Horizontal gene transfer/Citable Version

From Citizendium
< Horizontal gene transfer
Revision as of 17:26, 8 January 2007 by imported>David Tribe (→‎Evolutionary theory)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Legionella pneumophila are prokaryotic bacteria that can survive and reproduce inside phagocytic cells such as protists that have eaten them. They occasionally capture genes from the eukaryotic host cells, and are competent in transformation.

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) (also called lateral gene transfer (LGT)) is any process in which an organism transfers genetic material to another cell or organism that is not one of its own offspring. HGT is thus very different from the normal vertical gene transfer whereby parental traits are inherited by the progeny, whether by sexual fusion of gametes to form zygotes as in animals and plants, or by asexual propagation as in microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi. HGT occurs at a lower frequency than vertical gene transfer, so is not easily detected directly, and finding evidence for it requires special techniques.

Introduction

The advances in genome science and bioinformatics have brought abundant indirect evidence that extensive natural HGT has occurred between diverse biological taxa that are widely separated in the phylogenetic tree. About 2% of core microbial genes arise from HGT, and this allows the the main lineages of microbial evolution to be treated as 'trees' with HGT 'cobwebs' (see figures). These transfers include gene movement between different species of microbes and other microbial taxa such as protists, between different plant families, between different animals, and between bacteria and plants.

HGT — gene exchange between non-related organisms —appears commonplace among bacteria, but contributes just small bits of genetic information, leaving the traditional tree of life intact. From: Comparing Gene Trees and Genome Trees: A Cobweb of Life? PLoS Biol 3 e347

Gene transfers between different biological domains, such as between eukaryotic protists and bacteria [1] , or between bacteria and insects [2] are the most phylogenetically extreme cases of HGT. Bacterial "rol" genes from Agrobacterium species have been found in tobacco plants (Nicotiniana). [3].

HGT is closely related to mobile DNA ("jumping genes", transposons) and the dynamic changes that occur during genome evolution caused by the DNA rearrangement and transposition processes catalyzed by mobile DNA. Movement of mobile genes (such as transposons) within a genome, and between different parts of an organism's genome (that is, between the chromosomes of the nucleus, the circular mitochondrion chromosome [4], and the circular plastid (chloroplast) chromosome) are part of the mechanisms that enable HGT between different species.

Main features of HGT in nature

  • A hallmark of HGT is the presence of the same gene in organisms that are only very distantly related. The frequent discovery of shared DNA sequences such as the marinerclass of transposons, insertion sequence DNA, and retrovirus genes in diverse species, and shared mitochondrial genes in diverse flowering plants, indicate that mobile DNA has natural pathways for movement between species. Close relatives of mariner mobile DNA have been discovered in organisms as diverse as mites, flatworms, hydras, insects, nematodes, mammals and humans[5].
Millet. From: Jumping Genes Cross Plant Species Boundaries. Analysis of the genomes of millet and rice revealed evidence for HGT between chromosomes in the nucleus of one plant to chromosomes in the nucleus of a reproductively isolated species
  • Horizontal movement of genes is common among bacteria and is responsible for infectious multiple-antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria, a major factor limiting the effectiveness of antibiotics. Inter-domain transfer of several genes, from eukaryotes to bacteria for instance, as represented by an "accidentally pathogenic" bacterium (Legionella pneumophila, see illustration) that lives and replicates within a vacuole of protist and mammalian macrophage cells, has also been demonstrated [6].
  • HGT is common in diverse groups of unicellular protists, which often contain several genes transferred from both prokaryotes and other protists [7].
  • HGT occurs globally on a massive scale among marine microorganisms, and viruses, at total numbers near 1029 being the most common biological entities in the sea, are a major pathway for inter-species gene movement in the ocean. The estimated virus-mediated gene transfer events in the Mediterranean sea are 1013 per year [8]. Endosymbiosis with an alga is identified as a route for HGT in marine dinoflagellates, the organisms that cause 'red tides' [9].
  • Mechanisms for HGT in flowering plants involving parasitic plants such as dodder or endophytes such as mosses (which facilitate inter-species gene transfer by being in intimate cell-to-cell contact with their host plants) are now well established (see Horizontal gene transfer in plants).
  • Not all of the vehicles by which HGT occurs are fully characterized, but some are clearly identified. HGT is difficult to detect directly, as it occurs at lower frequencies than with normal sexual reproduction within the species. Modern techniques of DNA analysis, by providing detailed comparison of genomes, provide much of the evidence for HGT. In insects, mites and viruses are probable vectors for HGT. In bacteria, surface appendages called pili have various roles in DNA uptake, DNA secretion and DNA transfer which have been extensively analyzed; HGT in bacteria includes plasmid-mediated promiscuous mating by bacteria, for instance by the crown-gall bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens[10], and carriage of genes between species by viruses[11]. Direct DNA uptake as another transfer mechanism is illustrated by Legionella bacteria, which are naturally competent for DNA uptake.

