Deflation: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
Defined as a sustained fall in the general level of prices, '''deflation''' is not necessarily harmful, but there there is a danger that it could have disastrous economic consequences.
==The causes of deflation==
Deflation is in almost all cases a side effect of a collapse of aggregate demand--a drop in spending so severe that producers must cut prices  in order to find buyers.The economic effects of a deflationary episode, for the most part, are similar to those of any other sharp decline in aggregate spending--namely, recession, rising unemployment, and financial stress.
==The effects of deflation==
===First-round effects===
Deflation tends to make consumers reduce their purchases in the expectation of being able to buy  more cheaply at a later date.  That can have a depressing effect upon demand and lead to  a reduction of output.  Another potentially important  effect is to require borrowers to repay more than they had borrowed (for example, if prices declined by 20 percent, a farmer who had previously borrowed £100 to buy ten pigs would have to repay the equivalent of twelve pigs). The resulting loss to borrowers may be  balanced by gains to lenders, but if borrowers are forced to default, the resulting  disruption can lead to a further reduction in output.  Another effect is to require employers to pay their employees the same wages  despite a reduction in income from their employees' output. Unless there is a compensating wage reduction, that  may result in a reduction in employment and another reduction in output.
===Second-round effects : the "deflationary spiral"===
A sudden and unexpected deflation can  result in output losses that feed upon themselves by reinforcing the tendencies that produced them. For example the output loss from the deferrment of purchases could  lead to an increase in unemployment, which could  prompt a further reduction in spending and thus  a further increase in unemployment.
==Policy responses==
Central bank policy makers  generally, recommend early preemptive action to avert the danger of deflation - on the grounds that  it is difficult to devise effective policies to counter it once it has taken hold. Their principle precautionary weapon is a rapid relaxation of monetary policy by reductions in interest rates <ref>[http://www.federalreserve.gov/BOARDDOCS/SPEECHES/2002/20021121/default.htm Ben Bernanke: ''Deflation: Making Sure "It" Doesn't Happen Here'' (Remarks made at the National Economists Club, Washington, D.C. November 21, 2002) Federal Reserve Board 2002]</ref> <ref>[http://www.ecb.int/press/key/date/2008/html/sp081125.en.html Lorenzo Bini Smaghi, (Member of the Executive Board of the ECB): ''Careful with (the "d") words!'', speech to the  European Colloquia Series, Venice, 25 November 2008, European Central Bank 2008]</ref>. Most of them also advocate  supplementing  monetary action with short-term fiscal measures, especially when  interest rates approach zero and the ''liquidity trap''  renders conventional monetary policy ineffective <ref>[http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/bpea_jp.pdf Paul Krugman: ''It’s Baaack! Japan’s Slump and the Return of the Liquidity Trap'']</ref>. To deal with severe threats of deflation they also advocate supplementing interest rate cuts with direct action to increase the money supply by "printing money" (otherwise known as "''quantitative easing''"<ref> For an explanation of quantitative easing, see the article on [[banking]])</ref>). They recognise, however, that such remedies can be costly and difficult to manage. Delay is likely to reduce their effectiveness, but hurriedly-devised public expenditure projects are apt to be uneconomic. The intention would be to remove the stimulus once it had served it purpose, but public awareness of that intention could reduce its effectiveness (a quandary that prompted the economist Paul Krugman to suggest that "the way to make monetary policy effective, then, is for the central bank to credibly promise to be irresponsible" <ref>[http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/japtrap.html Paul Krugman: ''Japan's Trap" May 1998]</ref>). On the other hand, failure to reverse policy as recovery commences, creates a danger of inflation. Thus the  decision to launch  anti-deflation measures involves a balancing of risks, and their success  depends upon accurate diagnosis and rapid response to change.
==Historical experience==
===General===
===The great depression===
===Japan in the 1990s===
===Japan in the 1990s===



Revision as of 05:49, 19 December 2008

Japan in the 1990s

[1]

[2]


[3]

[4]





[5].


[6]




  1. [http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2002/729/ifdp729.pdf Alan Ahearne, Joseph Gagnon, Jane Haltmaier, and Steve Kamin and others: Preventing Deflation: Lessons from Japan’s Experience in the 1990s, International Finance Discussion Papers, Number 729 Federal Reserve Board, June 2002]
  2. Paul Krugman: A Special Page on Japan
  3. Paul Krugman The Hangover Theory Slate - The Dismal Science, December 1998
  4. Richard Katz: Deflation? Yes. Deflationary Spiral? No., The Oriental Economist Report, March 2002
  5. Richard Burdekin and Pierre Siklos (eds): "Fears of Deflation and Policy Responses Then and Now." In Deflation: Current and Historical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004
  6. Deflation: Determinants, Risks, and Policy Options, Findings of an Interdepartmental Task Force, International Monetary Fund, April 2003