Adam Ferguson: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng
imported>Gareth Leng
Line 21: Line 21:
<blockquote>"Like the winds that we come we know not whence and blow whither soever they list, the forces of society are derived from an obscure and distant origin. They arise before the date of philosophy, from the instincts, not the speculations of men." (Ferguson, 1767).</blockquote>
<blockquote>"Like the winds that we come we know not whence and blow whither soever they list, the forces of society are derived from an obscure and distant origin. They arise before the date of philosophy, from the instincts, not the speculations of men." (Ferguson, 1767).</blockquote>
    
    
Ferguson's ethical system treats man as a social being, illustrating his doctrines by political examples. As a believer in the progress of the human race, he placed the principle of moral approbation in the attainment of perfection. Victor Cousin criticized Ferguson's speculations <ref>Cousin, Victor. Cours d'histoire de la philosophie morale an dix-huitième siècle, pt. II., 1839-1840</ref>:
Ferguson's ethical system treats man as a social being, illustrating his doctrines by political examples. As a believer in the progress of the human race, he placed the principle of moral approbation in the attainment of perfection. Victor Cousin criticized Ferguson's speculations <ref>Cousin, Victor. ''Cours d'histoire de la philosophie morale an dix-huitième siècle'', pt. II., 1839-1840</ref>:
"We find in his method the wisdom and circumspection of the Scottish school, with something more masculine and decisive in the results. The principle of perfection is a new one, at once more rational and comprehensive than benevolence and sympathy, which in our view places Ferguson as a moralist above all his predecessors."
"We find in his method the wisdom and circumspection of the Scottish school, with something more masculine and decisive in the results. The principle of perfection is a new one, at once more rational and comprehensive than benevolence and sympathy, which in our view places Ferguson as a moralist above all his predecessors."


By this principle Ferguson attempted to reconcile all moral systems. With Thomas Hobbes and Hume he admits the power of self-interest or utility, and makes it enter into morals as the law of self-preservation. Francis Hutcheson's theory of universal benevolence and Adam Smith's idea of sympathy he combines under the law of society. But, as these laws appear as the means rather than the end of human destiny, they remain subordinate to a supreme end, and the supreme end of perfection.
By this principle Ferguson attempted to reconcile all moral systems. With [[Thomas Hobbes]] and Hume he admits the power of self-interest or utility, and makes it enter into morals as the law of self-preservation. [[Francis Hutcheson]]'s theory of universal benevolence and [[Adam Smith]]'s idea of sympathy he combines under the law of society. But, as these laws appear as the means rather than the end of human destiny, they remain subordinate to a supreme end, and the supreme end of perfection.


In the political part of his system Ferguson follows [[Montesquieu]], and pleads the cause of well-regulated liberty and free government. His contemporaries, with the exception of Hume, regarded his writings as of great importance, but he made minimal original contributions. <ref>Stephen, Leslie. 1949. ''History of English thought in the eighteenth century.'' New York,: P. Smith.
In the political part of his system Ferguson follows [[Montesquieu]], and pleads the cause of well-regulated liberty and free government. His contemporaries, with the exception of Hume, regarded his writings as of great importance, but he made minimal original contributions. <ref>Stephen, Leslie. 1949. ''History of English thought in the eighteenth century.'' New York,: P. Smith.

Revision as of 13:32, 27 January 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Editor's Note: Citations to the published works named in this article will be added.

Adam Ferguson, also known as Ferguson of Raith (June 20, 1723 O.S. - February 22, 1816) was a philosopher and historian of the Scottish Enlightenment, and is widely regarded as one of the founding fathers of sociology. His first appointment was as a chaplain to The Black Watch. Gradually losing his faith, Ferguson succeeded David Hume as librarian to the Faculty of Advocates in Edinburgh. He held successive chairs at the University of Edinburgh, first in Natural Philosophy, then in Moral Philosophy and Pneumatics. In 1767, he published his masterpiece, the Essay on Civil Society.


