Fast breeder reactor: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(Interim pipe to plutonium reprocessing, which needs its own article)
Line 4: Line 4:
  | date = 17 July 2006  journal = Scientific American
  | date = 17 July 2006  journal = Scientific American
  | title = How do fast breeder reactors differ from regular nuclear power plants?
  | title = How do fast breeder reactors differ from regular nuclear power plants?
  | author = P. Andrew Karam }}</ref>  The reactor product is not immediately usable as fuel, but requires complex and hazardous reprocessing.
  | author = P. Andrew Karam }}</ref>  The reactor product is not immediately usable as fuel, but requires complex and hazardous [[nuclear fuel cycle# fuel|reprocessing]].


There has been hesitancy to use this design, over concerns on weapons-grade plutonium becoming too widely available.  Only two, neither of which is operational, has been built in the U.S.
There has been hesitancy to use this design, over concerns on weapons-grade plutonium becoming too widely available.  Only two, neither of which is operational, have been built in the U.S.
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 06:53, 7 May 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

A fast breeder reactor is a nuclear power reactor in whose design tradeoffs have been made not to produce the ideal heat for power generation, but to produce reasonable heat but also a substantial amount of high-energy neutrons that will make ("breed") potential nuclear fuel of an appropriate plutonium isotope. Economically, it seems attractive when a reactor can produce 30 percent more fuel than it burns.[1] The reactor product is not immediately usable as fuel, but requires complex and hazardous reprocessing.

There has been hesitancy to use this design, over concerns on weapons-grade plutonium becoming too widely available. Only two, neither of which is operational, have been built in the U.S.

References

  1. P. Andrew Karam (17 July 2006 journal = Scientific American), How do fast breeder reactors differ from regular nuclear power plants?