Prokaryotes

See main article HGT in prokaryotes
The three main mechanisms of HGT in bacteria and archaea discussed here are:

Eukaryotes

Protists

Analysis of the complete genome sequence of the protist Entamoeba histolytica indicates 96 cases of relatively recent HGT from prokaryotes [12], whereas similar analysis of the complete genome sequence of the protist Cryptosporidium parvum reveals 24 candidates of HGT from bacteria [13].There is also convincing evidence that a bacterial gene for a biosynthetic enzyme has been recruited by the protist Trichomonas vaginalis from bacteria related to the ancestors of Pasteurella bacteria.[14] These results fit the idea that "you are what you eat". That is, with unicellular grazing organisms, foreign genetic material is constantly entering the cell and occasionally the genome from food organisms [15]

Fungi

Comparison of the genome sequences of two fungi, baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and Ashbya gossypii, has shown that Saccharomyces has received two genes from bacteria by HGT. One codes for an enzyme that allows baker's yeast to make pyrimidine nucleotide bases anaerobically, and the other allows usage of sulfur from several organic sulfur sources.[16]. Other work with yeasts suggests that eight genes from Yarrowia lipolytica, five from Kluyveromyces lactis, and one from Debaryomyces hansenii are horizontally transferred. [17]

Other eukaryotes

Analysis of DNA sequences suggests that HGT has also occurred within multicellular eukaryotes, by a route that involves transfer of genes from chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes to the nuclear genomes [18]. According to the endosymbiotic theory, chloroplasts and mitochondria originated as the bacterial endosymbionts of a progenitor to the eukaryotic cell.

Plants

See Horizontal gene transfer in plants for
  • Natural gene transfer between plants that do not cross-pollinate
  • Jumping genes cross naturally between rice and millet
  • Epiphytes and parasites as a bridge for gene flow between diverse plant species
See Transgenic plant for hybridization by cross-pollination and artificial horizontal gene transfer in biotechnology.

Plant genes have also been discovered to be able to move to endophyte fungi that grow on them. Several plant endophyte fungi that grow on taxol-producing yew trees have gained the ability to make taxol themselves [19]. (Taxol, also called paclitaxel, is an anti-cancer drug found in yew trees.)

Animals

Junk DNA is the most obvious general evidence of HGT in eukaryotes. Such seemingly non-functional repetitive DNA is a major portion of many genomes of plants and animals. This DNA usually includes multiple copies of various "Jumping genes" which can proliferate within a genome after they have been transferred from another species. Examples in the human of such mobile elements are 'Hsmar1' and 'Hsmar2' which are related to the widely studied 'mariner' transposon. Close relatives of mariner mobile DNA have been discovered in organisms as diverse as mites, flatworms, hydras, insects, nematodes, mammals and humans [20].Retroviruses and retrotransposons are other examples of mobile horizontally transferred DNA found in animals.

The adzuki bean beetle Callosobruchus chinensis is infected with several strains of bacterial Wolbachia endosymbionts. A genome fragment of one of these endosymbionts has been found transferred to the X chromosome of the host insect [21].

