CZ:Featured article/Current: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park
(→‎Vacuum distillation: Standard argument against free will)
imported>John Stephenson
(template)
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== '''[[Standard argument against free will]]''' ==
{{:{{FeaturedArticleTitle}}}}
----
<small>
The '''standard argument against free will''' is an argument that there exists a conflict between the possibility of [[free will]] and the postulates of [[determinism]] and [[indeterminism]]. A number of authors use this terminology.<ref name=Hobbs/><ref name=Doyle/>
==Footnotes==
 
A formal statement of the 'standard argument' can be phrased as follows:<ref name=BDoyle/><ref name=JMFischer/>
:1.&emsp;The concept of determinism contradicts that of free will.
:2.&emsp;The concept of indeterminism also contradicts free will.
:3.&emsp;Some occurrences are governed by determinism, and all the rest by indeterminism.
 
all of which lead to the conclusion:
:4.&emsp;Free will does not govern any occurrences (does not exist).
 
The first two premises sometimes are referred to as the "deterministic" and "indeterministic" horns of the [[dilemma of determinism]],<ref name=FischerDoyle/>  the conflict between the intuition of personal autonomy and the intuition that the world proceeds in a manner independent of human concerns.
 
''[[Standard argument against free will|.... (read more)]]''
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;"
|-
! style="text-align: center;" | &nbsp;[[Standard argument against free will#References|notes]]
|-
|
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
|}
</small>

Latest revision as of 10:19, 11 September 2020

Napoleon (Napoleon Bonaparte or, after 1804, Napoleon I, Emperor of the French) was a world historic figure and dictator of France from 1799 to 1814. He was the greatest general of his age--perhaps any age, with a sure command of battlefield tactics and campaign strategies, As a civil leader he played a major role in the French Revolution, then ended it when he became dictator in 1799 and Emperor of France in 1804 He modernized the French military, fiscal, political legal and religious systems. He fought an unending series of wars against Britain with a complex, ever-changing coalition of European nations on both sides. Refusing to compromise after his immense defeat in Russia in 1812, he was overwhelmed by a coalition of enemies and abdicated in 1814. In 1815 he returned from exile, took control of France, built a new army, and in 100 days almost succeeded--but was defeated at Waterloo and exiled to a remote island. His image and memory are central to French national identity, but he is despised by the British and Russians and is a controversial figure in Germany and elsewhere in Europe.

The Trail of Napoleon - J.F. Horrabin - Map.jpg

Rise to Power

Once the Revolution had begun, so many of the aristocratic officers turned against the Revolutionary government, or were exiled or executed, that a vacuum of senior leadership resulted. Promotions came very quickly now, and loyalty to the Revolution was as important as technical skill; Napoleon had both. His demerits were overlooked as he was twice reinstated, promoted, and allowed to collect his back pay. Paris knew him as an intellectual soldier deeply involved in politics. His first test of military genius came at Toulon in 1793, where the British had seized this key port. Napoleon, an acting Lieutenant-Colonel, used his artillery to force the British to abandon the city. He was immediately promoted by the Jacobin radicals under Robespierre to brigadier-general, joining the ranks of several brilliant young generals. He played a major role in defending Paris itself from counter-revolutionaries, and became the operational planner for the Army of Italy and planned two successful attacks in April 1794. He married Josephine (Rose de Beauharnais) in 1796, after falling violently in love with the older aristocratic widow.[1]

Footnotes

  1. Englund pp 63-73, 91-2, 97-8