CZ:Charter/Things to address: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick
No edit summary
imported>Russell D. Jones
(Checks and balances)
Line 5: Line 5:
#dispute resolution concerning content, behaviour or technical matters  
#dispute resolution concerning content, behaviour or technical matters  
#The judicial process
#The judicial process
#Who gets to decide about editorship?
#Who gets to decide about editorship? Ed council
#Who gets to decide about technical features, e.g. new subpage types?
#Who gets to decide about technical features, e.g. new subpage types? Ed Council
#Quorum. What would be a sufficient mimimum number of members to be termed a 'quorum' on Citizendium?
#Quorum. What would be a sufficient mimimum number of members to be termed a 'quorum' on Citizendium?
#Rights and responsibilities of each role (authors, editors, E-i-C, constables, etc.)
#Rights and responsibilities of each role (authors, editors, <s>E-i-C</s>, constables, etc.)
#Checks and Balances on the powers of the Constabulary and Ed Council.

Revision as of 09:45, 16 October 2009

Starting this page to place some of the things that we can address, or at least provide a way to address these things, in the charter. This may include things that should be institutionalized but not directly in the charter, which are collected at CZ:Charter drafting/Things to address but not in charter.

  1. dispute resolution concerning content, behaviour or technical matters
  2. The judicial process
  3. Who gets to decide about editorship? Ed council
  4. Who gets to decide about technical features, e.g. new subpage types? Ed Council
  5. Quorum. What would be a sufficient mimimum number of members to be termed a 'quorum' on Citizendium?
  6. Rights and responsibilities of each role (authors, editors, E-i-C, constables, etc.)
  7. Checks and Balances on the powers of the Constabulary and Ed Council.