not a Religion Workgroup article.  What do religious scholars know about it?  Conservapedia is politically slanted, first and foremost. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:05, 28 July 2007 (CDT)
This obviously is not a Religion Workgroup article.  What do religious scholars know about it?  Conservapedia is politically slanted, first and foremost. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:05, 28 July 2007 (CDT)
:I have removed <nowiki>[[Category: Religion Workgroup]]</nowiki> given this criticism; however, I'd say it is peripherally to do with that group because of the religious aspect of Conservapedia. Apart from the creationism stuff, they do have a Bible quote-of-the-day on the main page. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 03:38, 28 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 02:38, 28 July 2007


Article Checklist for "Conservapedia"
Workgroup category or categories Topic Informant Workgroup, Computers Workgroup, Politics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by John Stephenson 23:37, 27 July 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Original research?

Do you think my comparison of the block lists for Wikipedia, Citizendium and Conservapedia constitute original research? I'm not sure. If so, delete or modify. John Stephenson 23:36, 27 July 2007 (CDT)

Article count

The real question isn't how many articles there are, but what the total word count is, and how many of words are garbage! --Larry Sanger 00:05, 28 July 2007 (CDT)

This obviously is not a Religion Workgroup article. What do religious scholars know about it? Conservapedia is politically slanted, first and foremost. --Larry Sanger 00:05, 28 July 2007 (CDT)

I have removed [[Category: Religion Workgroup]] given this criticism; however, I'd say it is peripherally to do with that group because of the religious aspect of Conservapedia. Apart from the creationism stuff, they do have a Bible quote-of-the-day on the main page. John Stephenson 03:38, 28 July 2007 (CDT)