Archive:Ombudsman Appeals

|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"|  |}

Appeals are governed by the following articles of the Charter. Article 41:Appeals of formal decisions shall be possible when a disputant can show an Appeals Board that either:

1.New information is available; or 2.A technical error was made during the previous formal procedure.

Article 42 •An Appeals Board shall consist of Citizens who were not previously directly involved, as follows: 1.one member appointed by the Editorial Council, 2.one member appointed by the Management Council, and 3.the Ombudsman or his/her designee.

Article 43 An Appeals Board may render one of three decisions: it may decide that the disputant does not have new information or that the adjudicating council made no technical error and deny a re-hearing; it may affirm the adjudicating council's decision, in spite of new information or technical error; or it may recognize that new information, a technical error, or both has placed the adjudicating council's decision in error and remand the case to the adjudicating council for rehearing. If the case has been remanded for re-hearing, it is expected that the adjudicating council revise its judgment in light of the appeal.