Argument (philosophy): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joseph Bessie No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger (Okey dokey, how about this?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An '''argument''', in [[logic]] and [[philosophy]], may be defined in its most ordinary sense as a set of statements, one | An '''argument''', in [[logic]] and [[philosophy]], may be defined in its most ordinary sense as a set of statements, one of which (the ''conclusion'') is intended or purported to be supported by the others (the ''premises'' or ''premisses''). The premises are reasons intended to show that the conclusion is, or is probably, true. | ||
When an argument is presented to show that its conclusion is true (not just probably true), the argument is called ''deductive''. When an argument is presented to show that its conclusion is ''probably'' true, the argument is called ''inductive''. | When an argument is presented to show that its conclusion is true (not just probably true), the argument is called ''deductive''. When an argument is presented to show that its conclusion is ''probably'' true, the argument is called ''inductive''. | ||
Revision as of 22:04, 8 November 2007
An argument, in logic and philosophy, may be defined in its most ordinary sense as a set of statements, one of which (the conclusion) is intended or purported to be supported by the others (the premises or premisses). The premises are reasons intended to show that the conclusion is, or is probably, true.
When an argument is presented to show that its conclusion is true (not just probably true), the argument is called deductive. When an argument is presented to show that its conclusion is probably true, the argument is called inductive.