Talk:Ideal gas law/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>J. Noel Chiappa (→Nice changes Milton: Mayeb /Advanced?) |
imported>Milton Beychok m (→David, how about this?: More dialogue) |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
David, I wanted to create a definition for the Definition subpage, but could not think of one that was consistent with the current lead-in section. So I thought, why not change the lead-in? This is what I came up with: | David, I wanted to create a definition for the Definition subpage, but could not think of one that was consistent with the current lead-in section. So I thought, why not change the lead-in? This is what I came up with: | ||
:The '''ideal gas law ''' applies to hypothetical gases consisting of atoms or molecules with no intermolecular forces that are in constant random motion undergoing perfectly elastic collisions with the gas container walls and each other. | :"The '''ideal gas law ''' applies to hypothetical gases consisting of atoms or molecules with no intermolecular forces that are in constant random motion undergoing perfectly elastic collisions with the gas container walls and each other. | ||
:The ideal gas law is useful for calculating temperatures, volumes, pressures or number of moles ..... (and the rest of the current lead-in section). | :The ideal gas law is useful for calculating temperatures, volumes, pressures or number of moles ..... (and the rest of the current lead-in section)." | ||
The definition for the Definition subpage could then be: "A gas law that applies to hypothetical gases consisting of atoms or molecules with no intermolecular forces that are in constant random motion undergoing perfectly elastic collisions with the gas container walls and each other." | |||
that applies to hypothetical gases consisting of atoms or molecules with no intermolecular forces that are in constant random motion undergoing perfectly elastic collisions with the gas container walls and each other. | |||
What do you think? [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 11:50, 16 May 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:54, 16 May 2008
Some comments
- IUPAC prescribes lowercase p for pressure.
- Is it necessary to give all forms? In other words can't we expect the reader to know some elementary algebra? (When I went to highschool it was first grade material, student's age around 12 years)
- Molar gas constant R in SI units: 8.314 472 J mol−1K−1 see: http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?r%7Csearch_for=R Don't you also want to give: R = NA kB ?
- The word "constant" in roman: \mathrm{constant}. Same for mol, K, and atm.
- The name of the law varies. I learned in school "law of Boyle and Gay-Lussac".
- You give these worked-out problems, that is OK for a textbook, but for an encyclopedia?
Hope these comments are useful. --Paul Wormer 05:19, 4 October 2007 (CDT)
ideal gas and ideal gas law
Maybe we should merge the two into one article? ideal gas doesn't exist yet, so no real merging is necessary. What do you think? Yuval Langer 06:46, 4 October 2007 (CDT)
Gas laws developed in 1660s
We need to change this back, because only 1 law was started in 1660s. The rest were developed later. David E. Volk 02:14, 2 November 2007 (CDT)
readability
This article needs lots of work on explanations, particularly on what the formulas mean what why they're used, and more elaboration on some concepts. I think it needs some narrative work. --Robert W King 14:58, 8 January 2008 (CST)
Please explain
David Volk: Would you please explain why this equation (at fixed temperature and pressure) has a period in it? Also please explain Vm . - Milton Beychok 12:52, 4 February 2008 (CST)
Special cases
For the various special-cases, rather than writing "= constant" or giving the constant a name such as , how about using the proportional-to symbol? IE:
- Amonton's law: (constant V, n)
- Boyle's law: (constant T, n)
- (constant V, T)
- Charles's law: (constant p, n)
- Avagadro's law: (constant p, T)
Downside: people might not know the meaning of the "" symbol. How about in English for the benefit of the notationally phobic?
Amonton's law: | pressure | is proportional to | temperature | (constant quantity and volume). |
Boyle's law: | pressure | is inversely proportional to | volume | (constant quantity and temperature). |
Warren Schudy 20:23, 5 February 2008 (CST)
Explaining edits made to Intro section.
The wording was re-arranged and reformatted so that the discussion of real gas deviation from ideal gas behavior is now in a separate paragraph.
Revised the wording "... one of the real gas equations, such as the van der Waals equation must be used" to state that there are many equations of state (EOS) that can be used for real gases, of which the van der Waals equation is the simplest. The words "must be used" made it sound as if the use of the van der Waals equation was somehow mandatory.
The ideal gas equation parameters were changed to bold font to make them more obvious. The words "absolute temperature in degrees Kelvin" were changed to "absolute temperature" because the equation applies for other absolute temperature scales as well ... such as degrees Rankine that is still used by many USA engineers. The word "pressure" was changed to "absolute pressure" because the ideal gas equation requires absolute pressure (as differentiated from gauge pressure).
Added a reference to document the quoted numerical value of R. Also added a table of various values of R in other units (using the same table as in the molar gas constant article, for consistency).
To the best of my knowledge, I did not significantly change any of the content ... just made it more readable (I hope) and a wee bit more correct. - Milton Beychok 00:43, 6 May 2008 (CDT)
Nice changes Milton
Milton, thanks for the changes. I still don't what to do with the "Special cases" subsection. I have repeatedly considered deleting the whole thing, writing it out in paragraph form rather than equation form, or rewriting the equations as suggested above with the proportional symbol. Any thoughts on this section? David E. Volk 10:08, 16 May 2008 (CDT)
- Personally, I would delete that entire section as you have previously considered. It really doesn't add anything substantive to the article. Regards, Milton Beychok 10:45, 16 May 2008 (CDT)
- How about moving it to an /Advanced subpage? J. Noel Chiappa 11:53, 16 May 2008 (CDT)
David, how about this?
David, I wanted to create a definition for the Definition subpage, but could not think of one that was consistent with the current lead-in section. So I thought, why not change the lead-in? This is what I came up with:
- "The ideal gas law applies to hypothetical gases consisting of atoms or molecules with no intermolecular forces that are in constant random motion undergoing perfectly elastic collisions with the gas container walls and each other.
- The ideal gas law is useful for calculating temperatures, volumes, pressures or number of moles ..... (and the rest of the current lead-in section)."
The definition for the Definition subpage could then be: "A gas law that applies to hypothetical gases consisting of atoms or molecules with no intermolecular forces that are in constant random motion undergoing perfectly elastic collisions with the gas container walls and each other."
What do you think? Milton Beychok 11:50, 16 May 2008 (CDT)