User talk:Dmitrii Kouznetsov/Analytic Tetration: Difference between revisions
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov |
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
'''Then''' <math>~F~</math> is the [[gamma function]]. | '''Then''' <math>~F~</math> is the [[gamma function]]. | ||
'''Proof''' see in Reinhold Remmert, "Funktionnentheorie", Springer, 1995. As reference is given: H. Wielandt 1939. (Mein Gott, so old reference!) | '''Proof''', see in Reinhold Remmert, "Funktionnentheorie", Springer, 1995. As reference is given: H. Wielandt 1939. (Mein Gott, so old reference!) | ||
Consider function <math>~v=F-\Gamma~</math> on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation <math>~v(z+1)~=~z~v(z)~</math> | Consider function | ||
Hence, <math>~v~</math> has a [[meromorphic]] continuation to <math>~\mathbb{C}~</math>; | <math>~v=F-\Gamma~</math> on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation | ||
<math>~v(z+1)~=~z~v(z)~</math> | |||
Hence, | |||
<math>~v~</math> has a [[meromorphic]] continuation to | |||
<math>~\mathbb{C}~</math>; | |||
and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument. | and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument. | ||
Line 20: | Line 24: | ||
<math>~\lim_{z\rightarrow 0} z~v(z)=0~</math>, | <math>~\lim_{z\rightarrow 0} z~v(z)=0~</math>, | ||
hence, <math>~v~</math> has a holomorphic continuation to 0 and also to each | hence, <math>~v~</math> has a holomorphic continuation to 0 and also to each | ||
<math>~-n~</math>, <math>~n\in \mathbb{N} </math> by | <math>~-n~</math>, | ||
<math>~n\in \mathbb{N} </math> by | |||
<math>~v(z+1)=z~v(z)~</math>. | <math>~v(z+1)=z~v(z)~</math>. | ||
In the range <math>~ 1\le \Re(z) <2 ~</math>, <math>~v(z)~<math> is pounded. It is because function <math>~ \Gamma ~</math> is bounded there. | In the range | ||
<math>~ 1\le \Re(z) <2 ~</math>, | |||
<math>~v(z)~ </math> is pounded. It is because function | |||
<math>~ \Gamma ~ </math> is bounded there. | |||
Then <math>~v(z)~</math> is also restricted on <math>~\mathbb{S}~</math>, | Then <math>~v(z)~</math> is also restricted on <math>~\mathbb{S}~</math>, |
Revision as of 05:57, 29 September 2008
Henryk Trappmann 's theorems
This is approach to the Second part of the Theorem 0, which is still absent in the main text.
Copypast from http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/showthread.php?tid=165&pid=2458#pid2458
Theorem T1. (about Gamma function)
Let be holomorphic on the right half plane
let for all such that .
Let .
Let be bounded on the strip .
Then is the gamma function.
Proof, see in Reinhold Remmert, "Funktionnentheorie", Springer, 1995. As reference is given: H. Wielandt 1939. (Mein Gott, so old reference!)
Consider function on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation Hence, has a meromorphic continuation to ; and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument.
While , we have , hence, has a holomorphic continuation to 0 and also to each , by .
In the range , is pounded. It is because function is bounded there.
Then is also restricted on , because and have the same values on . Now , hence is bounded on whole , and by the Liouville Theorem, . Hence, and .
(end of proof)
Theorem T2 (about exponential)
Let be solution of , , bounded in the strip .
Then is exponential on base , id est, .
Proof. We know that every other solution must be of the form where is a 1-periodic holomorphic function. This can roughly be seen by showing periodicity of .
,
where is also a 1-periodic function,
While each of and is bounded on , must be bounded too.
Theorem T3 (about Fibbonachi)
Let .
Let
Let
Let
Then
Discussion. Id est, is Fibbonachi function.
Theorem T4 (about tetration)
Let .
Let each of and satisfies conditions
- for
- is holomorphic function, bounded in the strip .
Then
Discussion. Such is unique tetration on the base .