Fetal programming
How we are ushered into life determines how we leave. |
'Fetal programming' refers to responses a fetus makes to its intrauterine environment, responses affecting its structural, metabolic and physiological characteristics, hence those of its newborn body. A fetus's intrauterine environment helps program its growth and development. When exposed to a suboptimal intrauterine environment, the fetuse grows and develops abnormally, resulting in a newborn infant with abnormal structural, metabolic and physiological characteristics that can increase its susceptibility to disease in later life.[3] [Note 1]
The major, but not exclusive, environmental influences on the type and degree of fetal programming derive from the fetus's maternal connection via the placenta, hence from the health status of the mother, both physical and mental.
In a 2004 review, pioneer of fetal programming phenomena, David Barker, summarized the following as 'key teaching points':[4]
|
In 2011, University of Columbia reseearchers, Zeltser and Leibel, emphasizing the role of the placenta, note:[5]
Following on the seminal observations of Barker and associates ([cites:[6]]), maternal hormonal and nutrient environment has been systematically implicated in effects on the developing fetus that ultimately influence susceptibility to a wide range of metabolic, neurodevelopmental, and psychiatric diseases in adulthood ([cites:[7] [8]]). There is a growing appreciation that perturbations in the maternal environment are conveyed to the fetus by changes in placental function ([cites:[9]]).[5] |
In a more recent review, psychoneuroendocrinologist Sonja Entringer describes fetal programming this way:
Substantial evidence in humans and animals suggests that conditions during intrauterine life play a major role in shaping not only all aspects of fetal development and birth outcomes but also subsequent newborn, child, and adult health outcomes and susceptibility for many of the complex, common disorders that confer the major burden of disease in society (i.e., the concept of fetal, or developmental, origins of health and disease risk) [cites: [10] [11]].[12] |
Focusing on pathophysiology, fetal programming also goes by the name, 'fetal origins of adult disease'. From a broader perspective than the pathophysiological, however, the fetus also responds to beneficial intrauterine environments, adapting its metabolism, physiology, and structure to health and lower susceptibility to disease in later life. For one example, in the studies of Barker mentioned above, the babies born with higher birth-weight due to more optimal maternal nutrition had significantly lower risk of developing coronary heart disease than did the lower birth-weight babies.[4]
Recognition of fetal programming led to recognition that the earliest stages of development, including infancy, could respond to environmental conditions in ways that influenced health status in later life, which, in turn, led to a new discipline, The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease.[13] [Note 3] [4]
Postnatal disease types sensitive to fetal programmingMetabolic diseasesNeurodevelopmental diseasesPsychiatric diseasesAdverse types of fetal environmental conditions promoting fetal programmingMaternal nutritional abnormalitiesMaternal psychosocial stressPaternal genetic abnormalitiesMaternal hormonal abnormalitiesExamples of fetal programming in humansIn 1986, David Barker and Clive Osmond reported on their studies of the relationships among infant mortality, childhood nutrition, and adult ischemic heart disease in England and Wales. By geographical regions, past infant mortality rates, highest where poverty was greatest, associated positively with present occurrences of ischemic heart disease, whereas increasing heart disease presently associated with increasing prosperity. From their analysis the investigators suggested that “poor nutrition in early life increases susceptibility to the effects of an affluent diet”.[14] Fetal programming applies also to age-related cognitive decline. A long term follow-up study in men by Katri Raikkonen and colleagues showed that lower cognitive ability at mean age 67.9 years associated with lower birth-weight, birth-length, and birth-head-circumference.[15] Similarly, cognitive decline after age 20 years associated with those lower measures of intrauterine physical growth. The investigator found that in "predicting resilience to age related cognitive decline, the period before birth seems to be more critical" compared to the period of infancy. Examples of fetal programming in non-human animalsIn sheep, suboptimal maternal nutrition coincident with early fetal kidney development results in enhanced renal lipid deposition following juvenile obesity and could accelerate the onset of the adverse metabolic, rather than cardiovascular, symptoms accompanying the metabolic syndrome.[16] Fetal programming response to maternal stress
Reverse fetal programming: fetal programming of motherHolding ref: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120606155802.htm References cited in text
Notes
|