MediaMatters: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
  | url = http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200405281333.asp}}</ref>  
  | url = http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200405281333.asp}}</ref>  
==Funding==
==Funding==
The organization's website does not prominently list funding. A critic, [[Byron York]] of ''[[National Review]]'', lists:<ref name=NR2004-05-28 >
The organization's website does not prominently list funding. A critic, [[Byron York]] of ''[[National Review]]'', lists:<ref name=NR2004-05-28 />
*[[Susie Tompkins Buell]]  
*[[Susie Tompkins Buell]]  
*[[Leo Hindery]]
*[[Leo Hindery]]
Line 27: Line 27:
  | author = Mark Jurkowitz | journal = Providence Phoenix}}</ref> Some right-wing media-monitoring groups are more aggressive, such as Discover the Networks from the [[David Horowitz Freedom Center]] and JihadWatch from [[Robert Spencer]].
  | author = Mark Jurkowitz | journal = Providence Phoenix}}</ref> Some right-wing media-monitoring groups are more aggressive, such as Discover the Networks from the [[David Horowitz Freedom Center]] and JihadWatch from [[Robert Spencer]].


"I looked around, and aside from FAIR and blogs, it was a pretty empty space," says Brock. FAIR senior analyst [[[Steve Rendall]] says he welcomed the new entry, noting that FAIR concentrates largely on reporting issues in the mainstream media while Media Matters focuses "on right-wing commentators most of the time." Brock said that he is in a niche, and not trying to do  extensive content analyses and monitor standards and practices. "We have a more narrow mission," he says. "To work against undue conservative influence in the media."<ref name=Phoenix />
"I looked around, and aside from FAIR and blogs, it was a pretty empty space," says Brock. FAIR senior analyst [[Steve Rendall]] says he welcomed the new entry, noting that FAIR concentrates largely on reporting issues in the mainstream media while Media Matters focuses "on right-wing commentators most of the time." Brock said that he is in a niche, and not trying to do  extensive content analyses and monitor standards and practices. "We have a more narrow mission," he says. "To work against undue conservative influence in the media."<ref name=Phoenix />


The ''Phoenix'' stated the challenge, "Given his own history, Brock knows plenty about conservative pressure. But he’s also aware that questions continue to dog him in his new incarnation. Who is the real David Brock, and why should we trust him?"     
The ''Phoenix'' stated the challenge, "Given his own history, Brock knows plenty about conservative pressure. But he’s also aware that questions continue to dog him in his new incarnation. Who is the real David Brock, and why should we trust him?"     

Revision as of 10:26, 2 December 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
See also: David Brock

Media Matters for America' is a progressive-identified not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) interest group and think tank, formed in 2004, with a goal of "monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media." Its publication is Web-based.

David Brock, a former conservative, is chief executive officer.

It received substantial start-up funding from Democratic advocates, and, along with the questions on Brock, has had its neutrality challenged. Other media monitoring services, less subject to ideological challenge, say it fills a niche and is reasonably accurate. Leo Hindery, a Democratic contributor, said "There are people like Mike Lux [a Democratic consultant who runs an important ad agency],who are into the strategy point of view, there's Podesta [ and the Center for American Progress ], who's into the think tank/intellectual side, and I think the third part of the triangle is David's initiative." [1]

Funding

The organization's website does not prominently list funding. A critic, Byron York of National Review, lists:[1]

Role and neutrality

The Providence Phoenix pointed out that political media monitoring has been more the province of the Right, as with groups such as Accuracy in Media (AIM) and Media Research Center (MRC). Organized liberal media criticism had been largely the domain of only one group: the 20-year-old Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR). This article raised some concerns from the relatively small number of non-ideological media monitoring groups, such as Bryan Keefer, of CJRDaily.org, an online media-monitoring site created by the Columbia Journalism Review: "In terms of accuracy, they’re generally pretty good as far as they go,...But they are "self-consciously lefty.... They’re really only looking for things where liberals have been treated unfairly or where conservatives have gotten away with things." [2] Some right-wing media-monitoring groups are more aggressive, such as Discover the Networks from the David Horowitz Freedom Center and JihadWatch from Robert Spencer.

"I looked around, and aside from FAIR and blogs, it was a pretty empty space," says Brock. FAIR senior analyst Steve Rendall says he welcomed the new entry, noting that FAIR concentrates largely on reporting issues in the mainstream media while Media Matters focuses "on right-wing commentators most of the time." Brock said that he is in a niche, and not trying to do extensive content analyses and monitor standards and practices. "We have a more narrow mission," he says. "To work against undue conservative influence in the media."[2]

The Phoenix stated the challenge, "Given his own history, Brock knows plenty about conservative pressure. But he’s also aware that questions continue to dog him in his new incarnation. Who is the real David Brock, and why should we trust him?"

More vexing for Brock is the cloud of suspicion that continues to hang over his work, in light of his ideological journey and confessed unethical behavior. "Once somebody has demonstrated himself to be an utterly untrustworthy liar," asks Tom Rosenstiel of the Washington, DC–based Project for Excellence in Journalism "why in the world would anybody think he has credibility now that he has switched teams?" Brock responded, " "If people don’t know me it can be difficult and it’s a totally legitimate and understandable question. In the history of ideological conversions, I’m not really aware of any that have changed twice."

Recent activity

In October 2009, Brock said, of Fox News,"Our analysis of their programming has led us to the unavoidable conclusion that Fox is no longer operating as a “conservative news organization,” but as an outright partisan political operation – and brazenly so." [3]

References