Safety and survivability of naval vessels

From Citizendium
Revision as of 21:35, 30 September 2008 by imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (Iowa turret explosion)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Template:TOC-right Most modern warships have high-power radar and radio equipment that require significant safety precautions. [1]Aircraft carriers and warships operating helicopters also offer the danger of being run over by aircraft, sucked into jet engines, cut in half by a snapped arresting wire.

These hazards are present in peacetime, when the sea is both friend and foe. In active warfare, natural and "friendly" threats are joined by other people using their best ability to do more damage than the sea.

No man will be a sailor who has contrivance enough to get himself into a jail; for being in a ship is being in a jail, with the chance of being drowned... a man in a jail has more room, better food, and commonly better company — Samuel Johnson

Beyond the measures prescribed for civilian vessels by the Safety of Life at Sea convention, warships need specialized protective systems as well as procedures for safe handling of things designed to blow up and break things.

Compartmentation

In general, warships are most concerned about being struck by a torpedo or mine, which explode below the waterline, than from shells or bombs. Underwater explosions let water in, while hits above the waterline will provide a path for air — unless they spread fire, or penetrate deeply enough to create holes below the waterline.

Flooding and fire protection

Chemical, biological and radiological protection

Electromagnetic Hazards

Intense electromagnetic radiation is a constant concern

Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Personnel (HERP)

Radar and communication systems, which use high-power RF transmitters and high-gain antennas represent a biological hazard to personnel working on, or in the vicinity of, these systems. The detrimental effects of overexposure to RFR are associated with an increase in overall body temperature or a temperature rise in specific organs of the body. High-level electromagnetic energy can also induce electrical currents or voltages that may cause shocks and burns. An RF burn is the result of RF current flow through that portion of the body in direct contact with a conductive object (in which an RF voltage has been induced) or at the site/+ of a spark discharge (no direct contact with a conductive object).

Antenna work presents both RF and fall hazards

The use of HF transmitters (1 kilowatt and up) and the complicated structure and rigging aboard ship, especially cargo ships, has increased the probability of voltages being induced on various objects. The handling of metallic cargo lines while shipboard HF transmitters are radiating can be hazardous to ship’s personnel. On numerous occasions, RF voltages have been encountered on items such as crane hooks, running rigging, booms, missile launchers, and parked aircraft. These voltages, which may be sufficient to cause injury, are induced on the metallic items by radiation from nearby transmitting antennas.

In addition to electromagnetic radiation hazards, there are other physical hazards to Navy personnel working aloft on shipboard radar antennas. Working aloft presents a fall hazard. In addition, rotating antennas might accidentally be energized causing an injury from contact or a fall.

Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Fuel (HERF)

Fuel vapors can be ignited by RF induced arcs during fuel handling operations close to high powered radar and radio transmitting antennas. For example, many ships carry at least one helicopter or have the ability to refuel a helicopter and carry fuel to support helo operations.

Hazard of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance (HERO)

The high intensity RFR fields produced by modern radio and radar transmitting equipment can cause sensitive electrically initiated devices (EIDs), classically known as electro-explosive devices (EEDs), contained in ordnance systems to actuate prematurely. RFR energy may enter an ordnance item through a hole or crack in its skin or through firing leads, wires, and so on. In general, electrically initiated ordnance systems are most susceptible during assembly, disassembly, loading, unloading, and handling in RFR electromagnetic fields. The potential dangers to ordnance and fuels are obvious because there could be an explosive chain reaction.

Fire aboard USS Forrestal, June 1967

Other electrical problems can affect ordnance. In the image, fire, 134 men were killed and 161 injured, started when an Zuni air-to-ground 5" rocket, aboard an F-4 Phantom II fighter, piloted by Jim Bangert fired, when it was switched from external to internal electrical power. [2] The rocket and its launching triple ejector rack each had a separate electrical connector that enabled the rocket to be launched. The two arming connectors were to be inserted, under standard operating procedures, only when the aircraft was on the catapult, weapons aimed in a safe direction. To improve speed, the ship's Weapons Coordination Board approved the early insertion of one of the pins. Unfortunately, the WCB board never forwarded its recommendation to higher authority, and, without consultation, flight deck crews had also decided to find a faster way to launch, by pre-inserting a connector.

Unfortunately, that connector was the second of the two. Each group assumed that the other pin was not yet installed, so the fighter was moved along the deck with both arming pins in place. When the rocket fired, it shot across the deck and hit an A-4 Skyhawk attack aircraft piloted by John McCain, tearing open its fuel tank and starting a major fire, which, in turn, set off bombs.

Explosive ordnance safety

The Forrestal fire, as well as the earlier Oriskany fire were especially catastrophic because the best-trained firefighters were killed or disabled in the first blast. One of the traditions of the U.S. Marine Corps is that every Marine, of every rank and skill, is always qualified as a rifleman. The U.S. Navy had already had a strong tradition of training in damage control, but these incidents led to a tradition that every sailor is always qualified as a firefighter.

Destroyer USS Rupertus maneuvers alongside aircraft carrier USS Forrestal to fight fire

Since carrier aircraft and naval ordnance are in much closer proximity than at a land base, bombs, missiles, and other ordnance approved for carrier use often has a coating of thermal insulation, to buy more time for firefighters and explosive ordnance disposal personnel to get to the endangered weapon. These explosives also are likelier to be in strong electromagnetic fields than on shore. When Army helicopters began to operate from Naval vessels, they often had to jettison their weapons into the sea before landing, since the Army weapons had neither the thermal nor the electromagnetic protection required for carrier safety.

Turret explosion aboard battleship USS Iowa

During a firing exercise, there was a catastrophic explosion in a 16" gun turret aboard the battleship USS Iowa'. The cause has never been definitively established, but the most generally accepted technical explanation is that bags of loose propellant (i.e., smokeless gunpowder) were rammed too quickly into the breech of the gun. [3] Many turret explosions have been attributed to naval guns of this type, which are no longer used. While extensive safety measures were used to prevent accidental sparks near propellant, or even more catastrophic turret explosions that extended into the stored ammunition in the magazine below, safety measures were often overridden in the interest of speed in battle. The motivation is understandable, as not firing fast enough to stop enemy fire can be as lethal as mistakes with one's own weapons.

Aircraft operations safety

References

  1. Naval Safety Center, Acquisition Safety - Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) Hazards
  2. O’ Connor, Bryan & Jim Lloyd (January 2008), Forrestal in Flames: Explosions Aboard USS Forrestal, U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. Charles, Dan, "[14 September 1991 Battleship blast was accident, not suicide]", New Scientist