Talk:Mark 4 (nuclear weapon): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
(reason not to PropDel this for now)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== reason to delay PropDel ==
The mention of the accident is not on the Wikipedia article [[Wikipedia:Mark 4 nuclear weapon]], but IS is a separate (unlinked) WP article [[Wikipedia:List of military nuclear accidents]].  I want to look into this matter more.  It is shocking to note that the accident does not exist on the Wikipedia page about this weapon. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 11:25, 18 March 2024 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:25, 18 March 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Still first-generation but a production-quality, re-engineered version of the Fat Man bomb, the yield of which could be varied from 1, 3.5, 8, 14, 21, 22, and 31 kt TNT equivalent by exchanging the plutonium pits; first weapon made on an assembly line rather than by hand; design ancestor of the British Blue Danube bomb [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Military and History [Please add or review categories]
 Subgroup category:  Nuclear Engineering
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

reason to delay PropDel

The mention of the accident is not on the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Mark 4 nuclear weapon, but IS is a separate (unlinked) WP article Wikipedia:List of military nuclear accidents. I want to look into this matter more. It is shocking to note that the accident does not exist on the Wikipedia page about this weapon. Pat Palmer (talk) 11:25, 18 March 2024 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Mark_4_(nuclear_weapon)&oldid=941713"