History of discovery of HGT

See main article Horizontal gene transfer (History)
  • Bacterial genetics starts in 1946
see main article Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes
  • First glimpses of horizontal transfer of traits in plant evolution
see also main article Barbara McClintock
  • Discovery of mobile genes in flies, and mariner
  • HGT and genetic engineering

Evolutionary theory

The fact that genes can move between distant branches of the tree of life even at low probabilities raises challenges to scientists who are trying to reconstruct evolution from studying genes and gene sequences in different organisms, because HGT effectively scrambles the information on which biologist are relying to reconstruct a phylogeny of organisms - that is their evolutionary history and relationships. Furthermore, the challenges that are raised by HGT are most awkward for the ambitious (but extremely interesting) reconstruction of the earliest events in evolution - that is the early branches of the tree of life, because over long time intervals and with large numbers of organisms many low probability HGT events are certain to have actually occurred.

A Three Domain tree of life showing the separation of bacteria, archaea, and eukaryote domains. See Microorganisms article for further explanation.

The three main early branches of the tree of life have been intensively studied by microbiologists because the first organisms were microorganisms. Microbiologists (led by Carl Woese) have introduced the term domain for the three main branches of this tree, where domain is a phylogenetic term very similar in meaning to biological kingdom. To reconstruct this tree of life, the sequence of a particular genes encoding the small subunit of ribosomal RNA have proven very useful, and the tree shown to the left relies heavily on information from this single gene.

These three domains of life represent the main lineages in evolution of early cellular life and currently represented by the bacteria, the archaea (single celled organisms superficially similar to bacteria), and eukaryote domains.

Eukaryotes are all organisms with a well defined nucleus, and this domain comprises protists, fungi, and all organisms in the animal and plant kingdoms, including humans (See figure at left).

The most common gene used for constructing phylogenetic relationships in microrganisms is the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA, 16s rRNA) gene, as its sequences tend to be conserved among members with close phylogenetic distances, yet it is variable enough that differences can be measured [22]. The SSU rRNA as a measure of evolutionary distances was pioneered by Carl Woese when formulating the first modern "tree of life", and his results led him to propose the Archaea as a third domain of life.) However, recently it has been argued that SSU rRNA genes can also be horizontally transferred. [23] Although this may be rare, this possiblity is forcing scrutiny of the validity of phylogenetic trees based on SSU rRNAs.

Recent discoveries of 'rampant' HGT in microorganisms, and the detection of horizontal movement of even genes for the small subunit of ribosomal RNA have forced biologists to question the accuracy of at least the early branches in the tree shown on the left, and even question the validity of trees as useful models of how early evolution occurs.[24]

"Sequence comparisons suggest recent horizontal transfer of many genes among diverse species including across the boundaries of phylogenetic "domains". Thus determining the phylogenetic history of a species can not be done conclusively by determining evolutionary trees for single genes." [25] HGT is thus a potential confounding factor in inferring phylogenetic trees from the sequence of one gene. For example, if two distantly related bacteria have exchanged a gene, a phylogenetic tree including those species will show them to be closely related even though most other genes have diverged substantially. For this reason it is important to use other information to infer phylogenies, such as the presence or absence of genes, or, more commonly, to include as wide a range of genes for analysis as possible.


Which metaphor: tree, a net or cobweb?

In his article Uprooting the Tree of Life, W. Ford Doolittle discusses the Last Universal Common Ancestor - the root of the Tree of Life - and the problems with that concept posed by HGT[26]. He describes the microorganism Archaeoglobus fulgidus as an anomaly with respect to a phylogenetic tree based upon the code for the enzyme HMGCoA reductase - the organism is definitely an archaean, with all the cell lipids and transcription machinery expected of an archaean, but its HMGCoA genes are of bacterial origin. In the article, Doolittle says that while it is now widely accepted that mitochondria in eukaryotes derived from alpha-proteobacterial cells and that chloroplasts came from ingested cyanobacteria,

".. it is no longer safe to assume that those were the only lateral gene transfers that occurred after the first eukaryotes arose. Only in later, multicellular eukaryotes do we know of definite restrictions on horizontal gene exchange, such as the advent of separated (and protected) germ cells...


If there had never been any lateral gene transfer, all these individual gene trees would have the same topology (the same branching order), and the ancestral genes at the root of each tree would have all been present in the last universal common ancestor, a single ancient cell. But extensive transfer means that neither is the case: gene trees will differ (although many will have regions of similar topology) and there would never have been a single cell that could be called the last universal common ancestor..."

