User talk:Dmitrii Kouznetsov/Analytic Tetration: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov
Line 11: Line 11:
'''Then''' <math>~F~</math> is the [[gamma function]].
'''Then''' <math>~F~</math> is the [[gamma function]].


'''Proof''' see in Reinhold Remmert, "Funktionnentheorie", Springer, 1995. As reference is given: H. Wielandt 1939. (Mein Gott, so old reference!)
'''Proof''', see in Reinhold Remmert, "Funktionnentheorie", Springer, 1995. As reference is given: H. Wielandt 1939. (Mein Gott, so old reference!)


Consider function <math>~v=F-\Gamma~</math> on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation <math>~v(z+1)~=~z~v(z)~</math>
Consider function  
Hence, <math>~v~</math> has a [[meromorphic]] continuation to <math>~\mathbb{C}~</math>;
<math>~v=F-\Gamma~</math> on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation  
<math>~v(z+1)~=~z~v(z)~</math>
Hence,  
<math>~v~</math> has a [[meromorphic]] continuation to  
<math>~\mathbb{C}~</math>;
and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument.
and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument.


Line 20: Line 24:
<math>~\lim_{z\rightarrow 0} z~v(z)=0~</math>,
<math>~\lim_{z\rightarrow 0} z~v(z)=0~</math>,
hence, <math>~v~</math> has a holomorphic continuation to 0 and also to each
hence, <math>~v~</math> has a holomorphic continuation to 0 and also to each
<math>~-n~</math>, <math>~n\in \mathbb{N} </math> by  
<math>~-n~</math>,  
<math>~n\in \mathbb{N} </math> by  
<math>~v(z+1)=z~v(z)~</math>.
<math>~v(z+1)=z~v(z)~</math>.


In the range <math>~ 1\le \Re(z) <2 ~</math>, <math>~v(z)~<math> is pounded. It is because function <math>~ \Gamma ~</math> is bounded there.  
In the range  
<math>~ 1\le \Re(z) <2 ~</math>,  
<math>~v(z)~                   </math> is pounded. It is because function  
<math>~ \Gamma ~       </math> is bounded there.  


Then <math>~v(z)~</math> is also restricted on <math>~\mathbb{S}~</math>,
Then <math>~v(z)~</math> is also restricted on <math>~\mathbb{S}~</math>,

Revision as of 05:57, 29 September 2008

Henryk Trappmann 's theorems

This is approach to the Second part of the Theorem 0, which is still absent in the main text.

Copypast from http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/showthread.php?tid=165&pid=2458#pid2458

Theorem T1. (about Gamma function)

Let be holomorphic on the right half plane let for all such that .
Let .
Let be bounded on the strip .
Then is the gamma function.

Proof, see in Reinhold Remmert, "Funktionnentheorie", Springer, 1995. As reference is given: H. Wielandt 1939. (Mein Gott, so old reference!)

Consider function on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation Hence, has a meromorphic continuation to ; and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument.

While , we have , hence, has a holomorphic continuation to 0 and also to each , by .

In the range , is pounded. It is because function is bounded there.

Then is also restricted on , because and have the same values on . Now , hence is bounded on whole , and by the Liouville Theorem, . Hence, and .

(end of proof)

Theorem T2 (about exponential)

Let be solution of , , bounded in the strip .

Then is exponential on base , id est, .

Proof. We know that every other solution must be of the form where is a 1-periodic holomorphic function. This can roughly be seen by showing periodicity of .

,

where is also a 1-periodic function,

While each of and is bounded on , must be bounded too.

Theorem T3 (about Fibbonachi)

Let .
Let Let Let

Then

Discussion. Id est, is Fibbonachi function.

Theorem T4 (about tetration)

Let .
Let each of and satisfies conditions

for
is holomorphic function, bounded in the strip .

Then

Discussion. Such is unique tetration on the base .