Talk:Key (cryptography): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sandy Harris (question) |
imported>Sandy Harris No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Should that text go in [[Cryptography]]? Or here? Or where? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 03:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | Should that text go in [[Cryptography]]? Or here? Or where? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 03:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
: I added it at [[Cryptography#Principles_and_terms]]. That seemed the right place, since it is a general principle. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 09:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:45, 5 February 2010
I think we need something somewhere that discusses the general notion that systems which require something large, rather than just a small key, to be kept secret are a bad idea. This applies to one-time pads and to codes needing a codebook, and is one way to think about Kerckhoffs'_Principle; there may be applications I have not thought of.
Should that text go in Cryptography? Or here? Or where? Sandy Harris 03:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- I added it at Cryptography#Principles_and_terms. That seemed the right place, since it is a general principle. Sandy Harris 09:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Mathematics Category Check
- Computers Category Check
- Military Category Check
- Stub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Mathematics Stub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Computers Stub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Military Stub Articles
- Military Internal Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles
- Military Underlinked Articles
- Military tag