Life

Born at Logierait in Atholl, Perthshire, Scotland, Adam Ferguson was educated at Perth grammar school and at the University of St Andrews. In 1745, owing to his knowledge of Gaelic, he was appointed as deputy chaplain of the 43rd (afterwards the 42nd) regiment (The Black Watch); his license to preach was granted him by special dispensation as he had not completed the required six years of theological study. It remains a matter of debate as to whether, at the Battle of Fontenoy (1745), Ferguson fought in the ranks throughout the day, and refused to leave the field, though ordered to do so by his colonel. Nevertheless, he certainly did well, becoming principal chaplain in 1746. He continued attached to the regiment till 1754, when, disappointed at not obtaining a living, he left the clergy and resolved to devote himself to literary pursuits.

After living in Leipzig for a time, he returned to University of Edinburgh where in January 1757 he succeeded David Hume as librarian to the Faculty of Advocates (see Advocates' Library), but soon relinquished this office on becoming tutor in the family of the Earl of Bute. In 1759 Ferguson became professor of natural philosophy in the University of Edinburgh, and in 1764 transferred to the chair of "pneumatics" (mental philosophy) "and moral philosophy."

In 1767, against Hume's advice, he published his Essay on the History of Civil Society, which was well received and translated into several European languages. In the mid 1770's he traveled again to the Continent and met Voltaire. His membership of The Poker Club is recorded in its Minute Book of 1776. In 1776 his (anonymous) pamphlet on the American Revolution appeared in opposition to Dr Richard Price's Observations on the Nature of Civil Liberty, in which he sympathized with the views of the British parliament. In 1778 Ferguson was appointed secretary to the Carlisle Commission which endeavored without success to negotiate an arrangement with the American colonies, engaged in revolution.

In 1783 his History of the Progress and Termination of the Roman Republic was published. It became very popular and went through several editions. Ferguson believed that the history of the Roman Republic during the period of their greatness formed a practical illustration of those ethical and political doctrines in which he was particularly interested. The history reads well and impartially, and displays conscientious use of sources. The influence of the author's military experience shows itself in certain portions of the narrative. Tired of teaching, he resigned his professorship in 1785, and devoted himself to revising his lectures, which he published (1792) under the title of Principles of Moral and Political Science.

In his seventieth year, Ferguson, intending to prepare a new edition of the history, visited Italy and some of the principal cities of Europe. From 1795 he resided successively at the old castle of Neidpath near Peebles, at Hallyards on Manor Water and at St Andrews, where he died on February 22, 1816.

Thought

"Like the winds that we come we know not whence and blow whither soever they list, the forces of society are derived from an obscure and distant origin. They arise before the date of philosophy, from the instincts, not the speculations of men." (Ferguson, 1767).

Ferguson's ethical system treats man as a social being, illustrating his doctrines by political examples. As a believer in the progress of the human race, he placed the principle of moral approbation in the attainment of perfection. Victor Cousin criticized Ferguson's speculations [1]: "We find in his method the wisdom and circumspection of the Scottish school, with something more masculine and decisive in the results. The principle of perfection is a new one, at once more rational and comprehensive than benevolence and sympathy, which in our view places Ferguson as a moralist above all his predecessors."

By this principle Ferguson attempted to reconcile all moral systems. With Thomas Hobbes and Hume he admits the power of self-interest or utility, and makes it enter into morals as the law of self-preservation. Francis Hutcheson's theory of universal benevolence and Adam Smith's idea of sympathy he combines under the law of society. But, as these laws appear as the means rather than the end of human destiny, they remain subordinate to a supreme end, and the supreme end of perfection.

In the political part of his system Ferguson follows Montesquieu, and pleads the cause of well-regulated liberty and free government. His contemporaries, with the exception of Hume, regarded his writings as of great importance, but he made minimal original contributions. [2] His work was especially influential for German writers, such as George F.W. Hegel and Marx.

Editors' Note: This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.

References

  1. Cousin, Victor. Cours d'histoire de la philosophie morale an dix-huitième siècle, pt. II., 1839-1840
  2. Stephen, Leslie. 1949. History of English thought in the eighteenth century. New York,: P. Smith. 89-90).