Doolittle suggested that the universal common ancestor cannot have been one particular organism, but must have been a loose, diverse conglomeration of primitive cells that evolved together. These early cells, each with relatively few genes, differed in many ways, and swapped their genes freely. Eventually, from these eclectic cells came the three domains of life as we know them today: bacteria, archaea and eukaryote. These domains are now recognizably distinct because much of the gene transfer that still occurs is within these domains, rather than between them. Biologist Peter Gogarten reinforced these arguments, and suggested that the metaphor of a tree does not fit the data from recent genome research, and that biologists should instead use "the metaphor of a mosaic to describe the different histories combined in individual genomes and use [the] metaphor of a net to visualize the rich exchange and cooperative effects of HGT among microbes." [27]

Resolution of uncertainty with Phylogenomics

Tree Based on the Median Tree Algorithm. [28] Branches with bootstrap (statistical) scores less than 50% were collapsed. The three domains of life are (A) archaea, (B–J) bacteria, and (K) eukaryote. Species are labeled with different colors based on their inferred HGT rates: red, >4%; yellow, 3%–4%; pink, 2%–3%; blue, 1%–2%; green, <1%. Taxonomy labels are (A) Euryarchaea, (B) Proteobacteria, (C) Chlamydiae, (D) Spirochaetes, (E) Thermotogae, (F) Aquificae, (G) Actinobacteria, (H) Deinococcus, (I) Cyanobacteria, (J) Firmicutes, and (K) Fungi.


Despite the uncertainties in reconstructing phylogenies back to the beginings of life, progress is being made in reconstructing the tree of life in the face of uncertainties raised by HGT. The uncertainty of any inferred phylogenetic tree based on a single gene can be resolved by using several common genes or even evidence from whole genomes [29]. One such approach, sometimes called 'multi-locus typing', has been used to deduce phylogenic trees for organisms that exchange genes, such as meningitis bacteria[30].

Jonathan Eisen and Claire Fraser have pointed out that:

"In building the tree of life, analysis of whole genomes has begun to supplement, and in some cases to improve upon, studies previously done with one or a few genes. For example, recent studies of complete bacterial genomes have suggested that the hyperthermophilic species are not deeply branching; if this is true, it casts doubt on the idea that the first forms of life were thermophiles. Analysis of the genome of the eukaryotic parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi supports suggestions that the group Microsporidia are not deep branching protists but are in fact members of the fungal kingdom. Genome analysis can even help resolve relationships within species, such as by providing new genetic markers for population genetics studies in the bacteria causing anthrax or tuberculosis. In all these studies, it is the additional data provided by a complete genome sequence that allows one to separate the phylogenetic signal from the noise. This is not to say the tree of life is now resolved — we only have sampled a smattering of genomes, and many groups are not yet touched"[31]

These approaches are enabling estimates of the relative frequency of HGT; the relatively low values that have been observed suggests that the 'tree' is still a valid metaphor for evolution - but the tree is adorned with 'cobwebs' of horizontally transferred genes. This is the main conclusion of a 2005 study of more than 40 complete microbial genomic sequences by Fan Ge, Li-San Wang, and Junhyong Kim. They estimate the frequency of HGT events at about 2% of core genes per genome.[32]. Similar whole genome approaches to assessing evolution are also enabling progress in identifying very early events in the tree of life, such as a proposal that eukaryotes arose by fusion of two complete but very diverse prokaryote genomes: one from a bacterium and one from an archaeal cell.[33]

