Creolistics

From Citizendium
Revision as of 06:45, 26 September 2007 by imported>Subpagination Bot (Add {{subpages}} and remove any categories (details))
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
Linguistics
Phonology
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Theoretical linguistics
Generative linguistics
Cognitive linguistics
Language acquisition
First language acquisition
Second language acquisition
Applied linguistics
Psycholinguistics
Phonetics
Sociolinguistics
Creolistics
Evolutionary linguistics
Linguistic variation
Linguistic typology
Anthropological linguistics
Computational linguistics
Descriptive linguistics
Historical linguistics
Comparative linguistics
History of linguistics
Languagenaturalconstructed
Grammar
Language Acquisition
First language acquisition
Second language acquisition
Critical period hypothesis
Contrastive analysis
Fossilization
Applied linguistics
Monitor theory
Language teaching
Communicative approach
Comprehension approach
Multilingualism
Language attrition
Creolistics

Creolistics is the study of both creole languages and the pidgin languages from which creoles develop. Although the study of these contact languages is most often associated with linguistics, it has expanded into related fields such as anthropology, sociology, history and literary studies, because the creation of a creole invariably involves cross-cultural contact.[1]

Linguists who study creole phenomena may be known as creolists, with their work forming a branch of sociolinguistics, which comprises research on language as used in society.

Creolistics has provided some revealing and controversial insights into language evolution and acquisition. For example, the language bioprogram hypothesis[2] of Derek Bickerton claims that creole genesis supports ideas about the nature of language associated with Noam Chomsky; as creole grammars are remarkably similar across the world,[3] this reflects the existence of an innate faculty for language.


Footnotes

  1. Siegel (2005: 141).
  2. e.g. Bickerton (1984).
  3. Sebba (1997: 70-72).


References

  • Bickerton D (1984) 'The language bioprogram hypothesis.' Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173-222.
  • Sebba M (1997) Contact Languages: Pidgins and Creoles. London: Macmillan. ISBN 0-333-63024-6.
  • Siegel J (2005) ' Creolization outside creolistics.' Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 20 : 141-166.


See also