CZ Talk:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chris day
imported>Howard Arvi Hughes
m (removed comment)
Line 3: Line 3:
You're right!  What do you think of the first section now? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:04, 15 February 2007 (CST)
You're right!  What do you think of the first section now? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:04, 15 February 2007 (CST)
: Exciting. That's it.--[[User:Aleksander Halicz|Alex Halicz]] [[User_Talk:Aleksander Halicz|<small><span style="color:#017701">(hello)</span></small>]] 09:08, 15 February 2007 (CST)
: Exciting. That's it.--[[User:Aleksander Halicz|Alex Halicz]] [[User_Talk:Aleksander Halicz|<small><span style="color:#017701">(hello)</span></small>]] 09:08, 15 February 2007 (CST)
:I agree with Alex :) --[[User:Rilson Versuri|Versuri]] 09:14, 15 February 2007 (CST)


== Infoboxes ==
== Infoboxes ==

Revision as of 16:57, 17 February 2007

What about encouraging writing from scratch in this article? Being WP-inspired, WP-suggested, but independent and not WP-tied-to? I think that this may have some far reaching consequences. I put a longer post about it on the forum. --Alex Halicz (hello) 08:32, 15 February 2007 (CST) Ps. WP stands for Wikipedia

You're right! What do you think of the first section now? --Larry Sanger 09:04, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Exciting. That's it.--Alex Halicz (hello) 09:08, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Infoboxes

I brought a couple infobox templates over from WP, now that I've read this article I think I made them in error, especially considering the number of dead branches they contain. What can be done about this?

They may be useful if you tweek them and remove the need for dead branches. We will need info-like templates for the future and some have been brought over. Chris Day (Talk) 18:10, 15 February 2007 (CST)