See also

References

Citations

  1. ↑ Suwwan de Felipe K et al (2005) Evidence for acquisition of Legionella type IV secretion substrates via interdomain horizontal gene transfer J Bacteriol 187:7716-26
  2. ↑ Kondo N et al (2002) Genome fragment of Wolbachia endosymbiont transferred to X chromosome of host insect PNAS USA 99:14280-5
  3. ↑ Intrieri MC, Buiatti M (2001) The horizontal transfer of Agrobacterium rhizogenes genes and the evolution of the genus Nicotiana. Mol Phylogen Evol 20:100-10 PMID 11421651
  4. ↑ Adams KL et al(2000) Repeated, recent and diverse transfers of a mitochondrial gene to the nucleus in flowering plants Nature 408:354 PMID 11099041
  5. ↑ Robertson HM (1993) The mariner transposable element is widespread in insects Nature 362:241-5 PMID 8384700
    • Robertson HM (1996) Reconstruction of the ancient mariners of humans Nature Genetics 12:360-1 PMID 8630486
  6. ↑ de Felipe KS et al (2005) Evidence for acquisition of Legionella type IV secretion substrates via interdomain horizontal gene transfer J Bacteriol 187:7716-26
  7. ↑ Richards TA et al (2003) Protist 1:17–32 PMID 12812367
    • Graham H et al (2003) The amitochondriate eukaryote Trichomonas vaginalis contains a divergent thioredoxin-linked peroxiredoxin antioxidant system JBC M304359200
    • Andersson JO et al (2006) Evolution of four gene families with patchy phylogenetic distributions: influx of genes into protist genomes BMC Evol Biol 6:27
    • de Koning AP et al (2000) Lateral gene transfer and metabolic adaptation in the human parasite Trichomonas vaginalis. Mol Biol Evol 17:1769-73
    • Loftus B et al (2005) The genome of the protist parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Nature 433:865-8 PMID 15729342
    • Huang J et al (2004) Phylogenomic evidence supports past endosymbiosis, intracellular and horizontal gene transfer in Cryptosporidium parvum. Genome Biol 5:R88
  8. ↑ Weinbauer MG et al (2004) Are viruses driving microbial diversification and diversity? Envir Microbiol 6:1-11
    • Paul JH (1999) Microbial gene transfer J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 1:45–50
    • Fuhrman JA (1999) Marine viruses and their biogeochemical and ecological effects Nature 399:541–8 PMID 10376593
  9. ↑ Yoon HS et al (2005) Tertiary endosymbiosis driven genome evolution in dinoflagellate algae Mol Biol Evol 22:1299-308
  10. ↑ Zhu J et al (2000) The bases of crown gall tumorigenesis J Bacteriol 182:3885-95 This article describes the biology of crown-gall bacterium, and the mechanism of DNA injection by this bacterium, and explains how genes can move between bacterial species and from bacteria to eukaryotic organisms, and illustrates the extent to which different species can co-evolve
  11. ↑ Weinbauer et al (2004) Are viruses driving microbial diversification and diversity? Envir Microbiol 6:1-11
    • Amoils S (2005) Analysing incompatibility — Wolbachia on the couch Nature Rev Microbiol 3:667
    • Besser TE et al (2006) Greater diversity of Shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophage insertion sites among Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolates from cattle than from humans Appl Environ Microbiol PMID 17142358
  12. ↑ Loftus B et al (2005) The genome of the protist parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Nature 433:865-8 PMID 15729342
  13. ↑ Huang J et al (2004) Phylogenomic evidence supports past endosymbiosis, intracellular and horizontal gene transfer in Cryptosporidium parvum. Genome Biol 5:R88 PMID 15535864
  14. ↑ de Koning et al (2000) Lateral gene transfer and metabolic adaptation in the human parasite Trichomonas vaginalis. Mol Biol Evol 17:1769-73
  15. ↑ Doolittle WF (1998) You are what you eat: a gene transfer ratchet could account for bacterial genes in eukaryotic nuclear genomes Trends Genet 14:307-11 PMID 9724962
  16. ↑ Hall CS et al(2005) Contribution of horizontal gene transfer to the evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 4:1102-1115
  17. ↑ Dujon B et al {2004) Genome evolution in yeasts Nature 430:35-44 PMID 15229592
  18. ↑ Gray MW (1993) Origin and evolution of organelle genomes Curr Opin Genet Dev 3:884-90 PMID 8118213
  19. ↑ Shrestha K et al (2001) Evidence for paclitaxel from three new endophytic fungi of Himalayan yew of Nepal Planta Med 67:374-6 PMID 11458463
  20. ↑ Robertson HM et al (1996) Reconstruction of the ancient 'mariners' of humans Nature Genetics 12:360-361 PMID 8630486
  21. ↑ Kondo N et al (2002) Genome fragment of Wolbachia endosymbiont transferred to X chromosome of host insect PNAS USA 99:14280-5
  22. ↑ Woese C et al (1990). "Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya". PNAS USA 87: 4576-9. PMID 2112744.
    • Woese C, Fox G (1977). "Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms". PNAS USA 74: 5088-90. PMID 270744.
  23. ↑ Yap WH et al. (1999) Distinct types of rRNA operons exist in the genome of the actinomycete Thermomonspora chromogena and evidence for horizontal gene transfer of an entire rRNA operon. J. Bacteriol. 181 : 5201-9. PMID 10464188
  24. ↑ Simonson AB et al. Decoding the genomic tree of life. (2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102 Suppl 1:6608-13. PMID 15851667
  25. ↑ Horizontal Gene Transfer, Oklahoma State
  26. ↑ Doolittle WF (2000) Uprooting the tree of life Sci Am 282:90-5 PMID 10710791
  27. ↑ Gogarten JP 'Horizontal Gene Transfer - A New Paradigm for Biology' PhD thesis
    • Zhaxybayeva O, Gogarten JP (2004) Cladogenesis, coalescence and the evolution of the three domains of life Trends in Genetics 20:
  28. ↑ Ge F et al The cobweb of life revealed by genome-scale estimates of horizontal gene transfer PLoS Biol 3(10), e316
  29. ↑ Henz SR et al (2005) Whole-genome prokaryotic phylogeny Bioinformatics 21:2329-35 PMID 15166018
    • Fitzpatrick DA et al (2006) A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis BMC Evol Biol 6:99
  30. ↑ Urwin R, Maiden MC (2003) Multi-locus sequence typing: a tool for global epidemiology Trends Microbiol 11:479-87
    • Yang Z (2002) Likelihood and Bayes estimation of ancestral population sizes in hominoids using data from multiple loci Genetics 162:1811-23
    • Jennings WB, Edwards SV (2005) Speciational history of Australian grass finches (Poephila) inferred from thirty gene trees Evolution Int J Org Evolution 59:2033-47 PMID 16261740
  31. ↑ Eisen JA, Fraser CM (2003) Viewpoint phylogenomics: intersection of evolution and genomics Science 300:1706-7 DOI: 10.1126/science.1086292
  32. ↑ Ge F et al (2005) The Cobweb of Life revealed by genome-scale estimates of horizontal gene transfer PLoS Biol 3(10):e316
  33. ↑ Rivera MC and Lake JA (2004) The ring of life provides evidence for a genome fusion origin of eukaryotes. Nature 431:152-5 PMID 15356622
    • Simonson AB et al. Decoding the genomic tree of life. (2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102 Suppl 1:6608-13. PMID 15851667

