imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov |
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov |
Line 103: |
Line 103: |
|
| |
|
| (1) '''Let''' <math>~f~</math> be [[holomorphic function]] | | (1) '''Let''' <math>~f~</math> be [[holomorphic function]] |
| on <math>~\mathbb{C}^{\prime}=\mathbb{C}\backslash (-\infty,-2]</math>, | | on <math>~\mathbb{C}^{\prime}=\mathbb{C}\backslash (-\infty,-2]~</math>, |
| such that | | such that |
|
| |
|
| (2) <math> f(0)=1</math> | | (2) <math> f(0)=1</math> |
|
| |
|
| (3) <math>~\exp_b(f(z))=f(z+1)~</math> for <math>\Re(z)>-2</math> | | (3) <math>~\exp_b(f(z))=f(z+1)~</math> for <math>\Re(z)>-2~</math> |
|
| |
|
| (4) <math>~f~</math> is bounded on | | (4) <math>~f~</math> is bounded on |
| <math>~\mathbb{S}=~\{x+\mathrm{i} y|-2<x\le 1, y\in \mathbb{R} \}</math> | | <math>~\mathbb{S}=~\{x+\mathrm{i} y|-2<x\le 1, y\in \mathbb{R} \}~</math> |
|
| |
|
| '''Let''' <math> \mathbb{D} = \{ ~\{x+\mathrm{i} y|-2<x, y\in \mathbb{R} \}</math> | | '''Let''' <math>~ \mathbb{D} = ~\{x+\mathrm{i} y|-2<x, y\in \mathbb{R} \}~</math> |
| | |
| | '''Then''' <math>~ f( \mathbb{D} ) = \mathbb{C} ~ </math> |
|
| |
|
| '''Then''' <math>f( \mathbb{D} ) = \mathbb{C} ~ </math>
| |
| =====Proof of Lemma 1===== | | =====Proof of Lemma 1===== |
|
| |
|
Henryk Trappmann 's theorems
This is approach to the Second part of the Theorem 0, which is still absent in the main text.
Copypast from http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/showthread.php?tid=165&pid=2458#pid2458
Theorem T1. (about Gamma function)
Let be holomorphic on the right half plane
let for all such that .
Let .
Let be bounded on the strip .
Then is the gamma function.
Proof, see in Reinhold Remmert, "Funktionnentheorie", Springer, 1995. As reference is given: H. Wielandt 1939. (Mein Gott, so old reference!)
Consider function
on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation
Hence,
has a meromorphic continuation to
;
and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument.
While , we have
,
hence, has a holomorphic continuation to 0 and also to each
,
by
.
In the range
,
is pounded. It is because function
is bounded there.
Then is also restricted on ,
because and have the same values on
. Now , hence is bounded on whole , and by the
Liouville Theorem, . Hence,
and .
(end of proof)
Theorem T2 (about exponential)
Let be solution of
,
, bounded in the strip
.
Then is exponential on base , id est,
.
Proof.
We know that every other solution must be of the form
where is a 1-periodic holomorphic function.
This can roughly be seen by showing periodicity of
.
,
where is also a 1-periodic function,
While each of and is bounded on
,
must be bounded too.
Theorem T3 (about Fibbonachi)
Let .
Let
Let
Let
Then
Discussion. Id est, is Fibbonachi function.
Theorem T4 (about tetration)
First intent to formulate
Let .
Let each of and satisfies conditions
- for
- is holomorphic function, bounded in the strip .
Then
Second intent to formulate
(0) Let .
(1) Let each of and is holomorphic function
on ,
satisfying conditions
(2)
(3) for
(4) is bounded on
Then
Proof of Theorem T4
Lemma 1
(0) Let .
(1) Let be holomorphic function
on ,
such that
(2)
(3) for
(4) is bounded on
Let
Then
Proof of Lemma 1
Proof of theorem T4
Discussion
Such is unique tetration on the base .