Bismarck-class: Difference between revisions
John Leach (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Voyages for Atlantic raids could be relatively short, so habitability was not as much an issue. Given that habitability could be sacrificed, the designers made the ships extremely rugged in terms of watertight compartmentation, although they made some crucial errors in not protecting various control cables. They had four turrets with dual 15" guns, smaller than those of the most recent enemy ships but more than adequate for the older battleships assigned as convoy escorts. These ships also had exceptionally large 6" and 5" secondary batteries that could sink merchant ships and provide antiaircraft fire, although there was poor antiaircraft fire detection. | Voyages for Atlantic raids could be relatively short, so habitability was not as much an issue. Given that habitability could be sacrificed, the designers made the ships extremely rugged in terms of watertight compartmentation, although they made some crucial errors in not protecting various control cables. They had four turrets with dual 15" guns, smaller than those of the most recent enemy ships but more than adequate for the older battleships assigned as convoy escorts. These ships also had exceptionally large 6" and 5" secondary batteries that could sink merchant ships and provide antiaircraft fire, although there was poor antiaircraft fire detection. | ||
''[[KMS Bismarck]]'' sortied once, sank the large [[battlecruiser]] ''[[HMS Hood]]'', and took much of the British Home Fleet -- and considerable luck -- to chase and sink. ''[[KMS Tirpitz]]'' never actually went into combat, but, homeported in Norway, was a constant threat in being to the convoys to Russia. | ''[[KMS Bismarck]]'' sortied once, sank the large [[battlecruiser]] ''[[HMS Hood]]'', and took much of the British Home Fleet -- and considerable luck -- to chase and sink. ''[[KMS Tirpitz]]'' never actually went into combat, but, homeported in Norway, was a constant threat in being to the convoys to Russia.[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:00, 19 July 2024
The only modern battleships built by Nazi Germany were the two ships of the Bismarck-class, the second being KMS Tirpitz. These were optimized differently than Japanese, U.K., or U.S. battleships that needed long cruising range and reasonable crew habitability for long voyages; their principal mission was commerce raiding in the Atlantic.
Voyages for Atlantic raids could be relatively short, so habitability was not as much an issue. Given that habitability could be sacrificed, the designers made the ships extremely rugged in terms of watertight compartmentation, although they made some crucial errors in not protecting various control cables. They had four turrets with dual 15" guns, smaller than those of the most recent enemy ships but more than adequate for the older battleships assigned as convoy escorts. These ships also had exceptionally large 6" and 5" secondary batteries that could sink merchant ships and provide antiaircraft fire, although there was poor antiaircraft fire detection.
KMS Bismarck sortied once, sank the large battlecruiser HMS Hood, and took much of the British Home Fleet -- and considerable luck -- to chase and sink. KMS Tirpitz never actually went into combat, but, homeported in Norway, was a constant threat in being to the convoys to Russia.