Further Reading

  • Salzberg SL et al (2001) Microbial genes in the human genome: lateral transfer or gene loss?" Science 292:1903-6. This reports that one dramatic claim of HGT - in which a distinguished group of scientists claimed that bacteria transferred their DNA directly into the human lineage - was simply wrong [1]
  • Weinbauer MG, Rassoulzadegan F (2004) Are viruses driving microbial diversification and diversity? Envir Microbiol 6:1-11 Discussion of both the evolutionary and ecological activities of viruses in the ocean, a major source of HGT in nature.
  • Woese C (2002) On the evolution of cells PNAS USA 99:8742-7 This article shifts the emphasis in early phylogenic adaptation from vertical to horizontal gene transfer.
  • Hall C et al (2005) Contribution of horizontal gene transfer to the evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Eukaryot Cell 4:1102-15Convincing evidence of horizontal transfer of bacterial DNA:
  • "Mobile DNA". Berg DE, Howe MM (Eds.)(1989) American Society for Microbiology. Washington D.C. Book with a comprehensive discussion of mobile DNA, jumping genes, transposons etc in many organisms, not only bacteria. Reviewed by Freeling M (1990) in Q Rev Biol 65:217-8
  • Snel B et al (1999) Genome phylogeny based on gene content Nature Genetics 21:66-7 [2]Proposal for using the presence or absence of a set of genes to infer phylogenies, in order to avoid confounding factors such as HGT.
  • Horizontal Gene Transfer Syvanen M, Kado CI (2002) 2nd edition, Academic Press ISBN 0-12-680126-6 A comprehensive treatise. Reviewed here by M-W Ho

External links


Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Horizontal_gene_transfer/Citable_Version&oldid=79732"