Metaphor/Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(add biblio item)
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(add biblio item)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
* Gibbs RW Jr. (ed.) (2008) ''The Cambridge Handbook Metaphor and Thought''. Twenty-Eight Chapters. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-511-43376-4. | [http://www.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521841061 Information about this book.] | [http://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/41061/excerpt/9780521841061_excerpt.pdf Introduction, downloadable PDF file.]
* Carlos Cornejo. (2007) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067X07082806  Review Essay: Conceptualizing Metaphors versus Embodying the Language: Kövecses, Zoltán, Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation.] ''Culture Psychology'' 13:474-488.
* Carlos Cornejo. (2007) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067X07082806  Review Essay: Conceptualizing Metaphors versus Embodying the Language: Kövecses, Zoltán, Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation.] ''Culture Psychology'' 13:474-488.



Revision as of 23:16, 17 December 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Addendum [?]
 
A list of key readings about Metaphor.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
  • Brigitte Nerlich and David D. Clarke. (2001) Mind, meaning and metaphor: the philosophy and psychology of metaphor in 19th-century Germany. History of the Human Sciences 14:39-61.
    • From Abstract: This article explores a German philosophy of metaphor, which proposed a close link between the body and the mind as the basis for metaphor, debunked the view that metaphor is just a decorative rhetorical device and questioned the distinction between the literal and the figurative….thinkers contributed to a philosophy and psychology of the metaphoric according to which metaphors are not only nice, but necessary for the structure and growth of human thought and language. Obvious parallels between this 19th-century philosophy of metaphor and the 20th-century theory of metaphor developed by Lakoff and his followers.