Talk:Key (cryptography): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Sandy Harris
(question)
imported>Sandy Harris
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


Should that text go in [[Cryptography]]? Or here? Or where? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 03:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Should that text go in [[Cryptography]]? Or here? Or where? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 03:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
: I added it at [[Cryptography#Principles_and_terms]]. That seemed the right place, since it is a general principle. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 09:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:45, 5 February 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Characteristics and generation of data which, in combination with a cryptographic algorithm, introduces or removes the concealment applied to plaintext or taken to ciphertext; key management is arelated but separate discipline of secure distribution of keys and entering them into cryptosystems [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Mathematics, Computers and Military [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

I think we need something somewhere that discusses the general notion that systems which require something large, rather than just a small key, to be kept secret are a bad idea. This applies to one-time pads and to codes needing a codebook, and is one way to think about Kerckhoffs'_Principle; there may be applications I have not thought of.

Should that text go in Cryptography? Or here? Or where? Sandy Harris 03:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

I added it at Cryptography#Principles_and_terms. That seemed the right place, since it is a general principle. Sandy Harris 09:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)