Creationism: Revision history

12 June 2023

• curprev 04:2304:23, 12 June 2023‎ Peter Jackson talk contribs‎ 26,375 bytes +257‎ No edit summary

11 June 2023

• curprev 09:5309:53, 11 June 2023‎ Pat Palmer talk contribs‎ m 26,118 bytes +10‎ Text replacement - "Tennessee (U.S. state)" to "Tennessee"
• curprev 09:5109:51, 11 June 2023‎ Pat Palmer talk contribs‎ m 26,108 bytes +13‎ Text replacement - "Tennessee" to "Tennessee (U.S. state)"

10 March 2011

• curprev 20:3320:33, 10 March 2011‎ imported>Joshua Zambrano‎ m 26,095 bytes +26,095‎ →‎History: wording change
• curprev 20:2820:28, 10 March 2011‎ imported>Joshua Zambrano‎ 26,047 bytes −283‎ →‎History: removing unsourced, opinionated statements per talk page
• curprev 20:1720:17, 10 March 2011‎ imported>Joshua Zambrano‎ 26,330 bytes +1,710‎ →‎History: adding detail about Darwinian reference to parent species, Lyell background (and typo fix), and citation needed template

21 August 2010

• curprev 07:3507:35, 21 August 2010‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ 24,620 bytes +2,623‎ No edit summary

2 April 2010

• curprev 22:5922:59, 2 April 2010‎ imported>Douglass A. Glidden‎ 22,005 bytes +8‎ improved wording (I hope)

23 March 2010

• curprev 18:3118:31, 23 March 2010‎ imported>Daniel Mietchen‎ 21,997 bytes −6‎ in that both make claims for which no independently reproducible evidence exists
• curprev 16:5616:56, 23 March 2010‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 21,869 bytes −134‎ How can a religious belief be pseudoscience?
• curprev 16:5516:55, 23 March 2010‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 22,011 bytes +8‎ some Creationists also promote Creation Science

15 February 2010

• curprev 00:1600:16, 15 February 2010‎ imported>Meg Taylor‎ m 22,003 bytes +7,407‎ spelling: Vetinary -> Veterinary

30 September 2009

• curprev 16:3516:35, 30 September 2009‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ 22,001 bytes +6,289‎ No edit summary
• curprev 03:5603:56, 30 September 2009‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ 18,511 bytes +2,799‎ No edit summary

29 September 2009

• curprev 19:4619:46, 29 September 2009‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ m 15,712 bytes +19‎ →‎The Scopes trial
• curprev 19:4419:44, 29 September 2009‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ m 15,712 bytes 0‎ No edit summary
• curprev 19:3719:37, 29 September 2009‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ m 15,712 bytes +4‎ →‎The rise of "scientific creationism"
• curprev 19:3619:36, 29 September 2009‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ m 15,708 bytes 0‎ →‎History
• curprev 19:3519:35, 29 September 2009‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ m 15,708 bytes 0‎ →‎Reaction from scientists
• curprev 19:3319:33, 29 September 2009‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ m 15,708 bytes +16‎ →‎Reaction from scientists: main verb; change verb to avoid repetition
• curprev 19:3119:31, 29 September 2009‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ m 15,692 bytes −1‎ →‎Reaction from scientists
• curprev 19:3019:30, 29 September 2009‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ m 15,693 bytes 0‎ →‎Reaction from scientists
• curprev 17:5517:55, 29 September 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 15,693 bytes +14‎ moved TOC to remove white space
• curprev 17:5117:51, 29 September 2009‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ 15,679 bytes +1,082‎ No edit summary

26 February 2009

• curprev 18:5918:59, 26 February 2009‎ imported>Dalton Holland Baptista‎ m 14,597 bytes +1‎ space between words lacking
• curprev 18:0118:01, 26 February 2009‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 14,596 bytes +875‎ called scientific creationism or Creation Science - synonymous terms
• curprev 17:5917:59, 26 February 2009‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 14,576 bytes +855‎ "intelligent design creationism" seems to be Scott's pet term
• curprev 17:5817:58, 26 February 2009‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 14,588 bytes +671‎ →‎Types of creationism: 2 main kinds; also ID != creationism
• curprev 17:5117:51, 26 February 2009‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 13,917 bytes +126‎ Astonishingly, there are multiple currents of thought within creationism

23 February 2009

• curprev 05:2905:29, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 13,791 bytes +149‎ →‎Reaction from scientists

22 February 2009

• curprev 17:5817:58, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 13,786 bytes +144‎ Replease note that most of the lede paragraph says that "Creationism" is considered by most believers to be the same as "young earth creationism". Scientists therefore *do* consider it a pseudoscience
• curprev 17:4517:45, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 13,642 bytes −79‎ The scientific community has no opinion on religious matters - are we confusing Creationism with "Creation Science" here?

9 July 2008

• curprev 17:1517:15, 9 July 2008‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ 13,721 bytes +3,309‎ added new section on reactions of scientists

8 July 2008

• curprev 05:2205:22, 8 July 2008‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ 10,412 bytes +10,298‎ changed from disambig page to an article

7 August 2007

• curprev 11:0311:03, 7 August 2007‎ imported>Aleksander Stos‎ m 114 bytes +114‎ disambig for a while

2 August 2007

• curprev 16:3616:36, 2 August 2007‎ imported>Anthony Argyriou‎ 101 bytes +28‎ add another

22 June 2007

• curprev 04:5404:54, 22 June 2007‎ imported>John Stephenson‎ 73 bytes +73‎ Category

4 June 2007

• curprev 11:3911:39, 4 June 2007‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 39 bytes +2‎ This shouldn't be just a redirect; creationism is a broader category than "young earth creationism"

27 May 2007

• curprev 01:1801:18, 27 May 2007‎ imported>John Stephenson‎ 37 bytes +37‎ Redirect for now