Talk:Fair use
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The definition is radically problematic. It does not provide for the right to copy by posting on the web or publishing, it provides a right for a defense for certain types of incorporations of copyrighted works into other publications without permission. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 22:29, 26 September 2007 (CDT)
- That Japan has "similar national laws" regarding fair use is simply wrong. The Japanese legal system has no correlate to the four prongs. Rather than creating principles that courts then interpret on a case-by-case basis, they instead have opted to create amazingly detailed laws on what is and is not recognized as Limitations on Copyright in Japan. In the same manner as other countries, however, their courts are frequently called upon to decide cases based upon that complex of limitations. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 22:51, 26 September 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Law Developing Articles
- Law Nonstub Articles
- Law Internal Articles
- Library and Information Science Developing Articles
- Library and Information Science Nonstub Articles
- Library and Information Science Internal Articles
- Law Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Library and Information Science Underlinked Articles