Talk:Irrational number: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Michael Hardy (This contains proofs of the irrationality of several numbers; it's more than just a stub.) |
imported>Anthony Argyriou (reply to Michael Hardy) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
: What in the world do you mean by saying they are infinite? They are nothing of the sort. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 20:08, 3 August 2007 (CDT) | : What in the world do you mean by saying they are infinite? They are nothing of the sort. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 20:08, 3 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
::They are infinite in number, and in number density. It is believed that the infinity of the number of irrational numbers is a greater infinity than the infinity of the integers, though it's not known if the number of irrationals is properly aleph-1 or not. | |||
::Two or three proofs that particular numbers are irrational is not nearly as useful as more in-depth discussion of what exactly irrational numbers ''are'', in general. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 01:13, 4 August 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 00:13, 4 August 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Mathematics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Anthony Argyriou 17:14, 2 August 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
This article needs stuff on the theory of irrational numbers - that irrational numbers may be algebraic or transcendental, that they are infinite, etc.. Anthony Argyriou 17:14, 2 August 2007 (CDT)
- What in the world do you mean by saying they are infinite? They are nothing of the sort. Michael Hardy 20:08, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
- They are infinite in number, and in number density. It is believed that the infinity of the number of irrational numbers is a greater infinity than the infinity of the integers, though it's not known if the number of irrationals is properly aleph-1 or not.
- Two or three proofs that particular numbers are irrational is not nearly as useful as more in-depth discussion of what exactly irrational numbers are, in general. Anthony Argyriou 01:13, 4 August 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Mathematics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Mathematics Advanced Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Mathematics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Mathematics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Mathematics External Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Mathematics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup