Extrajudicial detention, U.S.

From Citizendium
Revision as of 10:19, 13 March 2009 by imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (User:Howard C. Berkowitz/EJUS moved to Extraditional detention, U.S.)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:TOC-right

For more information, see: Extrajudicial detention.
See also: User: Howard C. Berkowitz/EJUSGWB

Extrajudicial detention by the United States has taken place under a number of Administrations, sometimes during overt war, and, perhaps better known at present, directed against non-national threats. There has also been extraordinary rendition to third countries. Certain of these detentions have been considered generally consistent with customary international and U.S. law of the time, while others were much more controversial. Detention and rendition programs have been most extensive under the George W. Bush Administration; some have been repudiated by the successor Obama Administration.

While the United States had been enshrined process of due process in the Constitution of the United States, due process was principally focused on citizens, or at least those that were not women and not slaves. Interestingly for a "nation of immigrants", strong distinctions were made for aliens, as with the Alien and Sedition Act of 1789.[1] Health models have played a role in American detention. For a nation founded by immigrants, the country has used health detention and rstrictions to a strong extent. [2]

Some actions, such as the execution, as a spy, of a British Army major, John Andre, during the American Revolution were consistent with international treatment of spies. Military law, which, until recently, was the main basis of extrajudicial actions, was first promulgated as the Lieber Code during the American Civil War.


Post-revolutionary period

The Alien and Sedition Acts, upon the declaration of war, that aliens resident within the United States, not "chargeable with actual hostility, or other crime against the public safety" will be given time to collect their goods and depart. Once such a state exists, there would be apprehension and judicial review leading to deportation, bond for good behavior, or indefinite detention by the then-applicable regulations. They addressed "subversive" acts, but not in a strictly nonjudicial context.

Aspects of these Acts remained in force into the early twentieth century, and were used for prosecutions at least until 1920.

American Civil War

Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and detained many he considered threats to the Union. Ex parte Milligan was a detention case considered by the Supreme Court of the United States, in which the Court held that a citizen, in an area where the civilian courts were operating, could not be tried by a military commission.

First World War and interwar

Discussions of extrajudicial detention in the First World War period sometimes blur the true detention cases with judicial processes that criminalized dissent. Nevertheless, the key legislative authorities for actions hostile to civil liberties included the Espionage Act of 1917, Sedition Law of 1918, and provisions of the Selective Service Act and Trading with the Enemy Act. [3]

Wartime

The quasigovernmental Commission on Training Camp Activities enforced discipline around military training facilities, including the overnight extrajudicial detention of women arrested for suspicion of prostitution. [4]

Working with President Woodrow Wilson, the U.S. Attorney General, Thomas Gregory, carried out activities under the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. 2,300 aliens were detained and over 2,000 war critics prosecuted.

Security made use of unofficial but government-funded groups, such as, according to the Attorney General, the "American Protective League has proven to be invaluable and constitutes a most important auxiliary and reserve force for the Bureau of Investigation. Its membership, which is carefully guarded, included leading men in various localities who have volunteered their services for the purpose of being on the lookout for and reporting to this department information of value to the Government, and for the further purpose of endeavoring to secure information regarding any matters about which it may be requested to make inquiry." [5]

Period of "Red Scares"

Starting late in the First World War, especially after the Russian Revolution of 1917, attention changed from the Germans and other major military opponents, to preventive action against perceived threats by non-national radicals, or potential subversives affiliated with the new Soviet Union.

During the war, J. Edgar Hoover, working at the Library of Congress, had led the compilation of information on enemy aliens, both major power and potential subversives. He amassed an estimated 150,000 records of individuals and publications. [5]

While the Espionage Act had expired at the end of the war, state statutes and the deportation provisions of the Immigration Act continued to provide a legal, if extrajudicial, framework.[6] A new Attorney General, A. Mitchell Palmer, had come from the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, but, when appointed in 1919, became extremely concerned with radical and alien politics, regarding the preservation of civil rights as much less of a concern. Palmer saw a widespread Communist conspiracy, not only from the Russian Revolution alone. Some of this might be explained the discovery of thirty-eight bombs sent to leading politicians and the Italian anarchist who blew himself up outside Palmer's Washington home. [7] In May and June, there had been actual domestic bombings.

Palmer reorganized the security functions of the Justice Department, placing two new offices under Assistant Attorney General Francis P. Garvan:[6]

Flynn depended on the deportation law of October 16, 1918, so put priority on "should be particularly directed to persons not citizens of the United States." Nevertheless, he also directed Bureau agents to "make full investigations of similar activities of citizens of the United States with a view to securing evidence which may be of use in prosecutions under the present existing state or federal laws or under legislation of that nature which may hereinafter be enacted." The instructions discussed the provisions of the recent amendments to the Immigration Act, which expanded the grounds for deportation to include membership in revolutionary organizations as well as individual advocacy of violent overthrow of the government.[6]

Palmer ordered raids on November 17, 1919, which was the second anniversary of the Russian Revolution. More than 10,000 suspected communists and anarchists were detained. Emma Goldman and 247 other people, were deported to Russia, while others were imprisoned for substantial periods. He wrote "How the Department of Justice discovered upwards of 60,000 of these organized agitators of the Trotzky [sic] doctrine in the United States is the confidential information upon which the Government is now sweeping the nation clean of such alien filth..."[8] Hoover continued to build the index to 450,000 items, and then began to compile dossiers on identified radicals, by February 1920 numbered 70,000 with short biographies and their publications. [5]

Although they were smaller than the November action, what became known as the "Palmer Raids" took place in January 1920. 6,000 people were arrested without trial, largely members of the International Workers of the World.

When Palmer announced that the communist revolution was likely to take place on 1st May, mass panic took place. In New York, five elected Socialists were expelled from the legislature.

In June 1920, Garvan warned that a new wave of bombings would start on July 4th. In the rest of the year, the General Intelligence Division would receive a large amount of Congress authorized an additional half million dollars for the "Radical Division" above and beyond its initial appropriation of 1.5 million dollars. In December of that same year Congress authorized yet another million dollars for "running down reds" and prosecuting them. 3

Second World War

International law historically has given protection to lawful combatants in direct conflict, allowing them prisoner of war status. Far fewer protections have been granted to enemy agents, both in combatant and in intelligence-gathering roles, who operated in civilian or other disguise. Many of these precedents were argued in detention cases of the George W. Bush Administration.

Date Citizenship Place of capture Captured by Detainment and place Person(s) and cases Comments
1942 U.S. citizens and aliens of Japanese ancestry U.S. U.S. civil and military U.S. in U.S. Executive Order 9066; 56 Stat. 173, March 21, 1942; Korematsu v. United States (1944) SCOTUS upheld detention in Korematsu case
1942 German (military), in civilian clothes and with sabotage materials U.S. U.S. military U.S. military in U.S. ex parte Quirin‎ SCOTUS approved military jurisdiction
1950 German (military) China U.S. military U.S. military in China and Germany Johnson v. Eisentrager‎ SCOTUS denied habeas

Later cases

Medical

There are a number of laws that provide for the indefinite detention, or other restrictions outside prison, on persons judged to be sexual predators. Kansas v. Crane, the Supreme Court of the United States made it necessary that the prosecution prove uncontrollable impulses.

Security-related

George Tenet, Director of Central Intelligence, testified that over 80 terrorists were rendered before 9/11. He described this as a part of broader counterterrorist activity, which included active penetration of groups as well as assisting third country actions. [9]

Date Citizenship Place of capture Captured by Detainment and place Person(s) and cases Comments
1995 Danish resident Croatia CIA Egypt Tal`at Fu'ad Qassim Clinton Administration Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) 39

References

  1. An Act Respecting Alien Enemies, Avalon Project, Yale University, July 6, 1789
  2. Harriet Moore (2008), Contagion from Abroad: U.S. Press Framing of Immigrants and Epidemics, 1891 to 1893, Georgia State University
  3. Daniel J. Tichenor, The Forgotten Virtues of Executive Restraint: Liberal Democracy, Prerogative Power, and Unfettered Presidentialism, Department of Political Science, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, p. 10
  4. Anne Cipriano Venzon (1995), The United States in the First World War: An Encyclopedia, Taylor & Francis, ISBN 0824070550, p. 164
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Sylvia E. Bartley (30 May - 1 June 1996), Intellect Surveilled: Thorstein Veblen and the Organs of State Security, Second Conference of the International Thorstein Veblen Association
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Francis J. Rafalko, ed., Chapter 3, Post Civil War to World War I, A Counterintelligence Reader: American Revolution to World War II, National Counterintelligence Executive, Office of the Director of National Intelligence
  7. Alexander Mitchell Palmer, Spartacus Schoolnet
  8. Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer Makes “The Case against the Reds”, History Matters, George Mason University
  9. Eighth Public Hearing, National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States