User talk:Dmitrii Kouznetsov/Analytic Tetration: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov
Line 14: Line 14:


Consider function <math>~v=F-\Gamma~</math> on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation <math>~v(z+1)~=~z~v(z)~</math>
Consider function <math>~v=F-\Gamma~</math> on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation <math>~v(z+1)~=~z~v(z)~</math>
Hence, <math>~v~has a [[meromorphic]] continuation to <math>~\mathbb{C}~</math>;
Hence, <math>~v~</math> has a [[meromorphic]] continuation to <math>~\mathbb{C}~</math>;
and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument.
and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument.


Line 22: Line 22:
<math>~-n~</math>, <math>~n\in \mathbb{N} </math> by  
<math>~-n~</math>, <math>~n\in \mathbb{N} </math> by  
<math>~v(z+1)=z~v(z)~</math>.
<math>~v(z+1)=z~v(z)~</math>.
In the range <math>~ 1\le \Re(z) <2 ~</math>, <math>~v(z)~<math> is pounded. It is because function <math>~ \Gamma ~</math> is bounded there.
Then <math>~v(z)~</math> is also restricted on <math>~\mathbb{S}~</math>,
because <math>~v(z)!</math> and <math>~v(1-z)!</math> have the same values on
<math>~\mathbb{S}~</math>.  Now <math>~q(z+1)=-q(z)~</math>, hence <math>~q~</math> is bounded on whole <math>~\mathbb{C}~</math>, and by the
[[Liouville Theorem]], <math>~q(z)=q(1)=0</math>. Hence, <math>~v=0~</math>
and <math>~F=\Gamma~</math>.
(end of proof)


===Theorem T2 (about exponential)===
===Theorem T2 (about exponential)===

Revision as of 05:54, 29 September 2008

Henryk Trappmann 's theorems

This is approach to the Second part of the Theorem 0, which is still absent in the main text.

Copypast from http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/showthread.php?tid=165&pid=2458#pid2458

Theorem T1. (about Gamma function)

Let be holomorphic on the right half plane let for all such that .
Let .
Let be bounded on the strip .
Then is the gamma function.

Proof see in Reinhold Remmert, "Funktionnentheorie", Springer, 1995. As reference is given: H. Wielandt 1939. (Mein Gott, so old reference!)

Consider function on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation Hence, has a meromorphic continuation to ; and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument.

While , we have , hence, has a holomorphic continuation to 0 and also to each , by .

In the range , is bounded there.

Then is also restricted on , because and have the same values on . Now , hence is bounded on whole , and by the Liouville Theorem, . Hence, and .

(end of proof)

Theorem T2 (about exponential)

Let be solution of , , bounded in the strip .

Then is exponential on base , id est, .

Proof. We know that every other solution must be of the form where is a 1-periodic holomorphic function. This can roughly be seen by showing periodicity of .

,

where is also a 1-periodic function,

While each of and is bounded on , must be bounded too.

Theorem T3 (about Fibbonachi)

Let .
Let Let Let

Then

Discussion. Id est, is Fibbonachi function.

Theorem T4 (about tetration)

Let .
Let each of and satisfies conditions

for
is holomorphic function, bounded in the strip .

Then

Discussion. Such is unique tetration on the base .