Argument (philosophy): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joseph Bessie
(Just the start (stub) of an article on 'argument'.)
imported>Larry Sanger
(Well, it's a start!)
Line 1: Line 1:
An '''argument''', in the philosophical sense of that word, may be defined as a set of statements.  One member of the set is the argument's ''conclusion'', while the rest are its ''premises''.  The premises are reasons presented to show that the conclusion is, or is probably, true.
An '''argument''', in [[logic]] and [[philosophy]], may be defined as a set of statements, one member of which, the ''conclusion,'' is supported by the others, called the ''premises'' (or ''premisses'').  The premises are reasons presented to show that the conclusion is, or is probably, true.


When an argument is presented to prove that its conclusion is true (not just probably true), the argument is called ''deductive''.  When an argument is presented to prove that its conclusion is ''probably'' true, the argument is called ''inductive''.
When an argument is presented to prove that its conclusion is true (not just probably true), the argument is called ''deductive''.  When an argument is presented to prove that its conclusion is ''probably'' true, the argument is called ''inductive''.
[[Category:CZ Live]]
[[Category:Stub Articles]]
[[Category:Philosophy Workgroup]]

Revision as of 08:55, 8 November 2007

An argument, in logic and philosophy, may be defined as a set of statements, one member of which, the conclusion, is supported by the others, called the premises (or premisses). The premises are reasons presented to show that the conclusion is, or is probably, true.

When an argument is presented to prove that its conclusion is true (not just probably true), the argument is called deductive. When an argument is presented to prove that its conclusion is probably true, the argument is called inductive.