Template talk:Credit: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day (never mind you templates were done way before that) |
imported>Stephen Ewen (Run with it.) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:So are you done with the {{tl|Image}} template? If so I would like to use that one, rather the current version {{tl|Image2}}. ''Image'' is more intuitive. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 17:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC) | :So are you done with the {{tl|Image}} template? If so I would like to use that one, rather the current version {{tl|Image2}}. ''Image'' is more intuitive. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 17:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Run with it. :-) [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 10:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:07, 8 November 2008
So am I correct that the only difference between this and the system I created is that this transposes the ifexist perimeter whereas mine did not but included the verbaige each time? If so, this is superior. I was still learnin'.
Keep in mind CZ:Media_Credit_Lines_within_Articles and the differences of PD, CC, GFL, etc. :-) Stephen Ewen 16:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Me too, I have a vague recollection of you asking me how to do that and I did not notice the subsequent knock on effect. You are correct that with respect to the final code, there is no difference, it just gets hidden within a template, transpose if you will.
- I did note all the different version of the credit template. That should not be an issue as the {{credit}} template I just created is reading the content from the pictures (or diagrams) credit template. Consequently it is passive with respect to with actual credit version is used when uploading the photo.
- So are you done with the {{Image}} template? If so I would like to use that one, rather the current version {{}}. Image is more intuitive. Chris Day 17:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Run with it. :-) Stephen Ewen 10:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)