Talk:Trousers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones (Please Remove) |
imported>Aleta Curry (→Comments: and that's no joke....) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
This article was started to prove a point and is a gag. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 22:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC) | This article was started to prove a point and is a gag. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 22:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I disagree with the request for removal. I appreciate that it may have begun as a joke, but trousers are an important article of clothing and have cultural ('who wears the pants?' Graduating from short to long pants as a rite of passage), political (les sans culottes, 'bloomer girls') and religious (gender-specific clothing) significance. | |||
:Rather than removing, we should be expanding. Anyone want to join me/prod me into giving it a go? | |||
:[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 09:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:23, 14 December 2011
Cannot resist Ogden Nash
Ay, deck your lower limbs in pants; Yours are the limbs, my sweeting. You look divine as you advance - Have you seen yourself retreating?
Howard C. Berkowitz 22:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Removal
Removal suggested by Russell D. Jones 22:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Editorial Council: Case 2011-xxx
- Opened:
- Closed:
Comments
This article was started to prove a point and is a gag. Russell D. Jones 22:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree with the request for removal. I appreciate that it may have begun as a joke, but trousers are an important article of clothing and have cultural ('who wears the pants?' Graduating from short to long pants as a rite of passage), political (les sans culottes, 'bloomer girls') and religious (gender-specific clothing) significance.
- Rather than removing, we should be expanding. Anyone want to join me/prod me into giving it a go?
- Aleta Curry 09:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)