Political opinion broadcasting: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{TOC|right}} There has been a trend, especially in the United States but in its world media, for political news coverage to have become more a matter of opinion and sensationalizing. Acce...) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
{{TOC|right}} | {{TOC|right}} | ||
There has been a trend, especially in the United States but in its world media, for political news coverage to have become more a matter of opinion and sensationalizing. Accelerated by investigative reporting in the [[Vietnam War]] and [[Watergate]], and by the advent of 24-hour news programs in tight ratings competition, it is a far cry from the gentlemens' agreements not to report the peccadilloes and health of politicians as recently as the 1960s. For a politician to fall afoul of such a pack of scavengers today should not be interpreted, as other than "nothing personal, only business." As Harry Truman once put it, "if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen." | There has been a trend, especially in the United States but in its world media, for political news coverage to have become more a matter of opinion and sensationalizing. Accelerated by investigative reporting in the [[Vietnam War]] and [[Watergate]], and by the advent of 24-hour news programs in tight ratings competition, it is a far cry from the gentlemens' agreements not to report the peccadilloes and health of politicians as recently as the 1960s. For a politician to fall afoul of such a pack of scavengers today should not be interpreted, as other than "nothing personal, only business." As Harry Truman once put it, "if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen." | ||
Revision as of 19:00, 19 July 2009
There has been a trend, especially in the United States but in its world media, for political news coverage to have become more a matter of opinion and sensationalizing. Accelerated by investigative reporting in the Vietnam War and Watergate, and by the advent of 24-hour news programs in tight ratings competition, it is a far cry from the gentlemens' agreements not to report the peccadilloes and health of politicians as recently as the 1960s. For a politician to fall afoul of such a pack of scavengers today should not be interpreted, as other than "nothing personal, only business." As Harry Truman once put it, "if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen."
Classic non-reportage
Franklin D. Roosevelt, while a paraplegic, was never shown, by the media of the time, as having a movement disability. The physical health of John F. Kennedy was not mentioned in the 1960 presidential campaign.
Vietnam
It has been characteristic, in political media coverage of the last few decades, for a media mob to descend on any irregularity, such as George Romney during the Vietnam War, when he tearfuly said he had been "brainwashed".[1]
Another aspect of Vietnam, however, was a growing distrust in official sources, often considered to begin with the rosy coverage of the Battle of Ap Bac, with irregularities uncovered by Neil Sheehan and David Halberstam,
Watergate
24/7 News
This trend vastly accelerated with the advent of 24/7 cable news and its search for ratings, the transfer of major network news departments from a public service to a profit center economic model, and the advent of blogging and other high-speed, not validated sources of information.
Emotion-laden commentary
A variant of the latter was the advent of radio and television commentators and talk shows that seem outlets for indignation rather than venues for rational discussion. One of the first appearances was the "Point Counterpoint" segment of 60 Minutes, with Shana Alexander and James Kilpatrick, beginning in 1975.[2] In 1984, the McLaughlin Group began a free-standing on-air argument. [3]
References
- ↑ Republicans: The Brainwashed Candidate, 15 September 1967
- ↑ Dennis McLellan, "Shana Alexander, famed for "Point/Counterpoint," dies", Los Angeles Times
- ↑ Richard Sandomir, "AT LUNCH WITH: The McLaughlin Group; Just Another Talk Show? Wronnnggg!", New York Times